@shootingnova said:
It was his own ship, not Obi-Wan's starfighter. I missed several things.
Though as Intrepid pointed out, a lot of those feats are from the Tartakovsky Clone Wars series, which was heavily stylised and is inconsistent with Grievous' current capabilities. He's been nerfed significantly in the new series.
Evidence? I have never seen strength feats from Bane superseding Grievous's.
If people like Obi-Wan, Ventress and Ahsoka can increase their strength to deal with Grievous', I HIGHLY doubt that Bane wouldn't be able to do the same, given that he's much more powerful than any of them and well as physically stronger in the first place. In fact, in Season 5 Episode 9: A Necessary Bond, Ahsoka engages Grievous in a saber lock and pushes him back. Weep for the depths of Grievous' pussifcation.
And Bane's strength has never overwhelmed anybody in a duel either.
Incorrect. In RoT the sheer strength behind Banes initial attack tears Farfalla's lightsaber from his grasp in one blow. Zannah also mentions how overwhelming his strength is in both their duels.
His speed is sort of nerfed in TCW. The first time he stomped Ahsoka who ran away with help, and the second time she ran away as well, but lasted longer. However, she did last a bit against Ventress so I don't suppose she was the worst duelist ever - and TCW seems to want to make Ahsoka appear stronger than most padawans. Frankly though - Grievous still has his other speed feats which outmatch Bane's. And he overloaded Kenobi's defenses, which frankly surpass either Bane's or Zannah's (considering how he has deflected blaster fire from entire armies).
Ahsoka is stronger than most padawans, but she is still only a 16 year old padawan. That neither Grievous or Ventress could overwhelm her with speed indicates that they aren't nearly as fast as you are saying they are. And no, Grievous' speed isn't above Banes, as Zampano indicated above. He did not overload Kenobi's defense and Kenobi hasn't deflected blaster fire from entire armies. Both of those come from the same section of the RotS novel iirc. And both of them are wildly inconsistent with the movie, which is the ultimate canonical source.
Yes, they are. Bane has no feats exceeding that of around Anakin's level. There are numerous beings faster than Bane. Off the top of my head - Luke, Caedus, Palpatine, Plagueis, Yoda, Tenebrous, Windu, Vader, Dooku and Grievous.
I'm not quite sure how you can say that with a straight face after reading the lengthy post from Zampano above. Bane appearing to wield a dozen lightsabers at once from Zannah's perspective is above all of the guys after Windu (and Windu) on your list. And I'd probably put him above Tenebrous as well. You haven't really convinced me that Tenebrous can roll with the big dogs yet I'm afraid.
Somebody as durable as Vader/Grievous has the potential to resist being slain by a single stroke. It has happened before, as you may or may not know.
I'll give you Vader, though that's because of his armor. And if we're including armor then Bane's the most durable guy around in all likelihood, as nothing can match the orbalisks for raw protection. Grievous though has never resisted a lightsaber strike to my knowledge and Obi-Wan sliced through his hands easily enough .
I realize that - but frankly speaking - that wasn't duelingskill. So honestly, it isn't much of a low feat anyways. I'm not saying Bane couldn't do it - but in dueling skill, where Koon has contended with Ventress with a broken arm and where Fisto has beaten Grievous - speaks for itself. Bane is not the duelist they are.
It kind of is. It might not be a result of dueling skill, but it was a result of combat ability. Savage showed that he was able to reach over and rip off Koon's mask and Koon couldn't stop him from doing that. Savage showed that he was fast enough or dominating enough to do that, and that Koon was beneath him enough not to be able to prevent it.
I don't see beating Grievous as the impressive feat you do. And at any rate, Fisto didn't actually defeat Grievous, the fight was interrupted. Koon fending off Ventress was impressive, but this was merely at the start of her career. She likely wasn't nearly as skilled as she'd later become. As I recall, Fisto "beating" Grievous was right at the start of the Clone Wars too.
Bane meanwhile was beating Kas'im and in RoT he was able to force back Raskta, Farfalla and Johun at the same time in a duel once thier Battle Meditation wore off. Kas'im and Raskta were both two of the most skilled swordsmen in the mythos and even Farfalla's lightsaber form was described as 'perfect'. Bane mastered the lightsaber to the point where Kas'im declared him 'beyond forms' and that he had nothing else to teach him. He mastered hundreds of thousands of lightsaber sequences in a extremely short amount of time and had plenty afterwards to improve on. You underestimate his skills.
Does this matter? Unless you are omniscient, you not hearing something doesn't make it invalid. I believe it was referenced to in The Cestus Deception.
My friend says it doesn't say that in Cestus Deception. And it does matter, as unless I know it to be true I'm going to ask you to actually prove your points.
Not all forms. The biggest example is Djem So. The heavy usage of physical strength in Djem So is extremely effective against the physically lax Makashi. Makashi's kinetic output is limited and therefore anybody with substantial strength is good against a Makashi practitioner to some degree.
As for why Makahi beats Shii-Cho - Shii-Cho never addressed lightsaber-to-lightsaber combat. Its larger sweeps were most effective against multiple opponents, and it was also suited to deflecting blaster fire. Neither of these is effective in a one-on-one duel, nor are they useful in any way. While Shii-Cho does not address lightsaber-to-lightsaber combat, that is the specialty of the Makashi form, which emphasizes economical, elegant dueling against a single opponent. Furthermore, another of Shii-Cho's strengths was the ability to disarm opponents, while a Makashi duelist trained rigorously against this, and a true Makashi master could almost never be disarmed by virtue of dueling. Makashi was practically built as a counter to Shii-Cho by ancient Sith against Jedi.
Yeah, I've heard people say that before and I don't really see any evidence for it. You could just as easily claim that the clumsy power-strikes of Djem So leave one open to a precise Makashi riposte.
Well, its not quite true that it never addressed lightsaber combat. Shii-Cho was adapted out of traditional swordfighting afterall. This point is irrelevant enough that I won't waste my time on it, but as I say, I've never actually seen any evidence supporting this argument.
With his Lightning, he could beat her. By virtue of dueling? No. Does he have "much better" feats in telekinesis? No.
Its funny how you think a mere Dark Jedi can match a Dark Lord of the Sith in combat. He'd take her apart in a lightsaber duel through virtue of his superior power and speed. Recall that even though Kas'im was more skilled than Bane, Bane was still winning through just being more powerful. I foresee a similar victory here, though unlike with Kas'im, Ventress isn't actually more skilled than Bane. And yes he is much better with telekinesis. Bane's mere Force Pushes can pulp bones and internal organs and he's disintegrated opponents with a wave of his hand.
By this logic, Bane's Rule of Two failed. Each successive apprentice would be more powerful than their master, so in their primes, each Sith Lord in the Banite Sith line was more powerful than their predecessor. By loose description, each master's power passed on to their apprentice upon their deaths, which was how Palpatine described it.
Anyways, I fail to see how this is the case. Tenebrous is significantly faster, significantly more agile, significantly more powerful telekinetically, and significantly more powerful protectively. Beyond that - he possesses the ability to cast Force Lightning, something Zannah doesn't have and something that has given her difficulty in the past, and can mix multiple lightsaber forms in combat, something that perhaps Zannah has never seen before. I'm sure even @intrepid37 here would agree with me that Zannah alone does not beat Tenebrous.
Is it not your own logic as well? Since you're clearly arguing from the position that Bane is the superior combatant to Zannah and the bigger threat. The Rule of Two is not some infallible law, theres no proof that the Banite Sith conveniently located beings streadily more powerful as apprentices. In fact, such a concept is quite laughable. And it certainly does not seem to be the case. Cognus did not appear to be especially powerful, she simply possessed the ability to blunt the abilities of others, making her a worthy apprentice.
I'm not seeing how Tenebrous is faster than Zannah. He's not wowing me in that area and she was capable of defending adequately against Banes speed without being overwhelmed. Furthermore, her fighting style is such that speed and agility are quite useless against her unless you possess a great advantage over her in those areas. Tenebrous isn't going to be threatening her in lightsaber combat imo. He's not getting through her defenses. Telekinetically I am again not seeing that. While Zannah hasn't demonstrated much, Bane outright admits that he can't beat her in a Force fight. And even as an untrained child Zannah disintegrated a persons arm, instantly killed 2 Jedi by getting pissed, levitated and blocked a firestorm a hell of a lot bigger than the explosion Tenebrous blocked. All of it unconsciously. With an infinitely improved command of her power I think its safe to say she's quite a bit more significant then you're giving her credit for. Zannah had a modicum of difficulty from Bane's lightning, true... which is enough for me to comfortably conclude that she'd have no trouble with Tenebrous' at all. He doesn't hold a candle to Bane in that area.
PoD Bane? LOL. Tenebrous is much faster and much more agile. His feats with telekinesis (which caused him no strain at all) outstrip Bane's significantly. His ability to erect Force Barriers supersedes Bane by miles. At this point, his Lightning supersedes Bane's too. If Zannah lets Bane come in by himself, she is condemning him to his death, and effectively dooming herself.
As for Zannah's bombarding him with Sorcery - that doesn't seem likely, considering how in all of her duels she began first with a lightsaber and then retreated to use Sorcery. That should be the same here.
The incident with Cynthia is irrelevant because she was fodder. The incident with Set Harth - well, she dueled him first and used sorcery at the end when she had basically beaten him already. The duel against Bane on Ambria took her quite some time to charge up her sorcery for the mental assault - while the tendrils is inapplicable here on Geonosis because she does not have Ambria to amp her.
Ehhh, naw. Tenebrous is not much faster than Bane. Nor more agile. Bane can do a standing backflip. I know that's not much but compared to a guy who has shown absolutely nothing with regards to agility its still better. As of PoD, Bane is likely slower than Tenebrous', but not to the extent that he cannot compete with him and tie him up long enough for Zannah to Force-pwn him. I disagree with your assessment of their TK and lol at the Force Barriers. Even Kas'im showed a better Force Barrier than Tenebrous when he blocked Bane's charged up Force Wave that was stated to be capable of liquidating his flesh. Tenebrous blocked an explosion. Not that impressive. And no, Banes lightning is still superior given that he turned a person to ash with a one-handed blast at the start of RoT (which takes place a few days after PoD).
Zannah mostly begins with lightsabers because mostly her opponents run over and engage her in lightsaber combat. Sorcery takes time and effort to perform, so she can't do it while an opponent is swinging at her. And she engaged Bane in lightsaber combat under the prison because he was unarmed and she believed that was enough of an edge. Afterwards she chides herself for making this mistake and realises that Sorcery is her primary and best weapon and she should have opened up with that. In this case she has the time and opportunity to perform it and has no reason not to. She's a defensive fighter in the first place, so she's not going to move in to attack Tenebrous. As I said, while Bane keeps Tenebrous busy, she'll have free reign to dish out sorcerous assualts, and if he tries to attack her, her defenses are more than capable of fending him off long enough to disengage when Bane draws his attention again. Bane and Zannah win every round.
Log in to comment