GermanX

So it seems that you have no concept of how real life is like? A big project whose relevancy requires the involvement of the government as a stakeholder will logically mean that Trump needs approval from the government to do it the right way. Or are you just willfully attacking Trump just because you don't like him?

How non-human animal predators be encouraged to go vegan

To help encourage discussion on this, I have put up 3 rough, vague ideas how this can be done:

Adapting by force

Let non-human animal predator in captivity starve for a couple days - Do NOT serve any food, not even vegetables

When you think the predator becomes desperate enough, put in a plate of vegetables and it should be hungry enough to start eating the vegetables.

For feasibility, this practice can start with, say 80% meat and 20% vegetables before slowly weaning the predator off the meat by cutting the meat down by 5% for each subsequent meal.

Adapting by advanced technology

There has been science breakthrough that it is becoming possible to make actual meat (Not the fake vegetarian meat we see on the markets) without killing animals. Still expensive, but a meat patty's been made, and hopefully the process will one day be streamlined and the technology for making meat become cheaper.

Adapting by deception

Instead of serving real meat, we can serve fake vegetarian meat that is designed to look and taste like meat. The animal will likely not be able to differentiate between the two - I know for sure because I have tried both vegetarian meat and real meat and both seem to taste the same.

@gracetrack: @jmarshmallow: erm, you are arguing for Batman and Reed Richards to be equal in terms of capability which is arguably possible but is not seen yet. Which is why we have feats. Batman's prep feats on overall still have yet to match Reed's prep feats on overall.

Potential capability argument is NOT the same as feats argument

Donald Trump is not Batman. He is rich but he is not as generous as Batman nor is he as rich as Batman.

@johnnyz256: no idea what the hell are you rambling about. Since when did science dictated that its impossible for humans to do a moon landing?

Who is Wenjun Chew? I keep hearing his name, I don't know his history.

Same old shtick? I have only been talking about Batman for the past few weeks after a hiatus from reading comics, and I don't constantly hang around the forums 24/7.

Your ad hominem proved that you had nothing of value to contribute to a discussion.

@pipxeroth said:

@germanx: Peak human has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with physicals.

Your logic is totally flawed anyway because peak human is not a static level, it's an extremely vague spectrum. Writers even acknowledge this.

It's like saying that Spider-Man can accomplish the same feats as Hulk because both are superhuman.

What? Peak human may often refers to physical, but it often can involve intelligence. Meaning, for a peak human it would be unrealistic (By contemporary fictional standards) to do something superhumanly intelligent. I don't see why you must separate intelligence from physicals among peak humans.

I agree the term "peak human" is a pretty broad spectrum, which is why we are here. You think it is unrealistic for Batman to destroy a universe, I don't think it is unrealistic, given that logically one doesn't need superhuman abilities to do something that can cause the destruction of a universe.