J-man717's forum posts

Avatar image for j-man717
#1 Posted by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: Good for you, kid.

Well you've pretty much indirectly admitted to me being right. So I win. Of course, you will never admit to this, so dont take it as me expecting you to either.

Herp de derp.

"I'm always right, everyone is always wrong. I always win, everyone always loses." <-- You in a nutshell.

Someones mad cool

Uh, thanks?

L

M

L

M

L

Avatar image for j-man717
#2 Posted by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: Good for you, kid.

Well you've pretty much indirectly admitted to me being right. So I win. Of course, you will never admit to this, so dont take it as me expecting you to either.

Herp de derp.

"I'm always right, everyone is always wrong. I always win, everyone always loses." <-- You in a nutshell.

Someones mad cool

Uh, thanks?

L

M

L

Avatar image for j-man717
#3 Posted by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: Good for you, kid.

Well you've pretty much indirectly admitted to me being right. So I win. Of course, you will never admit to this, so dont take it as me expecting you to either.

Herp de derp.

"I'm always right, everyone is always wrong. I always win, everyone always loses." <-- You in a nutshell.

Someones mad cool

Uh, thanks?

L

Avatar image for j-man717
#4 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: Good for you, kid.

Well you've pretty much indirectly admitted to me being right. So I win. Of course, you will never admit to this, so dont take it as me expecting you to either.

Herp de derp.

"I'm always right, everyone is always wrong. I always win, everyone always loses." <-- You in a nutshell.

Someones mad

Avatar image for j-man717
#5 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: Good for you, kid.

Well you've pretty much indirectly admitted to me being right. So I win. Of course, you will never admit to this, so dont take it as me expecting you to either.

Avatar image for j-man717
#6 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@spareheadone: Nope, he's not. Here's my proof...

Go outside, stand in the street. Then, raise your hands up and say, "God, if you're real, strike me dead right this second." When it doesn't happen, that'll prove God doesn't exist.

...Anndd here it is. The stage of desperation.

It's called humor. Get over yourself.

Wow. How was I supposed to know you were joking? Besides, no offense, but you must have a terrible sense of humor if you consider that to be funny.

Avatar image for j-man717
#7 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@spareheadone: Nope, he's not. Here's my proof...

Go outside, stand in the street. Then, raise your hands up and say, "God, if you're real, strike me dead right this second." When it doesn't happen, that'll prove God doesn't exist.

...Anndd here it is. The stage of desperation.

Avatar image for j-man717
#8 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:
@j-man717 said:
@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: What do you consider "actual proof?"

Lol I literally specified it in my last comment

I must not have seen that before you edited your comment. Specifying in your last comment what you want out of your demand, is not the same as specifying what "actual proof" is to you. So, again, what do you consider "actual proof?" For example: you could say "a certified professor physically showing everyone on video and voice proof for a claim he made," or, "a piece of paper that has words on it, written by Jesus."

Well, its pretty obvious what actual proof would be. But of course, you are playing dumb and acting like you dont already know this.

Which begs the question, are you a troll, or just really dense?

I'm sure I don't have to remind you to refrain from insulting people or your posts will be flagged, right? Grow up. My question was genuinely sincere and simple as I was curious on what you desire as "actual proof."

Well I might insult you eventually, and probably will, but nowhere in my last comment did I actually insult you, just so you know.

Anyways you are still yet to prove that you didnt already know what "actual proof"would be. Unless you can at least do that (which I strongly doubt you will), I'll be done with you.

...what?

I must not have seen that before you edited your comment.

That's actually telling you that I did not see your edited comment, therefore, what "proof" you specified for your request. However, that doesn't answer my initial question, since it doesn't relate to your requested post.

I have to prove to you that I didn't know what YOU meant as actual proof. That is hilarious. Failed logic.

-You INDIRECTLY claimed that you didnt know what "actual proof" of God being present or not being present in any evolution branch/theory would be.

Even though its stupidly obvious what "actual proof"is of that, and you have displayed a level of intelligience where you must just be playing dumb now.

Unless you somehow actually lack the intelligience I speak of, and have somehow misinterpreted my request for you to provide any actual "proof for" it.

False. Just because you want it to be something it isn't, doesn't make it so. Learn what "context" means.

Insulting again, after a mod told you not to? Neat. Flagged.

Well to no ones surprise, you havent proven anything once again. Seriously starting to think your a troll lol.

Pot meet kettle.

Here's a reminder of what SC typed to you...

given you have a few alt accounts linked to your accounts with bans and warnings

...ah, okay. So, you have that kind of history. =)

Lol. That literally means nothing. But ok.

Avatar image for j-man717
#9 Edited by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:
@j-man717 said:
@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717 said:

@jexsu said:

@j-man717: What do you consider "actual proof?"

Lol I literally specified it in my last comment

I must not have seen that before you edited your comment. Specifying in your last comment what you want out of your demand, is not the same as specifying what "actual proof" is to you. So, again, what do you consider "actual proof?" For example: you could say "a certified professor physically showing everyone on video and voice proof for a claim he made," or, "a piece of paper that has words on it, written by Jesus."

Well, its pretty obvious what actual proof would be. But of course, you are playing dumb and acting like you dont already know this.

Which begs the question, are you a troll, or just really dense?

I'm sure I don't have to remind you to refrain from insulting people or your posts will be flagged, right? Grow up. My question was genuinely sincere and simple as I was curious on what you desire as "actual proof."

Well I might insult you eventually, and probably will, but nowhere in my last comment did I actually insult you, just so you know.

Anyways you are still yet to prove that you didnt already know what "actual proof"would be. Unless you can at least do that (which I strongly doubt you will), I'll be done with you.

...what?

I must not have seen that before you edited your comment.

That's actually telling you that I did not see your edited comment, therefore, what "proof" you specified for your request. However, that doesn't answer my initial question, since it doesn't relate to your requested post.

I have to prove to you that I didn't know what YOU meant as actual proof. That is hilarious. Failed logic.

-You INDIRECTLY claimed that you didnt know what "actual proof" of God being present or not being present in any evolution branch/theory would be.

Even though its stupidly obvious what "actual proof"is of that, and you have displayed a level of intelligience where you must just be playing dumb now.

Unless you somehow actually lack the intelligience I speak of, and have somehow misinterpreted my request for you to provide any actual "proof for" it.

False. Just because you want it to be something it isn't, doesn't make it so. Learn what "context" means.

Insulting again, after a mod told you not to? Neat. Flagged.

Well to no ones surprise, you havent proven anything once again. Seriously starting to think your a troll lol.

Avatar image for j-man717
#10 Posted by J-man717 (119 posts) - - Show Bio

@sc said:

@j-man717: I can sympathize with that. Just try and remember, its always okay to agree to disagree with other users.

I had a really interesting and cool conversation with you, even though we disagreed, you were polite and cordial too. If you treat other users that way, they will usually notice and start to treat you similar. If you feel frustrated by a user, might also mean they feel frustrated by you as well, leads to tense disagreements, so might be good if one of you tries to defuse the tension and make it a bit more chill. Religion is an important topic, close to many of us, but is still important to remember to be kind and patient to others.

Hope you have a good day! Take care!

Thanks. You too