@richubs:
I've seen a lot of people claim that DCEU Faora and Nam-Ek are not as fast or as strong as DCEU Superman and I just wanted to know where all of that came from.
Because they fought a noob superman and still were losing once they were 1 vs 1. Simple answer is that Superman was fully adapted, they were not.
If we analyze the Smallville fight I think it's pretty clear they're pretty close. They just lack flight, heat vision and atmosphere adaptation but in terms of speed and strength I'd say they're pretty close.
Well Superman was actually severly weakened moments before that on the kryptonian ship, yet he was holding his own against both of them at same time while trying to save people etc. First he was struggling, then he got upperhand and stomped both of them 1 vs 1.
And that's when they're unadopted. I've heard people say that they'd be weaker even AFTER they adapt.
Scaling wise no they wouldnt. Adapted Zod was nearly equal/slightly weaker than Superman. By feats yeah superman is better, but scaling to superman they would be nearly equal maybe slightly weaker than him. Why we can scale them is because they are the same species. Its like comparing human to human in terms of durability.
Now why do I say they're in the same league?
It's because Faora was absolutely dominating Clark in their entire 1v1. Faora beat the shit out of Clark and didn't let him land more than one hit.
It was not really a domination, she had upperhad for a slight moment, then superman was going toe to toe with both and beaten both later on.
She casually reacted to his bullrushes and outsped him in h2h in the diner.
I would not say that superman was going all out with his speed against her like the same way he did vs JL. But yeah she is very fast herself.
How can anyone claim she's slower than him after this confrontation?
Because she has shown those feats vs a rookie clark. Later on, Clark seemed to be much more experienced with his pwers.
Now when Nam-Ek joined Faora is was absolutely horrible for Clark.
Not really, he was still holding his own for a while and i wouldnt say Clark was really bloodlusted against them as they were towards him.
They both were annihilating him. Clark fought smartly when he was on the ground and didn't go for any offensive attacks but mostly defended himself.
Well 2 vs 1 afterall with morals on clark.
In between that fight Superman tries to fly off with one of them and the other one catches him not even 20 meters off of the ground even though they had no flight. They just jumped fast enough to catch up to him.
We have seen that kryptonians can jump very fast and Clark didnt outright use his top speed there in flight.
When Nam-Ek and Clark were fighting I'd say Clark had the edge because Nam-Ek seemed more like a brawler unlike Faora so Clark could take some advantage but overall they all were clearly in the same speed bracket.
He didnt have the edge, he stomped Nam Ek and no they were not in the same speed bracket. Clark outsped him multiple times.
When he went for 1v1 he was losing and when it was a 2v1 it was a demolition.
Holding back Clark? yes. Though he still beat them even without trying really in 1 vs 1.
I would like to know why people think they're in different speed brackets beause they clearly are not. And I've seen this multiple times in the battle forums mainly in DCEU vs MCU battles.
I think adapted kryptonians would be able to react to his top speed. But i dont think they would match him if he used speed like vs flash if they were unadapted.
It'd be pretty interesting to see Faora fully adapted demolishing Clark because honestly she'd shit on him hard if she got fully adapted.
Well its pretty established that zod is the best military out there and adapted zod got destroyed by holding back Superman. So no most likely Clark would still dominate.
Overall i agree that they are far underrated, but they are slightly below clark in everything.
Log in to comment