Two things:
Anakin was already a child killer when he went to Mustafar, Obi-Wan however, as a Jedi, he still had a moral code, and he was fighting against his ''brother'' ...
Kenobi's hindrance > Anakin's hindrance
Obi-Wan wasn't as hindered as Anakin:
In the ROTS novel, Kenobi lets go of his attachment of Anakin, and fights him like anyone else (pretty much):
The man he faced was everything Obi-Wan had devoted his life to destroying: Murderer. Traitor. Fallen Jedi. Lord of the Sith. And here, and now, despite it all... Obi-Wan still loved him.Yoda had said it, flat-out: Allow such attachments to pass out of one's life, a Jedi must, but Obi-Wan had never let himself understand. He had argued for Anakin, made excuses, covered for him again and again and again; all the while this attachment he denied even feeling had blinded him to the dark path his best friend walked.
Obi-Wan knew there was, in the end, only one answer for attachment...
He let it go.
Source: Revenge of the Sith
The ultimate visual guide states that Obi-Wan letting go drastically altered the fight (which implies that if Obi-Wan had fought hindered, he would have died).
As every step becomes more perilous and Vader's attacks more ferocious, Obi-Wan realizes that he still cares for Anakin, and that the only way he can defeat his opponent is to let go of his feelings for his former friend. When Obi-Wan releases this emotional attachment, the battle turns for the Jedi.
Source: The Ultimate Visual Guide
Infact, TRODV makes it even more obvious what Obi-Wan's state of mind was:
Obi-Wan triumphed because he went to Mustafar with a single intention in mind: to kill Darth Vader.
Source: Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader
Whereas Anakin was described as vulnerable:
Anakin had still been between worlds then, and vulnerable.
Source: Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader
And even then only lost due to overconfidence/stupidity:
It was Anakin's overconfidence, fueled by the dark side, which led to his defeat. A mistimed leap over Obi-Wan allowed him to swiftly cut Anakin, leaving him disabled on the shore of a lava river.
Source: Lightsabers: A Guide to the Weapons of the Force
So, no, Obi-Wan was not the more hindered (Infact, he ranges from losing his hindrance, and never being hindered). BTW, I don't know why you used Anakin killing children as a reason why he would be less hindered. Anakin didn't want to kill them, if anything it would just add to his guilt (unless you think Anakin had no conscience
Sort of... Palpatine doesn't shoot people with lightning when his back is turned. That's not the best way to shoot someone with lightning, I think you would agree with me on this. So it's obvious that Palpatine wasn't at his best there. Vader cheap-shotted him from behind, and nerfed Palpatine's lightning still manages to kill him.
Darth Vader had just lost his hand, and had alot of exposed circuitry. I think it's arguable that this is part of the reason why the lightning killed him.
Log in to comment