When did Dooku killed Savage's relative or someone important so Savage could be ''rage amped'' (it's still stupidest excuse ever for a darksider) against Dooku?
When Maul kills Qui-Gon, Kenobi's amplification could be comparable to only Luke's. Because Vader also killed Ben Kenobi in front of Luke, then Vader threatened Luke by using Leia later.
But fanboys are comparing those to Savage vs. Dooku, where Savage simply beats Dooku because he was just better. Not because Dooku killed someone important to Savage... :))
Then the same fanboys are making up excuses again when Dooku loses to Quinlan Vos, by saying Vos was amped, as if Dooku killed someone important to Vos before... :))
But hey, let's forget all of these, and just use Kenobi here because it suits their purpose right? Forget that special relationship between Maul - Qui-Gon and how Qui-Gon's death changed Kenobi's life entirely... :))
This is a universe where Rey with zero lightsaber training beats a fully trained Jedi Ben Solo just because she was amped due to losing Han Solo. Amplifications > fighting prowess in Star Wars.
An objective person would forget about that emotionally amped Obi-Wan v Maul, and uses fair fights such as Savage v Dooku / Vos v Dooku, and AEYNTK Top 5 list where Maul ranks better than Dooku, and Maul's superior performances against Mace Windu and Darth Sidious.