when asked about writers NOT building on past wonder woman ideas Gail Simone responded
Yeah, absolutely true. I think part of it is that editorial hasn’t really found a version they believe in 100%.
Like, I was not allowed to use Greg Rucka’s brilliant version of the gods. Similarly, I’m sure writers were asked not to refer to my additions to the myth. Or maybe they just didn’t like them or didn’t read it, I don’t know.
But my entire plan was, EVERYTHING HAPPENED. My idea was that ever version of Wonder Woman was in the myth somewhere. So I tried not to negate previous stories, even if I thought those stories were awful.
In retrospect, I don’t know if that was a worthwhile idea. It took tremendous effort and it might have been baffling to newer readers. But I was proud that I didn’t tear things down to try to tell my stories.
There are two things I really wish new writers kept, maybe it’s vanity or maybe it’s because I think they are solid ideas.
One is, I think the origin story I had for Diana’s costume was very tight, and less convoluted than the previous one (which I still tried to keep in continuity). And I think having the island guarded by megalodons is a fun idea that makes a lot of sense. I can certainly see not keeping the gorillas, that could get tiresome over time, maybe.
The cool thing is, David Finch says he’s promised to bring the megs back, so THANK YOU, DAVID!
http://gailsimone.tumblr.com/post/125298509105/i-think-you-really-got-the-cookiness-that-marston
apparently DC has trouble finding how to approach her which is why i think there is so much of a problem trying to figure out who she is
Discuss.
Log in to comment