Okay say that Batman Beyond is coming out with a Christopher Nolan realistic style movie. Should he sport a cape in the movie? Here's an artist rendering.

http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2012/349/9/a/batman_beyond_by_rahzzah-d5o3uhe.jpg

I don't think he should wear one.

No. That would ruin the technology of his suit seeing as he doesn't need a cape.

I don't even see how a Beyond movie is feasible. The budget for it would be immense.

No, he shouldn't.

@parker_brothers:

No. They gave Batman a cape in the movie because that's what Bruce had in the comics.

To give Terry a cape would be like giving Spider-Man a cape it just wouldn't look right.

Hey, we can dream, can't we? :P

Batman Beyond shouldn't be a live action movie. It was a way to introduce Batman to a younger audience, get pre-teens into it if a high school kid became Batman. Keep the big movies for better ideas.

Would sorta ruin his whole look and wings.

No though the art looks awesome. Also if they make can Avengers then they can definitely make a Batman Beyond movie.

No Batman: TAS was meant to introduce Batman to a younger audience.

No, it should look more like this.

Nope.

@jonsmith said:

No, it should look more like this.

That... Looks... AWESOME!!

@battle_forum_junkie: I found that exact same image on Bing.

No

Bing? Who uses...bing? :P

@arturocalakayvee: Me I do!

only give him a cape when he flys.

The source material didn't have him wearing a cape. Therefore the film shouldn't have him wear a cape.