monarch_prime's forum posts

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#1 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

Lannister. Better fighter plus his armour. It's was already stated in the books a couple of times how Dothraki fail against armour, most notably when Barristan fought those Dothraki (can't remember their names at the moment). Drogo the over-hyped gets shredded.

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#2 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

@zaied said:

Blue Beetle. Mismatch.

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#3 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

@monarch_prime said:

Blue could potentially drain his energy.

No Caption Provided

Not only that, but if he hits Blue, Blue could send the energy of the punch back at him, IIRC.

Or absorb the momentum.

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#4 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

Blue could potentially drain his energy.

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for monarch_prime
#5 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

@wyldsong: Sure, I'll try. Philip designed a fusion reactor that generates a micro black hole for the purpose of igniting fusion. The black hole would spin dragging space time along with it and during the process, Hydrogen atoms would be introduced, which at those speeds would form a miniature sun around the black hole. Bently sabotaged the experiment, causing them to be sucked into the black hole. While inside he was dying at light-speed, but he was still able to experience different stages of his life and at a certain event, he wished he could change his actions then and he did. He didn't understand how though. Apparently he was thrust so deep into reality, that he could see it's foundations, interact with it. Hopefully the scans can clear this up more.

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#6 Edited by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for monarch_prime
#7 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

Solar will wreck.

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#8 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

@monarch_prime: @monarch_prime: @monarch_prime:

And what association says it is just attack like idiot, don't think. Tell me what is this all wise mural that verifyes this? Where does that say about it? There is like 2/3 of the battles in CV that goes with bloodlusted. Are all those battles really in same reason of that they just rush in to get facehammered by others because they are too irrational to think?

You still haven't profound what the bloodlust is officially, just your oppinion. Morals off might make them use the abbliities quck and effienct but still bloodlust is desire to kill not to go mindless, and mostly that desire is emotional from other case like love or hate. That is not the case in here. It is just and pure desire to kill. It maybe can derange the character or not, but in these battles it is not the point.

Mine is an opinion while yours is what, factual? I gave examples of what bloodlust is, you're yet to provide any to suggest that it isn't. Show me a clear differentiation between Morals off and bloodlust then. Okay let me just use this crude example. You're going to kill someone in front of you in a crowd, in this situation you lack any morals. You observe their actions, look for an opening when their alone and then you take your chance. Say you want to kill the same person while bloodlusted, completely pissed off at the very sight of them. You don't want to observe what their doing, you just wanna bash their face in so you grab what's closest to you without thinking of the consequences and you proceed to bash said face in. Only after the act do you appreciate what you've done, but during the impulse, you just wanted to bash their face in. Get it?

Avatar image for monarch_prime
#9 Posted by monarch_prime (469 posts) - - Show Bio

@monarch_prime said:

@hiddenlight said:

@direflash said:

@monarch_prime:

So tell me, what is the official description of bloodlusted? I think morals off character is just a character that does not care any codes what he has, so he just kills the opponent with no remorse, like a villain does. So is bloodlust just a depower in these fights to make them mindless numds or what. I mean there is many bloodlust fights out there? Just curious.

It's an "amped" Morals Off. He will try to kill Superman by any means, and as this is Quasar, he will not only drain his solar energy, but his life force too if bloodlusted, and that will not be a problem for him, it's his first move in every single fight and he drained beings and things that packed more energy than Superman will ever have, Ego for instance. That's why people should stop asking for him to be the next opponent of John Stewart.

So it's an "amped" Morals off? Do explain, because morals off is using your abilities without restraint to kill your opponent. If that was the meaning then I don't see a need to differentiate between morals off and bloodlust. And where has Quasar drained life force?

I'm stealing the definition from a fellow Viner:

@i_like_swords:

"Morals off is is in character, but not restricted by ones personal sense of morality. So Spider-Man will punch people as hard as he likes. Batman will pick up a gun and use it. You get the idea. However, the reason it differs from bloodlust is that while bloodlusted, you are trying all-out to kill someone by whatever means you can, completely unrelentless. So while bloodlusted you are out of character."

And for the life-force draining, I have those two instances, and I lost my issue where he drained the phoenix force, essentially, pure Life-Force, literally.

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2

Really? Those are the examples? Wow okay, lets begin then. Firstly concerning Jack of hearts, the energy he attacks with is also what he needs to survive, that's what he means by life force. Read the scan. The energy he attacks with is what Quasar drained from him, that same energy is vital to his metabolism. Without it he would die. That does not give Quasar the ability to outright drain life force from anyone. He can drain the energy they use and since that energy is vital for Jack, that's why he said life force. But that's only for Jack. Draining a GL's energy doesn't kill them, draining Superman's solar energy doesn't kill him, because it is not directly connected to their life like Jack's energy is. Everyone else he has ever drained is the same. Jack was the only one whose life was in danger because that energy is what keeps him alive. He drained his energy, the Zero energy, which is basically his fuel.

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2Gallery image 3
"Whatever energy he wields is so vital to his metabolism, I can't tap it without killing him."

Secondly, the only reason he was able to absorb Ego was because of the machine Richards, Stark and Banner made. The machine used the original process, that was used to compress and imprison Ego in the first place. They used the machine to leach Ego from the earth and PROJECT him into a host, not have the host casually absorb him as your claims suggest. The host was simply a containment unit for Ego's essence. He didn't have to absorb anything. Surfer couldn't contain the energy. He tried to store him inside his body and failed, yet Quasar managed it. Why is that you ask? It's simple really, Quasar is connected directly to the Quantum zone, which is as big as a universe. Lots of room for Ego.

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2Gallery image 3Gallery image 4

And lastly concerning Rachel. He didn't drain the Phoenix Force, he created a funnel to siphon the energy she was attacking with and redirect it at Modred. I really don't know where you got him draining the Phoenix Force from.

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2
A big funnel.

The way people use these scans out of context is amazing.