@poisonfleur said:
@CheeseSticks: Lol that doesn't help. That only shows which characters have been used already. lol Not which characters each studio has access to.
Just an FYI, since I happen to work in the entertainment industry on the legal side, in cases like this, it often happens that the major characters/franchises are determined up front, and if it is unclear as to whether minor characters/franchises fall under the terms of an agreement, it gets worked out later. This even happens with the discographies of songwriters when they switch labels - the companies and owner(s) have to come to an agreement based on time of recording, which songs were created while the artist was under a particular contract and etc. The only time all of the respective characters, trademarks and rights are determined up front is in the case of an outright buyout of a company or owner(s) rights to them, such as when Disney purchased Marvel Entertainment and acquired rights to all of Marvel's estimated 5,000 characters outright.
For example, it's likely that Namor, who is well known among comic book fans were never determined up front for the Fantastic Four or X-Men movie franchises because they are considered less important than other characters. If the next X-Men movie wanted to claim he was a mutant on the team, Fox would come into confrontation with Universal, who owns distribution rights for Namor, to see if Namor would fall under their license based upon each companies' respect agreements with Disney. On the flip side, Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver fall into more murky territory as they are both mutants but also identified with The Avengers. It is possible it was never indicated which franchise they were associated with; this probably could have been hashed out if they went ahead to make a Magneto-themed movie.
ETA: Interestingly, even the link provided by CheeseSticks can only say that Quicksilver would "likely" appear in a Fox production so this really hadn't been worked out yet.
Log in to comment