Not a feminist, but let's be real for a second

  • 134 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for timandm
Timandm

3393

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#51  Edited By Timandm

@mrdecepticonleader:

You still don't don't get it... You think of "feminist" as a label. You also think of it as some sort of 'restraining collar.' As if one who is a feminist can't possibly be ANYTHING else...

You believe that a person who is a feminist can't also be say.. an animal rights activist. or a child welfare activist..

And you ARE contradicting yourself big time... If you don't believe that women should have equal rights, then you CANNOT believe that all human beings should have equal rights. Half of those human beings you say should have rights ARE women... You cannot advocate for the rights of all people if you are going to exclude women.... Just as you cannot advocate for equal rights of people of all races, if you exclude any one of the races.....

Thus, by stating that you would never advocate for the rights of women, you are stating that you don't really believe in advocating for the rights of "all" people.....

Avatar image for mrdecepticonleader
mrdecepticonleader

19714

Forum Posts

2501

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@Timandm said:

@mrdecepticonleader:

You still don't don't get it... You think of "feminist" as a label. You also think of it as some sort of 'restraining collar.' As if one who is a feminist can't possibly be ANYTHING else...

You believe that a person who is a feminist can't also be say.. an animal rights activist. or a child welfare activist..

And you ARE contradicting yourself big time... If you don't believe that women should have equal rights, then you CANNOT believe that all human beings should have equal rights. Half of those human beings you say should have rights ARE women... You cannot advocate for the rights of all people if you are going to exclude women.... Just as you cannot advocate for equal rights of people of all races, if you exclude any one of the races.....

Thus, by stating that you would never advocate for the rights of women, you are stating that you don't really believe in advocating for the rights of "all" people.....

Whoa relax. I really didnt want to get into this but,if you insist.

I am not a feminist,since I think the term is inadequate.As I have said I am for equality for all,men,women,gay people,straight people etc..

Just because I am for all right does not make me a feminist,since there are things I don't agree with regarding feminism. I am not a masculanist just like I am not a feminist.

Avatar image for timandm
Timandm

3393

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By Timandm

@mrdecepticonleader: Interesting..

I suppose, when filling out a medical history form, you refuse to check the box that says either 'male' or 'female' since either term would be " limiting. "

To be labeled as either Male or Female would be too limiting since, really, you are a human being and no one is going to trap you with a label...

You could also say that you are not a "Homo Sapiens" since that " label " is far too limiting. In truth, you are a multi-cellular, eukaryotic, Hetero/chemotroph who ingests your source of nutrients and organic carbon, that has an endo-skeleton and vertebrae.....

You also NEVER fill out a census form since the census would require you to "label" yourself with some sort of nationality... You REFUSE to be labled as American, or English, or Russian since those " labels " would be too limiting. You're not a citizen of the United States or Great Britain or Japan... NO! You're a member of the " HUMAN RACE " and anyone who " labels" themselves with a nationality can't possibly ALSO be a member of the Human Race.

You're right. I see it now... There's no way I could advocate for the rights of all people if I believe in advocating for equality among the sexes... I'm so glad you set me straight.

Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#54  Edited By akbogert

Guys, please start an off-topic thread about Feminist/Rights Nomenclature (there, use that as a title). I really don't want to see this thread closed, because I think it raises some interesting points -- about artistic portrayal of women. That was the topic, and it'd suck for it to be shut down because of a tangent. (cc and maybe )

Avatar image for timandm
Timandm

3393

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By Timandm

@akbogert: I don't appreciate you labeling me with the impersonal pronoun "Guys".... I refused to be labeled in such a limiting way!!! LOL! Relax, I'm just playing... Okay, I'll put my big boy pants on and behave now...

Avatar image for pathtales
pathtales

44

Forum Posts

732

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

#56  Edited By pathtales

The term "Feminist" continues to be discussed and I wanted to mention that I actually dislike the term in general. As a female, I agree women need equal rights, however I'm of the mind set of simply Equality. I feel like "Feminist" has been turned into a negative thing and distorted by a various range of things.

I am personally a Pansexual, as in I don't see gender at all. There isn't just male and female, there is a wide verity of in betweens that I don't want to go into, but I recognize and accept. Note: That doesn't mean I'm Bi, there is a very large difference. My personal preference is masculinity, so I'm pretty much attracted to men. Again, that being said, I did have a transsexual boyfriend, but the way that I see gender means I don't see the biological but the emotional and mental.

That being said, the difference between genders is rather significant. Each has it's own unique characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses. Men tend to be larger in muscle mass and can achieve larger mass, however they can be a lean fit as well. They tend to be more Boxy with sharper angles, and tend to have less flexibility, but for the most part are slightly stronger. Women usually have softer angels and less muscle mass, but there are those who are very efficient and talented muscle builders. Women are more flexible and tend to have more agility, but the gender roles for every stereotype can easily be broken.

This brings back to the argument of how comics are portrayed. Some people do like the ridiculous or the stereotypes, others like the extreme breakage or submission to them, while others like myself prefer a since of realism that is stretch enough to capture the imagination, but still that relateable piece.

It has been mentioned about the over muscular and perfected male body as well like Superman, and I'd have to admit I rather dislike him. He's a great guy, but I've never been one to like "The ultimate hero" that has 0 weaknesses. I like a tad of humanity and weakness to characters because it makes it more appealing. If you win over and over again, it gets boring.

Avatar image for mrdecepticonleader
mrdecepticonleader

19714

Forum Posts

2501

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@Timandm said:

@mrdecepticonleader: Interesting..

I suppose, when filling out a medical history form, you refuse to check the box that says either 'male' or 'female' since either term would be " limiting. "

To be labeled as either Male or Female would be too limiting since, really, you are a human being and no one is going to trap you with a label...

You could also say that you are not a "Homo Sapiens" since that " label " is far too limiting. In truth, you are a multi-cellular, eukaryotic, Hetero/chemotroph who ingests your source of nutrients and organic carbon, that has an endo-skeleton and vertebrae.....

You also NEVER fill out a census form since the census would require you to "label" yourself with some sort of nationality... You REFUSE to be labled as American, or English, or Russian since those " labels " would be too limiting. You're not a citizen of the United States or Great Britain or Japan... NO! You're a member of the " HUMAN RACE " and anyone who " labels" themselves with a nationality can't possibly ALSO be a member of the Human Race.

You're right. I see it now... There's no way I could advocate for the rights of all people if I believe in advocating for equality among the sexes... I'm so glad you set me straight.

I think you really misunderstand what I was saying,since you seem to have blown things out of proportion and just gone of on your own little tangent.Just because I am not a feminist and you don't like it.

Grow up.

And apologies again to the OP and other users.It was not my intention to derail this thread.

Avatar image for pathtales
pathtales

44

Forum Posts

732

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

#58  Edited By pathtales
Avatar image for decoy_elite
Decoy Elite

30159

Forum Posts

1875

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#59  Edited By Decoy Elite

Not the biggest fan of fan service for fan services sake myself. I understand that it can help sales, and I'll tolerate it as long as it's not too distracting.  
And yes I know the irony of this statement when I'm using this AV. 
There now I posted in the right thread. 

Avatar image for timandm
Timandm

3393

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By Timandm

@mrdecepticonleader: Oh you misunderstand. I'm WITH YOU on this now! I finally get it... That's why I'm going to support the new movement in which the former members of the Atlanta Braves are refusing to be labeled as " Atlanta Braves " because they are professional baseball players and therefore NOT Atlanta Braves... That label was far too limiting... I see it all too clearly now...

Also, I just sent out an email to everyone in my family telling them that I am no longer Hawaiian because I'm a member of the human race... I like this new way of thinking. I'm on your team!!!!

Avatar image for lykopis
lykopis

10845

Forum Posts

40100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By lykopis
Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#62  Edited By akbogert

@lykopis: The first one after the spoiler has got to be one of the best ones I've ever seen, quality-wise and humor-wise.

@Decoy Elite said:

Not the biggest fan of fan service for fan services sake myself. I understand that it can help sales, and I'll tolerate it as long as it's not too distracting. And yes I know the irony of this statement when I'm using this AV. There now I posted in the right thread.

Haha. Yay! I think that first sentence puts something I've been trying to say about Starfire much better than I've been able to put it: I'm fine with how she's drawn because she plays a much larger role in RHatO than just being eye candy.

Avatar image for mrdecepticonleader
mrdecepticonleader

19714

Forum Posts

2501

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@Timandm said:

@mrdecepticonleader: Oh you misunderstand. I'm WITH YOU on this now! I finally get it... That's why I'm going to support the new movement in which the former members of the Atlanta Braves are refusing to be labeled as " Atlanta Braves " because they are professional baseball players and therefore NOT Atlanta Braves... That label was far too limiting... I see it all too clearly now...

Also, I just sent out an email to everyone in my family telling them that I am no longer Hawaiian because I'm a member of the human race... I like this new way of thinking. I'm on your team!!!!

Still nothing remotely intelligent to say.

Fair enough.

I am done responding to you.

Avatar image for mrdecepticonleader
mrdecepticonleader

19714

Forum Posts

2501

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@lykopis said:

I would really encourage everyone to visit The Hawkeye Initiative as pointed out early in this thread - simply hilarious and although it plays with the costumes, it's really the poses that just stun....

Thought I would share a few here since we can always use a few laughs:

Seriously -- it's hilarious. ;P

Heh heh.

Id like to see some done the other way around as well.

Avatar image for timandm
Timandm

3393

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By Timandm

@mrdecepticonleader:

Does this mean I'm off your Christmas list???

Avatar image for lykopis
lykopis

10845

Forum Posts

40100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By lykopis

@mrdecepticonleader said:

@lykopis said:

I would really encourage everyone to visit The Hawkeye Initiative as pointed out early in this thread - simply hilarious and although it plays with the costumes, it's really the poses that just stun....

Thought I would share a few here since we can always use a few laughs:

Seriously -- it's hilarious. ;P

Heh heh.

Id like to see some done the other way around as well.

Know what? What a great idea! It has to be already done somewhere --- I am on it! **dashes off to google**

Avatar image for mrdecepticonleader
mrdecepticonleader

19714

Forum Posts

2501

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@lykopis:Wish you luck in your search

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#68  Edited By Yung ANcient One
I'm more into hips (+)
Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#69  Edited By SC  Moderator

Great blog with great points!

I disagree with a few minor points about breast size and athleticism, but I think I understand your sentiment and agree overall. Plus you are only the third person I have seen on this site who knows who Chloe Bruce.

I like your point about realism, and I think a lot of comic fans fail to realize is that the comics industry is dying because of very backwards ideas and traditional ideas about what sells. Some will say that sex sells, or that males make up the biggest demographic in comics. Sure sex does sell and so there is some validity in thinking so will sexy woman to a male dominated audience and fan-base, however that idea is flawed in an age where most people with access to comics can google image search not just sexy woman, but stylistic sexy woman, porn, and well a lot more. Hell, they can even just try looking for free artwork thats pretty, prettier than the comic art, look hard enough and you can even get good free art of superhero characters!

Artists drawing idealized characters? Readers want to see perfect human bodies? Comic creators better do a good job, with advances in technology I can BE an idealized fictional character and actively decide my own stories. Comics can't rely on selling on such visual ideas and the fact that a lot of the big comic companies important decision makers seem to have outdated ideas and perspectives on the world and are supported by apologists who spend more time trying to justify why comics are the way they have been, instead of trying to keep the best parts of comics and advance to compete with the modern day and future is why majority of comics publishers are getting so desperate.

Cheesecake? Sexuality? Gratuitous sexiness, sex, nudity, etc Not bad things, not the same thing, just depends on what you are trying to do. If a writer and artist present a fully fleshed out female character with a lot of character and visual traits that a reader can idolize, relate to, empathize with, then having them wear something sexy has a different appeal and effect than them trying to wear something sexy all the time. When I say something sexy I mean something so sexy its impractical since some characters pull off sexy in any outfit. Now swap out female character for male character and same thing. A character who wears something impractical because its sexy all the time is going to attract and appeal to readers in a different way. Ditto comics that portray and involve gender and gender differences a certain way.

Conflicting wishes as far as readers go, surprisingly some white males aged 18 to 35 value some things like characterization, character types, plotting, originality, diversity, realism and other things more than sexy woman. So its a balancing act. I mean I love sexy woman, personally, and so I like sexy female characters in my comics, but my personal definition of sexy tends to be different from the majority, and I like my comics to have its fair share of sexy men, and unsexy men, and unsexy women, and body diversity, and character diversity, and costume diversity. Balancing act. What also might work for me, might not work for others. Try and cover bases without losing ground. Comics and comics fans? Many of their ideas and explanations and justifications? Why comics is losing ground.

Heh nothing wrong with being a feminist either. Its a word meant to convey a message, like all words. Like all words it can be hijacked/evolve/devolve with a multitude of reasons good and bad. I personally think you address a word/concept/label/group at its best, otherwise you end up in a world where its easy to take the cheap out and devalue everything and every word. No progress will happen if we cater to the most ignorant, angry, and unreasonable.

Avatar image for minigunman123
minigunman123

3262

Forum Posts

558

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By minigunman123

@SC said:

Great blog with great points!

I disagree with a few minor points about breast size and athleticism, but I think I understand your sentiment and agree overall. Plus you are only the third person I have seen on this site who knows who Chloe Bruce.

I like your point about realism, and I think a lot of comic fans fail to realize is that the comics industry is dying because of very backwards ideas and traditional ideas about what sells. Some will say that sex sells, or that males make up the biggest demographic in comics. Sure sex does sell and so there is some validity in thinking so will sexy woman to a male dominated audience and fan-base, however that idea is flawed in an age where most people with access to comics can google image search not just sexy woman, but stylistic sexy woman, porn, and well a lot more. Hell, they can even just try looking for free artwork thats pretty, prettier than the comic art, look hard enough and you can even get good free art of superhero characters!

Artists drawing idealized characters? Readers want to see perfect human bodies? Comic creators better do a good job, with advances in technology I can BE an idealized fictional character and actively decide my own stories. Comics can't rely on selling on such visual ideas and the fact that a lot of the big comic companies important decision makers seem to have outdated ideas and perspectives on the world and are supported by apologists who spend more time trying to justify why comics are the way they have been, instead of trying to keep the best parts of comics and advance to compete with the modern day and future is why majority of comics publishers are getting so desperate.

Cheesecake? Sexuality? Gratuitous sexiness, sex, nudity, etc Not bad things, not the same thing, just depends on what you are trying to do. If a writer and artist present a fully fleshed out female character with a lot of character and visual traits that a reader can idolize, relate to, empathize with, then having them wear something sexy has a different appeal and effect than them trying to wear something sexy all the time. When I say something sexy I mean something so sexy its impractical since some characters pull off sexy in any outfit. Now swap out female character for male character and same thing. A character who wears something impractical because its sexy all the time is going to attract and appeal to readers in a different way. Ditto comics that portray and involve gender and gender differences a certain way.

Conflicting wishes as far as readers go, surprisingly some white males aged 18 to 35 value some things like characterization, character types, plotting, originality, diversity, realism and other things more than sexy woman. So its a balancing act. I mean I love sexy woman, personally, and so I like sexy female characters in my comics, but my personal definition of sexy tends to be different from the majority, and I like my comics to have its fair share of sexy men, and unsexy men, and unsexy women, and body diversity, and character diversity, and costume diversity. Balancing act. What also might work for me, might not work for others. Try and cover bases without losing ground. Comics and comics fans? Many of their ideas and explanations and justifications? Why comics is losing ground.

Heh nothing wrong with being a feminist either. Its a word meant to convey a message, like all words. Like all words it can be hijacked/evolve/devolve with a multitude of reasons good and bad. I personally think you address a word/concept/label/group at its best, otherwise you end up in a world where its easy to take the cheap out and devalue everything and every word. No progress will happen if we cater to the most ignorant, angry, and unreasonable.

^Hates brevity

Also, female athletes very commonly do have small breasts. In fact, if you go extreme, and look at great female bodybuilders, most of the time, you can't tell they have breasts, if it weren't for the fact they had bra's on.

Breasts = primarily fatty tissue. What do athletes burn a lot of?

Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By SC  Moderator

@minigunman123 said:

^Hates brevity

Also, female athletes very commonly do have small breasts. In fact, if you go extreme, and look at great female bodybuilders, most of the time, you can't tell they have breasts, if it weren't for the fact they had bra's on.

Breasts = primarily fatty tissue. What do athletes burn a lot of?

^ Hates accurately identifying posters points and replies to posts with preset arguments.

Being fit doesn't automatically mean you have small breasts is the point, as evidenced to anyone who happens to be or knows a female athlete who still has relatively large breasts. Of course its not common, and naturally breast size can and often reduces with physical activity, weight loss etc, but how this happens affects actually different woman differently. So unless one is trying to be mundanely generic, speaking of how comics should represent minority/majority statistics or applying their own perspective subjectively... like for example I had an aunt who was a body builder so I knew a lot of female body builders and I won't speak for you, but it was easy to note their breasts and not because they were wearing a bra.

Avatar image for minigunman123
minigunman123

3262

Forum Posts

558

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By minigunman123

@SC said:

@minigunman123 said:

^Hates brevity

Also, female athletes very commonly do have small breasts. In fact, if you go extreme, and look at great female bodybuilders, most of the time, you can't tell they have breasts, if it weren't for the fact they had bra's on.

Breasts = primarily fatty tissue. What do athletes burn a lot of?

^ Hates accurately identifying posters points and replies to posts with preset arguments.

Being fit doesn't automatically mean you have small breasts is the point, as evidenced to anyone who happens to be or knows a female athlete who still has relatively large breasts. Of course its not common, and naturally breast size can and often reduces with physical activity, weight loss etc, but how this happens affects actually different woman differently. So unless one is trying to be mundanely generic, speaking of how comics should represent minority/majority statistics or applying their own perspective subjectively... like for example I had an aunt who was a body builder so I knew a lot of female body builders and I won't speak for you, but it was easy to note their breasts and not because they were wearing a bra.

^ Hates the fact I'm right.

I happen to have an uncle who's in the Mafia, doesn't mean anything.

Actually, this one time, anecdotal evidence meant something...

No.

Athletes have low amounts of what again?

You can do this.

And no, I'm not representing exceptions to rules, as that is inaccurate. Accuracy = majority. If comics want to be accurate, they should have the majority (like 80%) of their female superheroes have very small and shallow breasts.

Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By SC  Moderator

@minigunman123 said:

^ Hates the fact I'm right.

I happen to have an uncle who's in the Mafia, doesn't mean anything.

Actually, this one time, anecdotal evidence meant something...

No.

Athletes have low amounts of what again?

You can do this.

And no, I'm not representing exceptions to rules, as that is inaccurate. Accuracy = majority. If comics want to be accurate, they should have the majority (like 80%) of their female superheroes have very small and shallow breasts.

^ Gets upset easily and prefers to argue a person and not the actual argument.

If I assert that there are no uncles in the mafia then what you actually said means a lot as far as being relevant.

Athletes are all identical in body shape...?

Rob Schneider says you can do it too?

Your addressing me, what's your point? I am not saying that you are representing exceptions to the rules, so could you kindly actually address a point or points I make and please also try to not go off topic with personal remarks otherwise, yet again early warning I will reply to you in PM rather than drag this thread down. I'll reply to your on topic points in this thread - and any off topic points in PM. Cheers!

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#74  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator

People say "boobs sell" but in fact they don't. They never really have.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#75  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Yung ANcient One said:
I'm more into hips (+)
I'm more into legs.
Avatar image for decoy_elite
Decoy Elite

30159

Forum Posts

1875

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#76  Edited By Decoy Elite

@Vance Astro said:

People say "boobs sell" but in fact they don't. They never really have.

Well when I say it I more of mean that companies think they do.

Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By SC  Moderator

@Decoy Elite said:

@Vance Astro said:

People say "boobs sell" but in fact they don't. They never really have.

Well when I say it I more of mean that companies think they do.

Thats because those companies are made up of quite a lot of boobs. Even though I feel he is often unfairly demonized by the internet, but have you rubbed Brian Michael Bendis bald head before? Feels just like a soft pink flesh balloon filled up with sand - just like a real breast should feel like uh...

Avatar image for decoy_elite
Decoy Elite

30159

Forum Posts

1875

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#78  Edited By Decoy Elite

@SC: I have enjoyed much of Bendis's work.

I still agree that he is indeed quite the boob.

Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#79  Edited By akbogert

@minigunman123: But, like, we have a woman here who is an athlete saying she isn't flat-chested. No need for appeals to the convenient relative (not that it's fair to just assume everyone who says they have an aunt or uncle is lying). The point of this thread is to challenge stereotypes. We're really no better off if we say "all fit women have small breasts" because it's going to have exceptions to disprove it. I think it's fair to say that, while some sports may dictate different body types, on the whole the majority of fit women probably have smaller chests, and smaller chests than they would if they were to drop out of the sport.

I liked very much of what @SC said, but in particular:

I mean I love sexy woman, personally, and so I like sexy female characters in my comics, but my personal definition of sexy tends to be different from the majority, and I like my comics to have its fair share of sexy men, and unsexy men, and unsexy women, and body diversity, and character diversity, and costume diversity. Balancing act. What also might work for me, might not work for others. Try and cover bases without losing ground.

And the point about sexy character versus sexy clothing is definitely a strong one. I think the major reason that celebrity beach photos/private pictures are so sought-after and have such a big deal made over them is because we're used to seeing those people wearing clothing, so seeing what's underneath becomes a titillating experience. Once we know what's there, we lose interest. Bikini pictures are a big deal for every new bikini, but the moment an actress "goes nude" the rest fails to sell. You've got to wonder...if every (LEGAL) celebrity just did a naked photoshoot, would the paparazzi industry be half as successful? I kind of doubt it. For whatever reason, we're actually more turned on by the occasionally sexy outfit than by someone who is just showing off their wares at all times. Based on that, I think the industry would do well to have some more modest characters, so that when things got hot, it mattered.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#80  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Decoy Elite said:

Well when I say it I more of mean that companies think they do.

I don't think they do. I think artists simply draw women the way they visualize them. 
Avatar image for decoy_elite
Decoy Elite

30159

Forum Posts

1875

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#81  Edited By Decoy Elite

@Vance Astro said:

@Decoy Elite said:

Well when I say it I more of mean that companies think they do.

I don't think they do. I think artists simply draw women the way they visualize them.

Maybe, although you have to wonder how much of it is because of how past artists drew the characters effecting the future design of the character.

Avatar image for batnandez
Batnandez

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82  Edited By Batnandez

Yeah and most guys aren't built like Superman either. What's your point OP? Half of this country is full of fatsos, does that mean you want more fat people in your comics?

Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#83  Edited By SC  Moderator

@akbogert said:

And the point about sexy character versus sexy clothing is definitely a strong one. I think the major reason that celebrity beach photos/private pictures are so sought-after and have such a big deal made over them is because we're used to seeing those people wearing clothing, so seeing what's underneath becomes a titillating experience. Once we know what's there, we lose interest. Bikini pictures are a big deal for every new bikini, but the moment an actress "goes nude" the rest fails to sell. You've got to wonder...if every (LEGAL) celebrity just did a naked photoshoot, would the paparazzi industry be half as successful? I kind of doubt it. For whatever reason, we're actually more turned on by the occasionally sexy outfit than by someone who is just showing off their wares at all times. Based on that, I think the industry would do well to have some more modest characters, so that when things got hot, it mattered.

Thanks and great points with above. Emma Frost is a good character to use, in such conversations, because she is popular with a lot of female comic book fans, as well as male fans. The characters unashamed sexual confidence is for many a highlight of the character. Its not something that exploits the character (although that danger is there, like how her mini series about her being a young girl/in high school ended up having many covers with modern day Emma posed in extremely gratuitous shots by a well known pin up artist who style was extremely different from the interior artist) but a character like X-23 (I believe you are a fan ^_^) who has her own complicated history as far as sex goes, her personality and characteristics and character traits are very different to Emma's and both characters clothes, uniforms and even poses should reflect this. Diluting both characters by focusing on generic assets they bare - sexuality, female bits, it can backfire.

A good artist and writer can make a characters facial expression a very titillating experience, and I don't mean in the unintentional sense like maybe Greg Land's art... Blankets is a book by Craig Thompson, he was the writer and artist and his art was very basic and simple (and beautiful in its own way) and because he is dealing with two very normal characters, who he spends the majority of the book grounding and normalizing and fleshing out, the scenes to do with love and sex are very sensual and very raw despite being between two characters with literal dots for eyes. Simpsons characters have more details but still. The characterization and context was there.

Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#84  Edited By akbogert

@Batnandez: I think you're missing the point (which makes sense, since you actually asked "what's your point?"). The point is that no one is built like Superman. It's one thing for all superheroes to be super-athletic. It's another thing for them to all be super-athletic and supermodels.

As has been stated, there are obviously some busty female athletes, and there are some frighteningly-flexible male athletes, but on the whole the majority of comics' "idealized" versions of men and women aren't just perfect...they're impossible.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#85  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Decoy Elite said:

Maybe, although you have to wonder how much of it is because of how past artists drew the characters effecting the future design of the character.

For instance, artists like J.Scott Campbell,Frank Cho,& Ed Benes mostly always draw their female characters in a sexual manner and I don't think they need and push from the company that publishes the book to draw those women like that. I think that's just how it works. I think that artists choose how sexy they want to draw female characters. Benes' Wonder Woman is always very sexy but artists like Alex Ross,Cliff Chang,Darwyn Cooke and most times even Adam Hughes take a more majestic approach to her look rather than just focusing on sex appeal. I think it varies between artists.
Avatar image for decoy_elite
Decoy Elite

30159

Forum Posts

1875

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#86  Edited By Decoy Elite

@Vance Astro: Yeah I see what you mean. I think I prefer the majestic approach, but maybe that's just my inner prude.

Avatar image for biteme_fanboy
BiteMe-Fanboy

8951

Forum Posts

454

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#87  Edited By BiteMe-Fanboy

-_-....wut.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#88  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Decoy Elite said:

@Vance Astro: Yeah I see what you mean. I think I prefer the majestic approach, but maybe that's just my inner prude.

I like the majestic approach as well. It goes better with her style of character.
Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#89  Edited By akbogert

@SC: Great points all around. Regarding X-23, it's funny. I recognize that she is sexy, and her outfit is almost always somewhat revealing, but knowing her as a character, her history of abuse and prostitution...I don't know. I honestly don't even think about her in a sex way. The girl doesn't need bedroom action. She needs a hug.

I think the key is that the industry's operating in an outdated mode. Sure, there will always be a market for overt, over-the-top sexuality, just as there will always be guys that go for overtly slutty girls and overtly douchey guys. But I have to believe that at least a decent portion of the readership likes a little depth to their sexiness. I sure hope they do.

Avatar image for colonyofcells
colonyofcells

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90  Edited By colonyofcells

Not a feminist, but sex does sell well everywhere including comics and both males/females are being sold.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#91  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@colonyofcells said:

Not a feminist, but sex does sell well everywhere including comics and both males/females are being sold.

I don't think "sex sells well" in comics because the most comics with sexualized images don't sell and the ones that do are bottom tier at best.
Avatar image for evilvegeta74
evilvegeta74

4674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92  Edited By evilvegeta74

@Muckleflugasaid:

@pathtales: Totally agree with you, some of the ways female characters are drawn is ridiculous some of the costumes are crazy too!

Sorry for your injury, must have sucked :(

@pathtales What he said,but in the same token we are talkin comics here, fantasy, imagination etc..... these are things that help comics sell. I know some of it is not tasteful, but that's a part of the business, to generate large amounts of revenue.

:

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#93  Edited By Yung ANcient One

@Vance Astro said:

@Yung ANcient One said:
I'm more into hips (+)
I'm more into legs.

The way I see it, the hips ratio usually defines the *$$, and the legs usually follow the *$$. Besides that I honestly prefer hips. For a variety of reasons too, and I think the chest is a bit over rated.

Back to the Topic.

I kind of find it annoying too, that heroines have a ridiculous chest. I find it unattractive in women in general, when it obviously doesn't look natural. That's why I like Captain Marvels new costume. It's a actual costume, and not a swimsuit.

(+)

Avatar image for minigunman123
minigunman123

3262

Forum Posts

558

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By minigunman123

@akbogert said:

@minigunman123: But, like, we have a woman here who is an athlete saying she isn't flat-chested. No need for appeals to the convenient relative (not that it's fair to just assume everyone who says they have an aunt or uncle is lying). The point of this thread is to challenge stereotypes. We're really no better off if we say "all fit women have small breasts" because it's going to have exceptions to disprove it. I think it's fair to say that, while some sports may dictate different body types, on the whole the majority of fit women probably have smaller chests, and smaller chests than they would if they were to drop out of the sport.

I liked very much of what @SC said, but in particular:

I mean I love sexy woman, personally, and so I like sexy female characters in my comics, but my personal definition of sexy tends to be different from the majority, and I like my comics to have its fair share of sexy men, and unsexy men, and unsexy women, and body diversity, and character diversity, and costume diversity. Balancing act. What also might work for me, might not work for others. Try and cover bases without losing ground.

And the point about sexy character versus sexy clothing is definitely a strong one. I think the major reason that celebrity beach photos/private pictures are so sought-after and have such a big deal made over them is because we're used to seeing those people wearing clothing, so seeing what's underneath becomes a titillating experience. Once we know what's there, we lose interest. Bikini pictures are a big deal for every new bikini, but the moment an actress "goes nude" the rest fails to sell. You've got to wonder...if every (LEGAL) celebrity just did a naked photoshoot, would the paparazzi industry be half as successful? I kind of doubt it. For whatever reason, we're actually more turned on by the occasionally sexy outfit than by someone who is just showing off their wares at all times. Based on that, I think the industry would do well to have some more modest characters, so that when things got hot, it mattered.

First of all, I appreciate your interest in our (SC's and mine) small conversation, and thank you for your post; but first off, anyone stating anything about themselves or someone they "know" is anecdotal evidence, and while it may be relevant to some conversations, it is irrelevant here. They may be part of the exception you speak of, for another thing.

However, I wasn't trying to say "all athletic women have tiny, tiny boobs". I was saying, in fact, exactly what you said, that if you are athletic, you ahve a smaller chest; often, the more athletic and physically active, the smaller the boob size. This is due to having low body fat percentage (certain diets can help with this goal) and boobs being primarily fatty tissue.

I in fact did recognize there are exceptions, but I said that if DC or Marvel wanted to accurately portray their female heroes, the small-chested heroes should be the norm, rather than the exception as they currently are, and voluptuous women should be the minority of their heroes.

I think a lot of this is misunderstanding, and on SC's part a failure to comprehend (as he/she misunderstood other aspects of one of my posts as well), that led to this. All I'm saying is exactly what you're saying. Athletic = smaller chest, normally. If you are highly athletic and have a large chest as a woman, that is actually fairly abnormal.

Also, I think people enjoy the "occasional" hot picture rather than constant hot picture because that's how it remains mysterious and taboo to us, and humans tend to love the "forbidden fruit". Once we start seeing something a lot, it becomes less sensitive, less interesting, less appealing, to the human psyche. Not all experiences are normalized by frequent exposure (for example, seeing an actual murder happen in front of you might never become "normal" for your eyes to see), but it is the extreme norm for most things, such as seeing naked people, seeing violent movies, or swearing. Once we are exposed to it a lot, it becomes normal and not as interesting.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#95  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Yung ANcient One said:

Back to the Topic.

I kind of find it annoying too, that heroines have a ridiculous chest. I find it unattractive in women in general, when it obviously doesn't look natural. That's why I like Captain Marvels new costume. It's a actual costume, and not a swimsuit.

(+)

Why is it annoying? If by Captain Marvel, you mean Carol Danvers, she's still wearing skin tight leather and her boobs are huge. Her new costume doesn't look as much like a swimsuit as her new costume but you could say the same for Superman.
Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By SC  Moderator

Poster enters thread and makes an argument using anecdotal evidence that you can't see great female body builders breasts most of the time unless they are wearing bras. Another poster refutes this by establishing interactions and history with female body builders, and that pointing out that this may just be an issue of subjectivity on the person making the claims side, and cites their own subjective experience with female body builders. Poster accuses them of providing anecdotal evidence and failing to understand their points after severely misunderstanding original posters points.

@minigunman123 said:

All I'm saying is exactly what you're saying. Athletic = smaller chest, normally. If you are highly athletic and have a large chest as a woman, that is actually fairly abnormal.

This is what I said, except you didn't understand, which hey thats okay, but like 99% of our interactions in the past, you don't seem to understand and you seem to take it personally and keep replying to me even though you have a history of not understanding my posts. So please do not bring me up in your posts to other people and what I understand or don't understand because its just unnecessary. Address arguments not people. If something I said was too complicated or to strange for you yo understand? I apologize to you, however now that I am clearly stating females that engage in strenuous physical activity have relatively smaller breasts and are more common than female athletes with huge breasts who also engage in physical activity, I hope you can move on yes? Most especially move on from discussing me with other posters, and in the context of questioning what I understand and don't understand. Thank you.

Avatar image for minigunman123
minigunman123

3262

Forum Posts

558

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97  Edited By minigunman123

@SC said:

Awww... Adorable!

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#98  Edited By Yung ANcient One

Her new costume doesn't look as much like a swimsuit as her new costume but you could say the same for Superman.

Forgive me my doode, but I'm a little bit lost.

buttah

Why is it annoying?

It's kind of annoying like sorta... like like... it bothers me a tad bit. It is not a big deal, but I just find it so unnecessary. Plus it goes with deeper thought of ideas like what Lupe Fiasco said

"Then maybe you can grow up to be a stripperA welfare-receiving prostitute and gold diggerYou can watch on TV, how they should properly depict you."

This is a actual problem for me. Kids are growing up with the idea that women should be praised for their looks. I hate hearing my young cousin say, "Yeah I'm a Bad B!@#$%." to some deuce bag boy(who I would tear limb from limb), to impress him or something. It is a lot of things causing this mentality, and comics is a tiny probably insignificant thing that kind of annoys me if I think about it.

(+)

Avatar image for lykopis
lykopis

10845

Forum Posts

40100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99  Edited By lykopis

(aka minigunman123)

Quick. He's losing it again.

Avatar image for akbogert
akbogert

3323

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 31

#100  Edited By akbogert

Le sigh.

Despite all the arguing, it sounds like we're pretty much all in agreement with OP. Hopefully we've also recognized the fact that athleticism doesn't preclude large breasts, but does tend to make them less common.

Things which may or may not be understood:

- Anecdotal evidence makes up the majority of evidence for all things throughout history, and people who speak from personal experience are more likely to be telling the truth in the context of a levelheaded discussion than lying.

- I enjoy J. Scott Campbell's drawings, but probably wouldn't read a series illustrated entirely by him.

- Sexiness isn't just about boobs. We like to consider the person as a whole. Sometimes even their personality!