@Louisiana Bob: I spent time explaining why its an invalid feat to support the claim. You've contributed nothing to the argument and persist with insults.
@Louisiana Bob: Of course you didn't read it, you haven't read anything I've said. You consistently ignore the fact the movie takes place in the South Galaxy that was "destroyed". You consistently blabber on with insults as opposed to supporting the claim made. You consistently ignore that what was shown, doesn't support your claim. You also continually misrepresent what I'm saying.
So until you can defend your claim properly, there is no reason to accept it.
" lol i'm sorry but your proof is a rotating galaxy.......
What don't you get? Its your claim and your burden of proof. When evidence is provided, we see a rotating Galaxy disappear and the narration says the Galaxy was shattered.
so what you're saying is it took broly hundreds of millions of years to do what he did to the south galaxy...
You are saying that Galaxy is a literal representation of what happened. That is what you are saying to support your claim.
King kai didn't know goku was alive..that proves he didn't see...
No it tells us that you have another Burden of Proof, you were trying to ignore with King Kai. Thus King Kai is not evidence to support the ridiculous claim you've made.
the burden of proof is not on me or anyone else as they showed the galaxy being wrecked.
Yes it is, when what was shown is obviously flawed and there is no reason to believe it was what happened.
of something that was shown on video, try coming up with your own proof/ counter evidence
No, your video isn't just accepted because you can find it. Especially when there are obvious flaws between the claim and what was shown.
i'm seriously laughing. This..this is funny XD
Whats laughable is you trying to reverse the burden of proof. Everything in the movie suggest that opening scene was a dramatization of what really happened.
Thus the feat you are using isn't valid and you are trying to pass it off as tho it was. If we were to accept what we saw Broly took a lot of time doing what you claim.
@Louisiana Bob: First, its your claim that Broly is a Galaxy buster. That is the claim and your burden of proof. The feat itself shows a rotating Galaxy, passage of time in years. Which does not support your claim. Thus you have failed your burden of proof and we can reject Broly as the Galaxy buster people claim. King Kai went nearly a year thinking Goku was dead when Namek exploded.(and he monitored its destruction)
I'm rejecting the claims being made, and you are trying to pin the Burden of Proof onto me. It doesn't work that way.
Broly was introduced in the first movie by a Kai sensing a galaxy being wiped out and destroyed, and eventually it's discovered that Broly was the cause. You can refer to the youtube videos shown above, i'm sure one of them shows the beginning. "
King Kai wasn't sensing its destruction, he was sensing for the South Galaxy and he said it was as he feared and its all gone.(Which was Hyperbole) Then later he explained to Goku most of the South Galaxy had been destroyed and when Broly finished he would come to the North Galaxy.
@Louisiana Bob: Burden of Proof, the Feat shows a passage of years. If we saw Gotenks fly around the world and the seasons were changing we wouldn't assume he did it in real time.
However, you've ignored this concept and stated your not reading these posts.. so, I guess this is for people that are reading the discussion.
@Louisiana Bob: No I didn't, I said the video showed a rotating Galaxy which is inconsistent with claims that Broly is a Galaxy buster. Nothing any of the characters say back up your argument. Quite the opposite, we have King Kai stating the Galaxy wasn't destroyed, and the narrator says shattered. They also show up in the South Galaxy to confront Broly.
So we have no reason to believe the Galaxy was destroyed and we have evidence of passage of time from the "feat" itself.
The clip feat itself shows a passage of time. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate why your claim is true.
As for the accusations of Trolling I think your posts speak for you.. I'll let the mods decide, my fault for feeding your behavior.
Log in to comment