kyrees

please point to me these creatures that live outside our planet because aside from a few microbes, there is nothing legitimately big enough for us to study. If you are talking about the UFO aliens cryptozoolgy describes, then it’s barely passable because of how nobody can meet them second time around for them to be studied accordingly.

No general reason? You are telling a story, you need to elucidate the details to readers so why are you trying to fry your mind on the lovelife of the dunwich horror(lovecraft) when your forte are genetic dinosaurs(crichton). I mentioned two authors that are expert to those two characters mentioned. Are you suggesting that the two authors step put of their comfort zones then? Honestly, i only came to this discussion because someone is telling seasoned authors who have created a lot of epic tales of subjects they know by heart to ignore those origins and tells other stories that they are not comfortable with.

i will admit that district 9 is a brand new story but the character design isn’t something new.

we are living in earth and have not met any alien that science has legitimately studied. your realism gripe is your fanciful way of thinking of what aliens should be and that is not even valid at all since because there is no standard for that at all. Lose the sci fi vibe?! We don’t even know what the nearest living alien looks like. who are you to say that when you haven’t even legitimately met an alien. If you are going to say one can imagine, then we go back to that point where people are more comfortable on what they know intimately. stepping out of that “comfort zone” is even more harder because there is no legitimate first step to it.

i mentioned cats and acorn worms since these are creatures we humans have intimate knowledge of. key point there is intimate knowledge. You seem to gloss that over. district 9 did a good job?! By what standard is that? Those bugs are still reminiscent of clicking bugs and cockroaches of earth.

Or a lot of authors are more comfortable on telling a story in hue of characters they know best. it feels cheap to you because you are ignoring those “comfort“ zones and a lot of author’s imagination and creativity thrive on that. what would you do if you are asked to write stories about an acorn worm when your main forte are cats?

Anyone with good regeneration can survive it though i would postulate an argument that extreme chakra usage might hamper that regeneration.

I would assume the time stone only showed possible solutions within that universe, with the book of vishanti outside that requirement given that it is trchnically outside said universe

i’m a get peeved but i don’t watch disney stuff anymore

And the first thing i see after being absent in comicvine for years is the omnipotence argument hehe

it’s a very exhausive argument which requires at least to ignore logic at some point however in relation to what universe uses it, it becomes a nuanced discussion. I mean marvel has levels of omnipotence, dc kills its omnipotence clause every few years and other universes generally simply opts to one above everyone argument. i will only argue within their universes definition of omnipotence though

then judge the people who can't restrain themselves, help the ones that want to be cured and ignore the ones that remain unknown. that's the perfect reaction to this because thought policing is a dangerous slope that can trigger a lot more than the intended cause. heck, i might as well assume orwellian levels of control by the government in a worst case scenario of dealing harshly to what amounts to future crime

why are you so focused on killing people who will not be physically, emotionally and psychologically dangerous to anyone regardless of terrible urges they have ? paedophilia isn't exactly the only dangerous urge out there.

i might as well say you're inherently wicked for thinking of killing people

frost was a missed opportunity