@scorpio_cassadine said:
@dshipp17 said:
@agent41 said:
@dshipp17: The current run is touching political and social themes. And i think that is good, because whatever you like it or not. Wonder Woman as a character is like a sjw in a way. Her character since day one included messages about equality, injustice, freedom, etc.
No, she or the writers going back to Azz have been trying to cater to a fan base or attract a certain type of fan base; that's not about getting into political themes; I think my last post was a little bit misunderstood.
No you're wrong. Azzarello was an attempt at attracting straight white males to Wonder Woman's title by avoiding progressive political themes, introducing traditional patriarchal elements, sullying the Amazons and flooding the book with men they could relate to. It worked, but at the same time it angered and alienated Wonder Woman's core fan base which mostly consists of liberals.
DC reversed this by rehiring Greg Rucka and allowing him to shift the book back to it's liberal roots. Then they hedged their bet by mandating James Robinson write a run completely about patriarchy where the focus was on Wonder Woman's relationships with her newly created brother, absentee father and Darkseid.
When that failed to please Wonder Woman fans DC announced a woman writer known for her progressive political leanings would take over the title and that's where we are now. I feel if G. Willow Wilson doesn't catch on and sway fans DC will swing the pendulum in the other direction and piss most of us off again.
Oh, yeah, you just reminded me; there was Rucka 2.0 after Azz; one thing that I didn't/don't like is Azz's decision to turn us so focused on the Olympians, but probably at the direction of editorial; he actually considered using Dr. Psycho, instead, which I liked; how much excitement would Azz have generated, if he'd actually used Dr. Psycho and the focused was now in that direction? It's no way that Wonder Woman could not be exiting now, unless they'd completely altered his character (e.g. removing his main problem involving his looks and women making fun of him because of his looks shaping his character; and being betrayed by women).
But, I disagree; Wonder Woman wasn't always a political character or catering to the fan base that DC is currently trying to draw (e.g. or, actually, having Wonder Woman focused on the Olympians to draw the impression that she was always solely soaked in the magical theme and was a warrior, when she wasn't, and is something started by Azz's run); that's a tune that's quite recent; Rucka 1.0 was the only other occasion when she was political/catering to this elusive set of fans; Phil may have made her political/catering too, in the current direction; anywhere else, including even Perez's run didn't have her political/catering towards the magic image; nothing in the pre-character era showed her that way, as a magical being. Marston made her scantly-clad for his time, and did the bondage, which I liked, but, that was liberating for women, at the time; and, then, the fan based that Perez possibly introduced, but, didn't really start latching on to her, until Rucka 1.0; and, that's what I'm disliking, as if that fan based somehow shaped Wonder Woman, when it was my fan base who liked Marston and Messner-Loebs that shaped her first, original, and loyal fan base which have been walked all over for quite some time now; it would have been very groundbreaking for Azz to have used Dr. Psycho, instead, and would have been a payoff for us for our long suffering patience with DC on Wonder Woman.
@agent41 said:
@scorpio_cassadine: @masterwitcher88: For that gww needs to polish her writing on Wonder Woman even more. There are some good ideas, but the execution is not the best so far imo. The pace is awful at times. And the power action moments are underwhelming most of the time. It has its moments, but overall the run is not strong enough, gww can do better. I hope things improve.
The real truth about the matter is above.
Log in to comment