nomadicxnightmare

This user has not updated recently.

153 5 54 28
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

nomadicxnightmare's forum posts

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

@Mr.Q said:

they need to stop putting wrestlers in places they don't belong. find actors to act.

I think there is a fatal flaw in your statement. Under normal circumstances I would tend to agree with you; too often wrestlers are thrown willy nilly into film for no good reason other than simple recognition sake and to attract a certain type of audience. Typically they are given the 'lunk-ish' and lackluster roles, bringing nothing of significant value to the movie as a whole (I'm looking at YOU Triple H!). However, IMO, there is more of a reason now to start looking at these muscle men as potential actors, and that is the rise of the superhero genre. As comic book movies grow in popularity and larger casts of characters are explored for silver-screen debuts, there are going to be some characters, like Drax, which demand a more imposing individual to bring them to life. What I mean by that is, an actor, no matter how talented or skilled they may be, need to not only be capable of fulfilling the role but physically make themselves believable as the character. A lot of these characters we, as comic book fans, have very strong pre-conceptions as to how they should look, and if the resulting expectations are not met, the film suffers to an extent.

Let me give some examples to maybe better illustrate my point. In the original X-men movie they cast Tyler Mane as Sabretooth. Sadly, the writing of his role was lack-luster and all he really accomplished was to get kicked around by Wolverine, but they didn't cast Mane for his acting skills. They cast him for his large, tall, and imposing figure. He looked good as Sabretooth and, if they had given him more than one or two lines, I think he could have made the character very believable based on his physique. Nothing Oscar winning I assure you, but it would have worked. And guess what? He was a wrestler at one point too. Now take Liev Schreiber in Origins: Wolverine. He's a decent enough actor. And although this version of Sabretooth had more to say, he did not in any way shape or form physically fit my expectations of how Creed should look and, as a result, I couldn't take him seriously (but then again, I couldn't take that movie seriously to begin with).

On the other side of the fence, let face it, there are not that many talented actors who are good at what they do AND can fit the physical requirements of what we expect from comic book heroes. How many really good actors can you think of off the top of your head that are not just fit, but ripped? I was honestly initially worried about Chris Hemsworth begin cast as Thor. At first all I could think was 'You mean that skinny guy from Star Trek?' Granted, I like Hemsworth and he did bulk up quite a bit to play Thor. He acted well and managed to deliver a believable performance. But truthfully he's still on the scrawny side when it comes to Gods of Thunder. He's got good height, but I have always pictured Thor with the Schwarzenegger-ish build, because that's how he is always portrayed in the comics. Tom Hardy as Bane, while fitting quite nicely in Nolan's more 'grounded' Batman epic, in my mind is way to short to be a proper Bane. One terrorizing part of Bane in the comics is the fact that, even when not on venom, he physically towered over Bruce Wayne and could give him a run for his money in a fight. Chris and Tom ended up being good picks for their respective roles, but who else could have been cast to fit the build? If we're going strictly by looks, some wrestlers do come to mind.

All and all I think people should give wrestlers turned actors a bit more slack. They fit into a certain type-cast that most regular actors can't touch physically. A lot should never see the big screen due to poor acting skills, but some are not bad either. Even Dwayne Johnson is entertaining when he's making fun of himself (Rundown, Be Cool, etc.) And really, how important is Drax's role going to be in the upcoming movie? He's there to kick @ss and take names, not deliver inspiring speeches or move you to tears. Agreed, Bautista would not have been my first pick (did they even ASK Diesel?!?), but for the purposes of the character I think he'll do alright and make Drax look like the intimidating S.O.B. that he is.

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#2  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

@nappystr8 said:

I don't think Bautista is a bad choice. But any choice other than Vin Diesel would be the wrong choice.

Exactly!!!

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

I can see Bautista in the role. Glad they didn't go with Momoa... That guy just needs to be stopped before he plays any more one-dimensional characters. Personally I always thought Vin Diesel was born to play Drax and I could swear Drax during Annihilation was inspired by the Riddick movies.

@Night Thrasher said:

@morehouse92 said:

He looks the part, as long as he doesn't have to say much he should be good.

This

QFT

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#4  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

Hey G-man, thanks for continuing with the 'Ask G-man' videos. They have become a favorite part of my week. A couple of questions for you:

1) Have you heard any information about possible cast selection for the Guardians of the Galaxy movie? Who do you think would be good actors to play Starlord, Gamora, etc.? Personally I think Vin Diesel was born to play Drax; his Annihilation incarnation screamed Riddick!

2) Do you think the constant hero vs. hero stories and big crossovers (Marvel in particular, but DC also) are the result of a lack of exceptional villains? With a few notable exceptions (Batman, Spiderman), IMO there never seems to be enough well conceived and challenging villains for heroes to face. Some books I really have a hard time reading because the rogue galleries are so lack luster, overused, or not challenging enough (Superman, Daredevil). Others, the actual good villains end up becoming so popular the writers reform them and become they heroes/anti-heroes (Magneto, Venom), defeating their original purpose. What do you think it would take for writers to start creating new legitimate and memorable villains and get the heroes back to fighting worthy bad guys?

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#5  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

@Whiskeyjack said:

Not a fan. Would prefer this content stay firmly in the Battles forum.

At least this article was written well and took into account the strengths and weaknesses of the characters, coming to a very logical conclusion. Personally I despise the battle forums because a) there is far too much trolling ('arguments' that lead to nowhere) and b) most of the time the 'victorious' combatant is seemingly determined by popularity rather then facts (Storm fans anyone?). I was actually pleasantly surprised by the conclusion of this article and I agree with it 100%. As much as I like Batman and thought Nolan's movies were fantastic, Dredd's single-minded determination, ability, arsenal, and willingness to kill would win him the day. Saying 'Batman wins because he's Batman' is simply fans basking in denial when faced with the facts.

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#6  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

And this is just another reason why reboots are such a bad idea... I might be in the minority here, but I honestly wish Barb had never got back out of the chair. She had developed so much as a character since the Killing Joke and I thought her Oracle persona was far more interesting in comparison to her time as Batgirl. Plus she was one of the few mainstream disabled heroes out there; still kicking ass while overcoming all odds. Now we're basically back at square one... Thanks DC for butchering character history and development that was better left as it was.

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

@Smart_Dork_Dude said:

Am I the only one that thinks Iron Man was made, unintentionally of course, for selling action figures?

^This man speaks TRUTH! But who's to say it was really unintentional? xD

In all seriousness though, the stealth suit looks killer. I actually like the big suit too, though admittedly it seems really impractical. Makes you wonder who he's going toe to toe with... in Paris no less!

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#8  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

I think this is kinda a no-brainer here... Unless Uncanny gets a better expanded roster, Cable wins.

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By nomadicxnightmare

@CapFanboy said:

@Project_Worm said:

@CapFanboy: Wait! You wrote non serious fic's? When?!

Since now!!

Blasphemy!!!

Avatar image for nomadicxnightmare
nomadicxnightmare

153

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

28

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Hey Cappie, I'll trade out Sarah Connor for Marv from Sin City