LP

Wow, that's really impressive! I wish I had money.

@yumyumbubblegum: Lol then why you love him so much if he's a bad artist?

@Joygirl said:

I have a crippling fear of spiders and there's nothing Spidey does that reminds me of them. He's more like a superpowered ninja in a goofy costume who whines a lot.

@yumyumbubblegum: I'd hate to interrupt you there, but this thread is only about artists you LIKE. There's plenty of flame threads elsewhere.

@ragdollpurps said:

Adam Hughes doesn't give his women wide enough hips. With how large their breasts are, they look top heavy without the hips to match.

I've been thinking that for years now. I mean, he's never even imagined what that would look like before? Seriously?

With all these legends gone, I can only hope that my generation and the next have new legends to fill the massive voids left.

By the same token, sexy is not exploitative, and exploitation is dishonest. Reverse that chain and you can see that, whoever you are writing, if you are honest about them, fair to them, and allow them their moments of brilliance, you can create that sexiness without it becoming pandering. Sexy is not a visual trait - that's titillation. Cheesecake, beefcake, those are entirely visual matters. What makes someone sexy - what makes anyone sexy, in my opinion - is less how they look than how they do. Competence is sexy. Capability is sexy. Confidence is sexy. Smart is sexy. A character who clearly embodies these traits in some capacity or another is a character who is going to be attractive.

Bending over to pick up a dropped pen with your ass high in the air isn't sexy, that's just a butt shot. We confuse arousing with sexy in the same way we confuse strength with cruelty. A strong character isn't, by definition, a mean one, but the confusion between the two has lead to a shorthand where the attempt to depict a female character as "strong" translates to "bitch." They're not the same. Strength is part of character, as well - those characters who know what they want, know what they're willing to do to achieve those goals, and who rise again and again against opposition are, by definition, strong.

Greg, I love you.

@saoakden said:

Well for if was me having powers, I rather have it be kept a secret from the public. For a few reasons:

1. Obiviously, cause my eneimes would take the easy, and yet, cowardly way & take my friends & family hostage.
2. Certain companies would want to use me as a mascot or spokesperson for one of their products.
3. I don't know if anyone watched Smallville when it was on but in Season 8 episode 15 called Infamous, Clark was being blackmailed by some crazy reporter so he decided to tell Lois & have his story published. But aftwerwards, everyone started taking advantage of his abilities by begging for an autograph, jumping off buildings so he can save him, & they easily made him from the hero to the villain in an instance after a story talking negativily about him was published.

So, I rather have my privacy if I was a superhero & maybe only let a few people know my secret.

Hey that's one of my favorite episodes of Smallville! Anyway, as for me I'm just not sure. I can see the benefits of having a secret and not having one, neither would be "easier" just different. I would love to think that everyone would love me but as long as there are people like Lex Luthor (yes there ARE people like him everywhere) and Jameson, I can't imagine them just "leaving me alone" because to them I'm just another celebrity = another target.

@Decoy Elite said:

@scifi_superstar said:

I hope supes goes over to the marvel universe soon and kicks the xmens ass also. Whats up, you dont like what i said? Come on pony! Come on and make something of it! Yeah thats what i thought pony. I will kick your ads like supes kicked captain americas and thors! Pony!

:D

WIN

#34 = DAMN. 0_0