@krleavenger: @amethystgravity: Ok, after reading this again I have to say this was awesome debate. Both of you used your characters really good and I can't criticize any one of you. Although some people say how @krleavenger didn't counter Samus's canons but explained why he wins. Actually I think he did, he explained Iron-man's feats. I think he used composite Iron-man because he didn't know how strong Samus is so he wanted to use all feats for Iron-man to be sure, which I think, since both of you made great debate which was friendly from the start, I think it only comes down to what character wins. Just to point out that @amethystgravity did counter everything KA said but KA didn't because that wont be fair. However he still had the last post so I think it would be the best if he countered and than both of you made the fourth post without countering. But we have to work with what we have. In the end, I think Iron-man from Model 1 to Model 52 is a little overkill for Samus. It would be more 50/50 if he didn't use Endo-Sym and Bleeding Edge feats. After seeing that last post with Iron-man's speed, the one with rocket being close to hit him and it was like an inch close, and explosion in a car, it reminds me of Fox Quicksilver feat from Apocalypse Movie which I think was moving at light speed so porbably iron-man did the same and it looks more impressive to me than Samus's feats. I don't know if a missed something but Iron-man has advantage in speed, strength, durability and energy projection and weapons so I have to give my vote to @krleavenger. And he did counter Samus canons in some way, just showed his speed and that feat with destoryed Sol's Hammeris a little bit overkill.