I agree that they're different, but the Usain Bolt vs Bruce Lee argument is kinda dumb in my opinion. It's okay, I've made this argument before, but this would only prove that they're different, which are obvious. The purpose of the thread is to scale combat speed from travel speed, and the comparison does not help at all. Why? Because clearly, Usain Bolt can react to his own running speed. Even an average human should be able to react to Bolt's running speed, but they can't run nearly as fast. Adding Bruce Lee into the equation would just prove that you can even go beyond that when you're trained.
A Usain Bolt argument can be made, but they're not utilizing it properly. A better way of phrasing it would be to ask of Usain automatically has the fastest reactions on the planet just based on the speed at which he runs a 40? That's what this theory suggests, but obviously not seeing as they're two entirely different things. The speed at which you can run doesn't correlate to the speed your brain processes information, and your body reacts to it. If that were the case the fastest receivers in the NFL would have better hands (ability to catch the ball) than slower receivers, but foot speed doesn't tell us how your body reacts to outward stimuli.
In real life I would assume someone who has a lot of fast twitch muscle has a greater chance of having better reaction time than some average joe, but it's clearly not a direct trade off. That's why we can't take a principle like this and apply it to fictional beings.
(edit) Also bring Bruce Lee into any argument about any form of athleticism is corny. Ya'll are corny.
Log in to comment