Thousandhorse

Sorry folks, honestly until I see info capable of changing my opinion I'm not going to. I truly believe Batman can and would win. Why are you becoming hostile over this? It's just a comic book thread. haha. If you can't take it, why come back? I am going to still be here and I'm still believing in the Bat.

Off myself? Has this degenerated into pleas for death now? Haha. The Stark camp could use some prozac. Batman still wins.

We can go for 8 if you like. Look, if you can't take the difference of opinion, just dont look at the thread. If anyone here can prove to me that Stark would hands down win, I would concede. The fact remains that no matter what, Iron man wouldn't be the best man to ever lose to Batman.

Oh boy, simply the fact that Batman has that armor on in the first place denotes that he has prepared. He doesn't just walk about with it on normally. He beat Superman both with and without the armor and the Hulk without it. Face the facts. Batman has the special power of being a winner. That's all Ive got to say really. If that's not enough, I dont know what is.

I can send a link to DC's website where they describe him as "Gradually training his Mind and Body to the peak of Human perfection while studying under the best criminologists, detectives and fighters the world had to offer", if anyone is interested. I have a feeling that wouldnt really matter though. Also, important to note that in JLA Tower of Babel, Ras Al Gul used Batman's weaponry to completely dominate the JL. If his weaponry is enough to take down The Justice LEague, then why not Iron Man, too?

Wow, I had totally forgotten. This thread actually has Batman in the Bat-Armor. Wow. So does that mean he's allowed to be wearing it for a reason, thus knowing he's going to be fighting Iron Man and allowing him to be strategically ready as well? Or do we take it to mean he's kind of just wearing it at a picnic or something? Wearing the Bat-armor generally means, that he knows he's in for a knock down drag out brawl. The Batman Armor took out Supes and would do the same here. Batman is the most skilled hand to hand fighter there is and in the JLA, Batman is even called the most dangerous man on Earth. As for being in the vehicles, why would he need to? He'd probably just use them as a diversion or for fire support anyway, which he can do remotely. But hey, he's got the Bat-Armor back now, so it's all good. He wouldn't need them. That would be cheating and he wouldn't have any reason to do that. Thanks, Gambler.

oh, he can call it from 100 feet away? Well that changes everything. So is it just chilling 100 feet away waiting for him to need it? Sure, makes sense to me too. Should we forget then that all the Bat-vehicles can be remote accessed by Bats at any time from anywhere? Might as well. That would just make it seem too lop sided in Batman's favor and that would be cheating, yeah? Batman also has use of high frequency blades that can supposedly chop through just about anything, even thin armor gasp and not to mention DC considers him their best hand to hand fighter to boot. But then, that's probably just the writing too, so we should just forget that as well. Iron Man wins.

Ok. Let's rename this fight to what we're really going for. Batman vs being at ground zero in a sudden nuclear attack without warning. That is basically what I'm seeing. haha. Batman dies. woo hoo!

Wow. This is getting pretty silly now. OK, we seem to forget that writing is mainly what Batman IS. Batman is a heroic adventure character. That's just what he is and it would seem that even though he may not actually have any powers, he has the uncanny ability to come out on top pratically no matter what. The tricky thing here to me is that we arent stating who the attacker is, either. Is Ironman just ganking Batman without warning. Because in that case, he could just slam into him like a missile unexpectedly and that would hurt the Bat enough to do the deed. Or is it Batman who is ganking Iron Man with an infallible plan of action? But that's not a fight. If we are wanting a fight to see what these characters can do, they need to be able to represent themselves accurately. Why should we allow Stark the use of Nukes, Satellites, and even his armor for that matter and Batman can't even use his special task Bat-Gear? So, is it a fight with no preparation at all? Does that mean the Bruce and Tony see each other at a restaurant one night and just lay into each other like two rutting gorillas? With no prep also comes no Armor or gear for either, which would leave Batman at a decided advantage. I mean, come on. Is it fanboyism to want fair and accurate representation?

No point in "debating" here now. Certain people would rather just make a bold claim with no comic backing and then yell and stomp when you don't agree. haha. pals?