I clearly explained that neither of us could fully prove our point.
I disagree. The proof is shown on screen clearly by feats in IW. That's why I kept debating and your "may" have to agree to disagree did not point to you being completely done.
@rr79: You stated we "may" have to agree to disagree. As in, maybe or might have to. To me, that doesnt seem like some one who is completely set on ending the debate.
It wasn't till after that you said either agree to disagree or get blocked.
@rr79: Yeah, while being a complete prick and threatening to block me and @rebake in the process. Funny that you bring up respect. If you were more respectful yourself it might be reciprocated.
@rr79: You first tagged me and I've been responding to you ever since. I was getting those same notifications. Why dont you take your own advice, be and adult, and stop tagging me if you dont want to further this conversation. You are the one who is getting hostile with some one debating with you on a DEBATING forum.
I am talking specifically about Infinity War. Nothing anywhere implies he was amped in any way.
The fact that Cap took virtually the same punch BP took w/suit implies Cap's blunt force durability increased, or amped.
Your argument was that it doesn't make since for Caps physicals to increase like IM or Thors. I showed you that the MCU and the Russo's decided to push Caps physical capabilities higher with out explaining it anyway.
There is nothing for me to prove, the evidence is already given to us on screen by feats. There was no indication that one punch was weaker then the other punch. Both punches are virtually identical to one another.
Log in to comment