I hate to say this, but this post hits the nail in the head.
Prof X has been shown to be a overrated good-for-nothing character, with the hax to end most of the X-Men battles even before they start, that prefers to sit back and watch as his so called children risk their lives.
Loading Video...
This is the only time he tries to stop a fight, and he is too gutless to follow through and actually choke Magnus or be of any real use.
Instead, heaving the ability to stop them, he chooses to sit by and watch them take an innocent away.
Nerfing Adam but allowing his opponent to keep his full arsenal usually results in a loss for one side.
Nice Post, with all them gifs and videos. You must be very proud of yourself. It reminds me a Christmas tree, all fancy and glossy, jet useless in the end, because all of Magnus feats mean nothing if steel can't cut or stop BA.
Eventually he will close the space between them. And once he does he will give Eric a taste of the Sabbac treatment.
Imagine if MCU Prof Hulk got so angry that he would transform into a World War level savage Hulk, so powerful and so angry that all the Avengers have to unite to stand against him.
That doesn't sound bad at all. In the end, everybody want's to see Hulk smash.
@mahfire: Topic creator complains about Loki getting nerfed forgetting that variants vary in power levels and don't scale to one another.
Isn't this Loki straight out of the Avengers 1 Movie? All his feats from up to there are valid.
He is technically a variant but he's supposed to be the same up until 2012 where the Avengers go back in time to get the stones so he should still have superhuman strength
Comic Vine when a character can't split a planet open with a finger flick.
I understand where you are coming from, but Loki this particular case does not fall in line with unwarranted complaints. Loki was turned from having Superhuman Strength that dwarfed Captain America to struggling with regular humans. Add to the fact the writer did not even watch the films involving Loki then fans have all the right to complain
That's cool and all but I really don't care. Feats are meaningless to a story.
What are you talking about? So if Yoda all of a sudden can't use the force or James Bond suddenly can't shoot straight, it's meaningless to the story?
Get out of here XD
Those aren't feats, those are a power set. That's different. Saying "This character has x ability" is different from "This character is strong enough to beat x powerful being.
I'm saying it doesn't matter if a character is super strong or not. Yoda could lose to Darth Maul and I wouldn't care.
Doctor Strange was humiliated by Spider-Man in the recent movie and people don't seem to care.
Super Strength is a power set. Loki lost that power set
No he didn't. That guy who threw him around was enhanced lol, Loki is like 600 lbs. There's no way a normal human would be able to throw him around. Same goes for anyone who could fight him in the series. Not only that, he also tanked a hit from a weapon that would definitely kill any normal human.
That would certanly answer the OP question.
I haven't seen the full show jet, so I'll get back when I have, with a better formed opinion.
For the moment, in the fight with the guy futured in the OP I don't feel we saw any kind of enhanced characteristics to back your claim. I mean, a fat guy throwing a skinny guy around is something seen over an again in movies futuring non-powered people.
Loki was hitting the guy with a vacuum cleaner, for the love of God, a vacuum cleaner! No one crushed through any walls, no heavy items where lift, no blunt objects where trhown as to show any kind of enhanced resistance or strength.
This is the level of strength Loki has.
So from that fight alone... It does not seem any of the fighters where enhanced, at all.
Ok, that's it. I had it with this thread!
Look at the video again all of you:
Loading Video...
Neither of them has any superstrength. It's obvious.
Fat guy kicks Loki. Loki falls on his back. He doesn't fly a big distance, or crushes against a wall cracking it. Nothing. Just falls on his back and slides on the polished floor.
Same thing happens when fatguy throws Loki. He slides on the floor. No large distance flight.
Fat guy punchs a TV. He breaks the screen but the TV doesn't even fall over. Note it's a flat screen TV, not one of those old glass teles, one could argue is hard to break.
Loki blocks fatguy's blow with a robot vacuum cleaner. The appliance does not even crack.
Loki hits fatguy with vacuum cleaner. Vacuum cleaner does not break, even though it is swung by the plastic tube.
Then Loki falls through some cardboard boxes and is to tired to get up.
Are you seriously saying the feats on this fight suggest any of the fighters has strength superior to this?
Comic Vine when a character can't split a planet open with a finger flick.
I understand where you are coming from, but Loki this particular case does not fall in line with unwarranted complaints. Loki was turned from having Superhuman Strength that dwarfed Captain America to struggling with regular humans. Add to the fact the writer did not even watch the films involving Loki then fans have all the right to complain
That's cool and all but I really don't care. Feats are meaningless to a story.
What are you talking about? So if Yoda all of a sudden can't use the force or James Bond suddenly can't shoot straight, it's meaningless to the story?
Before anyone says Thor wins via lightning cloak. Check out Absorbing man's putting enough electricity through Banner to black out a full city. Hulk isn't even faded.
Bana's Hulk is above Ruffalo's Hulk in every possible way.
If I'm not mistaken that feat is roughly comparable to a small nuke, like the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I definitely don't think that's above Thor's capabilities by IW/Ragnarok.
I see what you did there. By using the adjective "small" before nuke, you trivialize the feat.
Just like my ex trivialized the uncanny shapeshifting abilities of my d*ck. Well done.
Nonetheless that's Hulk surviving a head on nuclear blast, right there.
Also showing Hulk to be inmune to lighting strikes.
What other stuff can Thor dish out? Blunt damage I would say...
And seen how him and Ruffalos' Hulk are sort of equals on the blunt department, I don't find it outrageous that Bruce Bana could fair better than his more recent interpretation.
Log in to comment