@professorrespect:
Crie
Not an argument.
And? Are you saying the Necrosword can't make shockwaves or something?
When there is no indication
It mentions his body tearing apart, sure. It doesn't mention only his hits causing the destruction, sadly.
There is in fact... plenty of evidence for the people that don´t want to push an agenda see. The whole focus of the first two paragraphs and the whole moment is in the swing of the hammer each time harder then previosly. There is a swift reference to the cuts but the whole part is about Thor and his bludgeoning and thundering. The specific pannel in fact takes the time to focus on only things that relate to Thor:
"Thor ignored the pain (whose pain? Thor´s). The roar of his own screams. The shattering of worlds around him Thor focused only on bludgeoning and ignored...."
And even if we ignore that and give ourselves to the reading comprehension curse i can substantiate that the power comes from Thor because Thor´s power can shatter planets. Gorr has no feats of doing this.
You are against assuming things up until the moment it does not suit you.
We see the bludgeoning, we see the consequences of bludgeoning, we see that thor thundered on (which means strike powerfully plus a pun bc he is you know the god of thunder) you don´t see any mention of Gorr cuts affecting nothing except Thor.
So logically you atribute this to Gorr too (??????????)
>asks if thor can bust a planet
>"u evading the quantifying questions?"
ok
I'm just going to respond to what's relevant given you waste time talking about nonsensical and irrelevant elements that aren't related to the questions. Don't do that.
Ok. What can Thor bust then prof.
Not a planet-sized mass?
This is called evasion prof. Or being "vague"
A small planet, alas; something easy to tell just from the art and proportions alone. Still don't see Thor busting one yet.
And this is subjective as hell. You know what is not subjective? what the writer wrote on his own story defining what is a planet that coincides with the scientific definition of a planet. Plus again you are literaly denying evidence prof
Why are we talking about small moons now?
Prof for the love of god read the scans. This "small moons" are the bigger moons on the solar system. Most of them are bigger than Mercury and just a bit smaller than mars...a small planet
>Small moons
>mars sized object
lol
Show it happening. I don't care about your vague scaling involving things that aren't
A. Thor
B. Thor interacting with a planet-sized mass.
Anything else that goes as broad and as off-topic as what you have presented has no interest from me.
Bill interacting with a planet sized mass. Thor interacting with a planet sized mass and acidentally destroying when he is not touching it. Jane Thor cracking a planet sized mass.
Show it then. If it's not vague then it should be a simple and easy matter to just show the feat happening.
I mean besides the one that you claimed it was not a planet going against the writer? And the one you deny because it is "scalling" when something that just survived a planet busting is torn to shreads and then survives planet busting AGAIN only to lose conscious against a few hits from bill again?
I mean besides the one that had to be fixed by Thor midfight because the shockwaves (which get weaker by simple phisics involving volume) were shattering aka my first scan?
Cool, same issue where Ulik debuted and the same one where him destroying a mountain was as impressive as destroying a planet.
Obviously neither happened, so it's essentially a non-important hyperbolic with no relevance to the scaling here.
Out of the two statements the one he can affect a planet wins by 100% advantage (2 to one). And they don´t contradict each other too "oh so he can destroy a mountain? it is even worse he can level and shatter a planet too.
Is it not important? when there are more than 14 statements indicating the EXACT same thing? when it is show that Thor can shatter planets on pannel? when it is show that Bill can shatter planets?
"It is plain to seethat Thorhas phisicalsin themoonlevelat least245678 (focusing the power that could destroy the moon by being near it)9 (for an extended period of time with a lighting that at least lowballing dwarfed the moon)
Ok, so moon-level busting? Cool. Where's the planet busting?
In the scans prof, you need to open them to read it. Like the one that Thor controled a storm that could make lighting that is bigger than the sun, winds that can blow away the sun/planets out of orbit and canalised a good part of it to his body
Of course the argument here being pretty simple: Moon level stats and planet level stricking with Mjolnir just like it was stated
Why are we comparing moons to planets? You are saying "bigger moons" that can be compared size-wise but you don't have any detailed showings to suggest which ones are which nor how cracking them is supposed to conflate to such.
Because if earth was closer to Jupiter we would be one of Jupiter´s moon. If you really want to be less vague you will have to understand that there is an overlap between "big moons" and small planets.
So basically what i showed you was Jane Thor cracking a bunch of mars and mercuries while not even trying to destroy it and without Mjolnir. On pannel.
To summarize:
Thor has no planet-busting feats
He has vague ways of trying to stick him to that level if you do scaling chains
He has statements that allude to such but have no logical follow-through
fairly easy to get.
Yeah if you want to be nitpicky and wrong lol.
Thor was shattering a planet not even being close to it. We know it was a planet because the writer of the story stated so and we saw being shattered too.
It is not inconssistent because the feat was replicated in smaller scale in less dangerous situations, has plenthora of statement and a bunch of evidence of being able to do so, like shattering planet sized celestial bodies with mere punches, his equal destroying a planet etc.
Your argument is like if i said: an atomic bomb of today can destroy a city. And then you go "nuh hun we never saw it being used"
The initial question of does Thor have planetary striking? Has the only answer: Yes, he shattered worlds by not even touching them.
is this consistent: Yes. We were led o believe that he can do this, over and over
Log in to comment