Jotham

Superman games are notorious for being awful, but there might be an older one that's okay. 
 
Edit: According to Wikipedia, Superman: Shadow of Apokolips received "average to positive reviews."

Interesting discussion, personally I base my comic decisions on the creator. I will buy pretty much anything by Grant Morrison, and to a lesser extent Warren Ellis. 
On another note, that's a very strange headshot of Brian Michael Bendis.

@jobiwankenobi said:

Second: They never explained how the spider gave Peter his powers or what the room full of spiders was for. Could any of those spiders have given him his powers?

Sixth: How did Peter get a hold of his web-shooters, a large amount of his webbing, and his costume?

The room full of spiders seemed to be so they could collect their webs and make that special web fluid stuff. As far as I remember, Peter just bought that stuff from them to use for his web shooters.

Namor and Black Adam look way too freaking similar. They aren't that different personality-wise, either.

I think Watchmen was better stylistically, but I enjoyed Avengers more.

@xxYoungFatexx: Interesting, thanks for the info.

Depending on circumstances, I could see him beating Cap.

@xxYoungFatexx said:

In addition, the way Manga is drawn allows them to easily take the pictures and animate them far easier than comic book art.

Really? I've never heard that, how do they do it?

@Xtremesteve said:

Soo... am I the only one that noticed that the comic has Baghdad misspelled?

I'm pretty sure G-Man noticed, considering he put "ancient Bagdad" in sarcastic quotes.

I'm surprised Grant Morrison didn't put that rug in the background of one of his issues.