If there is one thing I hate more than people complaining about Superman's power-set and power levels, it's his comparison to Batman! Contrary to what my very first post implies, I love Batman a lot, but I can't help but laugh at the idea of him beating Superman in a fight even with kryptonite, but that isn't what I wish to discuss. I'm sick and tired of people saying that Batman is more relatable than Superman. I will admit, Batman is definitely more believable and plausible, but NOT relatable. People base this argument on the fact that Batman is human and Superman is an alien, completely disregarding the fact that it's your personality and upbringing that defines who you are; NOT your biology and lineage. And if you're willing to drop the heritage note for a second, I will prove to you why Superman is more relatable in regards to personality and upbringing. But to be fair, because Batman is the more popular hero these days, I'm going to start with him.
Bruce Wayne comes from one of the richest and most powerful families in the world. As a kid, he stood there and watched some random street punk gun his parents down, leaving him in a rather unparalleled state of trauma. When he is older, he, possibly using his parents' money by way of early inheritance, travels the world to learn all of these mental and physical disciplines before returning home to take over his family's multi-billion-dollar company. Essentially, the earlier years when Alfred was around aside, Wayne pretty much raised himself. While he pretends to be an irresponsible and ignorant industrialist, he is in truth a hardened, stern, cynical, serious, and deceptively stoic individual, but he still CLEARLY has a kind heart. And lets not forget he deals with loss and grief in the form of allies and lovers dying, but tends to hide it from everyone VERY well.
Clark J. Kent has lived on a Kansas farm for as long as he could remember, which means he has a very strong work ethic. That aside, like average people, he had chores (farm chores excluded), went to public school, occasionally had bullies (like in the old Superboy comics and the Man of Steel movie) and girl problems (he was oblivious to Lana's feelings and wasn't the hottest guy around compared to others), and even though he went to college, he still ended up with a common job: a reporter. At times, Kent seems to be a wimpy and clumsy man (or in other adaptations a very assertive and outgoing man), but we all know he has high moral standards and cares a great deal about everyone, even his enemies, because of Ma and Pa. What ALOT of people don't know is that his awareness of being an orphaned immigrant weighs heavily on him. He knows full well those kindly farmers aren't his true parents and while he will always love them like any adoptive child would, also like any adoptive child, he must constantly face the reality that he will NEVER meet his true parents and cannot truly bond with his friends in the League, as they cannot understand him the way he needs to be understood. There's no one else like him so to some degree, he will always feel like a lonely outsider. Every adoptive child has wondered about their families and even cultures in the case of those from another country; it's really no different for him.
Now, tell me. Whom is more relatable? A man who deals with trauma and loss by fighting for what's right in a rather brutish but necessary fashion? Or a man who deals with his status as a lonely orphan while fighting for what's right despite what some (and definitely not all) have to say about him and his status as an immigrant? Sound off below, please.
Log in to comment