@bladeoffury: Well if your asking for spoilers I'll give them to you.
Surtur beat Hella whom was essentially invincible, destroyed Asgard city with ease and oh planet busted the whole of Asgard. The ONLY chance the team has is knocking his crown off his head and Hulk wasn't even denting it so I don't see that happening before he planet busts.
Invincible is a strong word. Doomsday is said to be unkillable, but that doesn't make him so, does it?
How big is Asgard? Visually, it isn't bigger than a city:
It is likely that a nuke can replicate Surtur's feat, which Clark survived and Doomsday absorbed, becoming even more powerful.
Also, I hear Surtur doesn't have any good durability feats, so he might have trouble handling Superman's and Doomsday's heat vision, punches, and Diana's sword.
trying to lowball Surtur and wank the DCU isnt helping your case..Face it there are characters they wont overcome and Surtur is one of them
1) to continue his reign in the slave/planet trade business and expand his empire
2) most importantly he wanted to immortality to quell his fear and paranoia of being rebelled against and killed by a higher power which is why he committed mass genocide against the Saiyans in the first place
If Goku didn't escape this series wouldn't have happened
"But it's accurate because he's a teen" you clearly have troubles with reading comprehension. Saying Holland is the most accurate because he's a teen doesn't make your argument true considering Peter has been an adult and has gotten married. That's also accurate so your argument wasn't necessary.
Also what did Holland do that Tobey and Garfield missed? Act bashful and starstruck? Display intelligence feats? What did he do in his limited screentime that makes you believe he was better? Also i can pull up scan after scan of Peter being attractive. He's not an ugly guy. The same dude who gets more women of quality than any of us in reality. The only knock on Garfield is him being a skateboarder
So what qualifies as someone who gets picked on? Should Parker be a buck toothed zit faced nerd with suspenders and have pencils in him breastpocket? What qualifies him as a "nerd"? What should he look like? You more than likely don't even know. Plenty of people get bullied and don't look like a stereotypical "nerd"
And don't even try to put words in my mouth short stack. I never said disregard 60's comics. I said don't think they are the only ones that exist. Peter Parker has been in existence for over 60+ years. Character development and change is bound to happen
So explain in a non convoluted way how Holland did what Tobey and Andrew couldn't.
He was entertaining and a good choice but the best representation? Hell no and it's disrespectful to the previous two to even claim
This isn't the case where most Batman actors were crap so picking Bale or Keaton isn't hard to do. Spider Man has had good representations to each character they were going for. Holland had only 20+ minutes on screen. That's not even close to the amount to consider him the best at anything
@frownland: Disagree with Garfield. He clearly displayed Peter's snark and intelligence numerous times. His nerdy mannerisms with Doc Conners when working on his formula or doing things like homework upside on his bedroom wall
That is stuff I see comic Peter doing.
People need to stop with these myths of Parker and read an issue or at least look at scans. Peter can be rude nosy and a smartass. He's insulted numerous people and also humiliated Flash Thompson. Also in a grand display of arrogance he casually strolls to the Baxter Building and demands to fight the FF4 so he could be given a spot on the team.
Not sure why people still stick this "nerdy awkward shy" label on him and pretend that's all Peter is when it's clearly not. He's been a character for over 60+ years. There's this thing called "character development" maybe you've heard of it?
I didn't even mention the amount of women the guy gets. This isn't the 60's anymore and even then he flirted with Liz and Betty numerous times
Saying Holland was the best is objectively false.
Oh and I don't want to see any crap like "He's the most accurate because he's a teen"
Right because it's not like Peter never grew up and was never an adult in the CW storyline... Oh wait...
@zaied: give actual stats regarding The Patriots defense during the three Super Bowl runs.. Their stats were anything but great. And add to the fact that Belichick and his pro bowl QB Bledsoe had a losing record before Brady stepped in. You want to lowball Brady by naming his teammates but let's look at what Manning had at his arsenal
Chris Harris Jr
Don't give Manning a pass..
Brady is objectively the more consistent winning. Facts are facts