@jacdec: My response was a two part sentence. The first part contained a direct answer, using your own words, while the second part was an inquiry on how you could possibly be confused when you yourself already gave the answer.
The remarks are designed to appear inappropriate to outside observers even though they are well understood by the protagonists. We are in the order of private joke.
So… mutual trolling that both were in on. Okay… I mean it’s still a weird, but I already said I’d be willing to give benefit of the doubt for this sort of answer, so… *Shrugs*
What, on the other hand, you haven't told me is the reason that makes you so reactive to the exchanges I had with her.
You just admitted that your remarks were “designed to appear inappropriate”, in other words… elicit a reaction… but you’re confused by someone being reactive to them?
@jacdec: lol, kind of deflecting from the actual issue at hand, don’t ya think?
I mean, as I said, I’m fully willing to give benefit of the doubt. If you said it was all just a troll that you were both in on, or that you‘re actually not much older than her stated age, or even just that you got too caught up in the online personas and impersonal text interactions (though I think the sheer persistence of it all, as well as the fact that you saw what she supposedly looks like, is a little bit much for that excuse), I’d just shrug my shoulders and move on.
The guy who claims he's like 60 something, yet would consistently follow around a user, who was supposedly a minor, simping and making inappropriate comments?
And if there was any doubt about the nature of his comments:
I mean, I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt and say neither are the ages they claimed and that perhaps it was all just mutual trolling that both were in on, but uh... I dunno if I'd be willing to rate a “10” given the above. lmfao
Log in to comment