@johnfrank120: Thank you so much for the kind words friend, much appreciated. Hehe the kindness you have shown me here though shall not stop me from calling you a soulless monstrosity the next time we meet hehehhe :p
Just because your taste sucks...
Anyway I'm not going to be on much anyway, so you will have to wait a long time.
1, @nickzambuto/@nickzambutoliesoutofhisass/@nickzambutoisanidiot: Always full of knowledge and provides interesting and fun debates. A bit long winded, but the read is always interesting. Takes at least 5 years to finish his debates, but that is around the same time it takes to read them so it isn't that bad. Constantly a guy who isn't afraid to challenge general consensus and express his view, even if he seems a bit stubborn at times. Overall a debater that produces consistently quality debates and is never one to shy away from challenge.
2, @highaccuser: Can debate in virtually any subject, and always brings his best. He makes sensible arguments, that are loaded with evidence. He is a well rounded debater that has interesting knowledge of all characters across the board and can often see flaws in arguments that others cannot. Overall a great debater that produces very interesting debates.
3, @juiceboks: A quality debater who can apply his knowledge quickly but very effectively. Uses scans well and doesn't just dump info like many other debates, but efficiently tears through and analyses and argument he faces. He provides convincing and great arguments and consistently debates against the best of the best and can do well every time. Overall a quality debater that is everywhere when it comes to tourneys.
4, @thenewbluebeetle007: A debater that has a furious and fast debate that troubles even the top of the top. Despite a very short time to prove himself, he has debated and beaten some of the best debaters with a debating style that is very hard to use well, but when it is is used to really test any debater. Overall a new user that has already made a huge impact on the vine debating scene.
5,@claymore1998: Oh god why. Anyway, she is a very knowledgeable debater, who can always keep a clear head and is always polite when bring her arguments. Someone who can assert her debating prowess without any hint of aggression or anything of the sort and debates in a very interesting fashion. Overall a nice debater, who has the knowledge and debating style to challenge virtually any debate. (Just finish like one debate).
Almost all the other people could of made the list, but I don't know all of the debates of many of the others, and recently I haven't had the time to read through either, but perhaps another year.
With my fourth and final year of uni and other things coming I'm going to be gone for quite a long time. I'll probably check PM groups every once in awhile, but otherwise I'm going to be off the vine. For my final post on the vine for aaaages I'm going to say: Go support Oxford United. Unless your team is a GB national team, English national team or a Chinese national team, your team is terrible.