The only thing i have to say about the subject of evolution is this:

A human DNA molecule is completely different from the DNA molecule of another animal. The same goes for other animals. They are two completely different molecules no matter how similar they may be.

Differences within the human race come from the fact that each of us have certain genes emphasized or de-emphasized more than some others(during the process of protein synthesis)along with some genetic errors/deletions and misprints through our reproduction over the generations.

Its all about logic. To define something properly you must know what it is and what it is not. Part of knowing what something is is knowing what it isn't.

For example: 2 and 3 are not the same. Why? because 3 is one more than 2. The number two may be within the number 3, giving the numbers some commonality or similarity but that does not make them the same(the beauty of math is the commonality).

A hydrogen atom and helium atom have similarity with each other. A helium atom can be made by fusing two hydrogens. Does that make them the same atom? No!

All things have commonality whether it be numbers, atoms, or life forms. That does not make them all the same! The life forms of earth share the same planet so they are probably bound to have some commonality. "We are all made of atom, which make up molecules so we must be the same". Wrong!

I believe the study of biology, studying the function of all a life-forms parts and how it came to be is valuable but acting like humans are born from something inhuman is stupid. All things came from something that wasn't themselves, the infinite force and nonstop forces of the universe and the creator of it.

Evolution when looked at as some form of improvement or suggestion that humans are produced from inhuman life forms justified by referring to the commonality between the lifeforms is stupid, meaningless and a waste of everyone's brain.

And life-forms are not a special thing anyway. All lifeforms do is take in energy and release it which is the same as anything whether its has a mind to preserve self or not. Living and non-living things do the same thing but it seems the nature of creation is expressed through both and not just one.

The debate over what evolution is and what the term means in regards to biology is just proof of the corruption of truth and confusion that persists in certain subjects within the scientific community.

(P.S.): A person or a genetic mutation kicking you in the testes and thus stopping you from reproducing with your own kind does not mean you have become another species. In fact classifying species by reproduction is good but not entirely accurate. The best way is the see if the two lifeforms have the same type of DNA molecule.

Atoms make molecules, the DNA molecules make the more visible and larger structures from different combinations of other molecules in order to produce protein and fats which make up the large organs systems of the body. And all they really basically do is take in energy, energy being mass and motion, and use it up.

And of course, energy is neither created nor destroyed, only stored and transferred.

Why not debate chemistry? That's what it comes down to.

Humans and chimps are two different animals. Cased closed. Their chemistry is not the same.

The DNA is made of chemicals called genes and combinations of those genes are what decide the type of physical characteristics of an animal's organ systems. Molecules that build other molecules.

With the DNA's genes being made up of rows of combinations of adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine(all of which is lined with phosphate deoxyribose) , on more than one row, chimps have a molecular combination that is different than a human's.

The DNA molecule of humans is different than the DNA molecule of chimps. You wouldn't take two different types of alcohol molecules and say they are the same. Being very similar does not mean you are the same.

In a chemical reaction, two different chemicals reacting to the same thing will not take the same path of reaction.

Chimps are not gorillas, and Gorillas are not orangutans. They are all different, DNA-wise, and because of that their organ systems are built and function differently.

ALL THESE APES ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CREATURES. STOP EQUATING APPLES TO ORANGES.

And there is no super-powered gene that allows humans or other animals to morph their DNA molecule into another, gaining new genes. The only thing that makes humans different from each other is that some genes are used in greater or lesser amounts than others and gene deletions which is known as "mutations".

The basic molecular structures of the DNA being changed is something every life form resists and makes sure does not happen.

Gene deletions, also known as mutations, can have a neutral effect or they can have a negative effect. Genetic mutations happen since the DNA can not work right 100 percent of the time. They can occur randomly or be caused by some living and environmental conditions.

But what about mutations where genes are duplicated? What about when some of the nucleotides(the components of genes, known as Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine, and Thymine) are switched out with others?

Autism and Down syndrome don't come from mutation of all the DNA molecules. Because of the fact that some DNA is left unmutated is the reason why people are physically impaired in some way. There is a little more than 100 genes that are mutated and there are 3 billion genes in one DNA molecule. The extra chromosomes an autistic person has is due to the mutation of a few of their DNA molecules.

Autism, Down syndrome, sickle cell anemia, hemophilia, albinism and others are not evolution. Mutations that don't affect the chromosome number allows people to have children. The reason people with albinism can have children without it is because not all their DNA molecules are mutated.

Genetic damage is not evolution.

Mutations can not cause evolution.

Every DNA molecule in the body would have to change and they would all have to change the exact same way.

You have a better chance of winning the multi-million dollar lottery every single day for the rest of your life than that ever happening. A complete DNA molecule is made up of billions of nucleotides.

The only reason we can spot a mutation is because we can look at people's DNA groups(chromosomes) and tell that some DNA molecules are different than the others.

Mutations change your DNA molecules into other molecules. When these molecules are in close proximity to your other DNA molecules they become a bio-chemical weapon against your own body.

A complete change of all your DNA molecules to another molecule is the death of living thing. Mutation is genetic damage and the final result is death.

Rewriting a person's entire genome should not be considered a good thing; its just one of many ways to die.

What I'm saying is this: Humans do not add any new molecular combinations, known as genes, that make up the DNA. Humans merely change how they express their DNA and the DNA is getting weaker throughout the generations.

My Final Words:

The theory of evolution is not what allows scientist to understand biology but chemistry is. Chemistry is the key to biology.

The more you know about chemistry the more you know about biology. Biochemistry is the name of the game.

Since we are all molecules and molecules can form in multiple different ways, there did not have to exist an organism with all the DNA of earth's organisms combined that somehow got split apart, bit by bit. And the notion that human biology only reveals itself through genetic variation of human populations is stupid. Its all about chemistry in the end!

Science is about getting results not stupid theories that don't give you anything. Knowledge and the method by which you can acquire it so you can directly apply that knowledge. Science is about knowing how to use the world around you.

The theory of evolution is the dumbing down of biochemistry. Ultimately, science speaks in terms of chemistry and not stupid, unproven theories.

Evolution is not scientific discovery, its science fiction. It should not be taught in schools. Anything can be called a scientific study, but that does not mean it makes any sense and exists in the real world.

Not only that, but its has not contributed to any advancement in biochemistry, agriculture, medicine, etc.

DNA is made rows of specific nucleotide combinations. Adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine are the four nucleotides. The difference between life forms comes from the difference of nucleotides they possess on each row.

DNA molecules can be made of billions of nucleotides. How can random changes of any kind to a random DNA molecule, produce all the life-forms seen on earth? Its like saying that my Marvel vs Capcom fighting game can form after billions of years of random change to a random computer disk.

Computers disks are made of billions of binary code characters, ones and zeros, but I would never say a game of Marvel vs Capcom can randomly appear through random changes to a computer disk. Sadly, this is the sort of nonsense that evolution says about DNA.

There are millions of chemical reactions your body is doing every second and all goes towards making different structures work together and work well, all because of DNA molecules. The amount of chemical reactions the body does in a day could fill several books and would take up more than 500 gigabytes of data on a computer hard drive.

Let me know what you think. in your opinion, what do you think is the reason people debate over Evolution?