@fitnesstribesman13: Wow so edgy.
chingchangwalla's forum posts
@cor_tsar:I didn't mean to offend...
Of course, everyone is different but the Universal Standards of Beauty (Facial symmetry, straight teeth etc.) are traits found more in whites and Asians than Blacks. Of course you can argue this isn't all genetic and that may very well be the case, but it doesn't mean it isn't 'race specific'.
For example, 45.8 percent of black children under age 6 live in poverty, compared to 14.5 percent of white children. This would mean that they generally have less access to proper dental care and little actual nutrient-rich food. Not to mention the correlation between poverty and drug & alcohol abuse + blacks' high susception to death after being diagnosed with disease.
All this contributes to health and therefore, appearance. Whether it be obesity, (75 percent of African Americans are overweight or obese compared with 67.2 percent of Whites) lack of dental (the higher chance of poverty means black children would have next to no access to braces or other teeth straightening devices, and compared with non-Hispanic whites, other racial and ethnic groups were less likely to receive annual dental examinations) I could really go on and on.
Here we see Asian women and White men the most favourable, and Black men and Women as the least favourable by a significant margin.
Even the Huffington Post, a notorious left-wing 'news' site admitted that the classic signs of beauty were: “High cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion.”
Observing a group of non-white men and women and examining the features inherent to their race, it's not hard to figure out that most of the 'universal beauty' traits just aren't found. The results for the most attractive men and women: lips are full, but not too full; they have a narrow nose, as well as a smaller forehead with large eyes and a pale complexion which equates to beauty and good health.
To summarise a little; The correlation between blacks and poverty, the correlation between poverty and substance abuse, limited access to healthy food, dental care and the toll this has on their appearance. The genetics are against them, with most blacks not fitting into the "Universal Standards of Beauty" specifications.
A black kid in a suburban area populated with whites, usually ends up acting like a white suburban kid. It's not the race that makes these statistics, It's setting, education, etc. There are suburban areas populated by black doctors and lawyers, etc.
So again, it doesn't have to be genetic to be race specific. Black Americans score about 15 points less than White Americans on cognitive ability or IQ, it's an undeniable fact. For sure, studies have shown that black kids with white adopted parents aren't far off their white counterparts in regards to intelligence but would you seriously suggest that black parents should be stripped of their children because they aren't smart enough? I mean interracial couples cause enough problems with the child (See this article: "Science says your baby is a little Racist") as it sees the father/mother of a different race as alien or foreign. It can't relate with something so different to them. Hence why I'm opposed to interracial couples.
To address the doctor comment unless you have a stat regarding black doctors in the Suburbs, I have to disagree. Despite Colleges specifically looking to find blacks, begging even, ("This teen wrote #BlackLivesMatter over and over on his Stanford application — and got in") not nearly enough are actually enrolling: Even With Affirmative Action, Blacks and Hispanics Are More Underrepresented at Top Colleges Than 35 Years Ago
2015 Distribution of Medical School Graduates by Race
They are against GodEmperorPutin. They are the enemy.
Log in to comment