@theacidskull said:
@dernman said:
@theacidskull said:
@dernman said:
There is nothing wrong with the character the way he is and he handles headlining his own book just fine. It's ok for some characters not to have continuous ongoing books. Sometimes it's better to split them up in smaller series and just focus when you have a story for them. In fact I think it would be a good idea for that to happen more often with characters. With Punisher this actually suits the character better IMO.
Well, not exactly. I wouldn't have mind if marvel had allowed Rucka to go on with his series, I mean, we've seen Garth reach 60 issues before, and that's only in the Max universe. I don't think Punisher is one of the characters that needs small titles with breaks.
I didn't say any character need anything. If you have the story and the sales then by all means go forward. I'm just saying there isn't anything wrong with shorter cycles and certain characters can work better that way as apposed to the Super, Bat, Spider books that can go years and years.
Edit: I believe that too many people think that because books don't go as long as those book they're failures. I just don't agree with that.
I've never heard anyone say that before. Could you elaborate a bit?
Not sure. Words seems to be failing me at the moment.
I'll try. I've seen over a long period and involving different talks that people seem to think that the successes are books like Bat, Super, and Spidy. That those like Punisher, Moon Knight, and many others are failures because they don't or can't maintain constantly hold in their ongoing.
No that didn't work. I just repeated myself. hmmm
I've seen many act like those who're not long term are not successes. That because companies use different standards and model for certain books that they're failures.
Take the op for example. ( wow just noticed it was posted 2 years ago) "think about it, if he can't headline his own book,"
How exactly has he not held his own book? Sure his runs are shorter and might not do so well if they went longer but so what? I consider them successful title holders. They just use a different business model and approach. Instead of having one looong consistent runs they're broken up into many smaller runs of various sizes.
Sorry not explaining myself right.
Log in to comment