acer51

This user has not updated recently.

2695 0 24 37
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

acer51's forum posts

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By acer51

The Silver Surfer.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bobbi

Agent Carter

Absorbing Man

Battrock the Leaper.

Gartman Saal

Patrick Oswald LMD

Rouge Ultra bot.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Generalization of people. He literally called all illegal immigrant Mexicans drug dealers and rapists. I, having gone through being an illegal immigrant Mexican, have to say that he is a complete xenophobic asshole.

I admire his attempt in making things better. But if he want to do things right, he has to opens his eyes right.

This is inaccurate and based on Media spinning of the truth.

He said that some illegal immigrants are criminals and rapists, he wasn't referring to all Mexicans, all Immigrants, or all illegal immigrants.

That being said you are correct his immigration plan is far too harsh, I for one am in favor of granting citizenship to all Mexican immigrants currently north of the border who haven't been involved in illegal activities (aside from crossing the border, and obviously a large measure of mercy is to be provided for those who did things such as steal food for starving family)

What we need to do is grant amnesty to those people, allow them to come and registration for citizenship, anyone who refuses to register after that, we could say have a three month period where they do this and if they don't register than they get deported.

After that I'm 100% in favor of having well defended southern border and totally on board with having a wall, it is dangerous to have people coming into the country without going through any kind of screening, and obviously Democrats would fight for looser regulations and Republicans for more stringent ones, and less people might come in but more would come in legally than before and it's just better that way.

What Donald Trump wants to do is deport all current illegal immigrants and then allow them to come back legally through the wall.

A careful reading of his immigration policy tells us "Applicants for entry to the United States should be required to certify that they can pay for their own housing, healthcare and other needs before coming to the U.S."

This information is actually more important to me, and in my opinion more damaging to Donald Trumps case than deporting illegals for it allows a decoding of what he's said in public, it means that the "good ones" are the ones who can afford their basic needs, which in my opinion is overly harsh and entirely uncharitable.

So logically after analyzing what Trump has actually said as opposed to what the media has pretended he said I have come to the following conclusions.

If Donald Trump is elected....

1) Millions of Mexicans will be deported

2) The ones who need to be here the most won't come back.

...........................................................................................

I'd like you to acknowledge this is not a denouncement of Donald Trump, but a logical analyses of his policies which he has not lied about and indeed published publicly in a simple, well written, and easy to read format, Donald Trump's policies are the best written and stated I've ever seen, just reading the writing leads me to admire his honesty.

You and others usually base your criticisms on false media claims and outright lies.

As a voter I feel it is my responsibility to be informed on the issues and make the judgment that is best for the American people, each individual is in effect their own delegate able to choose who they send to represent them, I demand someone worthy.

So after having but forward what I believe to be my best criticism of Donald Trump I can honestly say he is the best option, while Donald Trump's policy in this singular matter is harsh his other policies are extremely benevolent towards the poor, the middle class, the disenfranchised.

Under Donald Trump the income tax would be eliminated for most and reduced for all, after careful study of his tax plan I have come this conclusion of his motives.

Donald Trump genuinely believes it is his duty to serve the American people, his behavior suggeststhis and I honestly believe he will do everything in his ability to serve and protect that group alone. His policies reflect that, which is why after careful examination his policies are favorable to every group, every tax bracket, every ethnicity, except for illegal immigrants.

This is the truth, but in my opinion although he is without a doubt the best presidential candidate (for there is no other candidate whose primary motivation is the well being of this nation) his policies towards illegal immigrants is too harsh.

If I was one for electing the "best option" or the "lesser of evils" I would without a doubt vote for Trump.

As of yet I remain undecided.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I like Donald Trump, I support him, I may vote for him.

If he was more mature but no less honest and clear towards his views and opposition to the establishment I think he'd increase by another 30%.

But at this point simply being honest is enough to win a majority. What does that tell you when the public is so sick of lying politicians that their willing to elect someone solely on the basis of integrity and policy, in spite of the mans coarse attitude?

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By acer51

@acer51: the fight was more than a single arrow. Ray was inexperienced and the suit was still fairly new (he didn't even have his shrinking yet) and he was still beating Oliver and Roy's asses because they brought arrows to a ironman-esque super weapon fight. Ray only lost because oliver spotted a weakspot in the armor. The suit has gotten a few upgrades since then.

@buildhare said:

@lemonpeace:

He doesn't have to be because Antman is nowhere near Ironman tier.

Wasn't implying that, it was directed at people comparing him Iron man.

I'm not seeing how a shrinking disc would equal Ray losing.

The tech wasn't perfected, it turns organics to mush.

Ray is cover head to toe in a tech suit. unless Scott is pulling a hawkeye and landing a disc in the small mouth opening on Rays suit, those disc are bouncing right off.

Also how does he shrink "better"?

For the reasons you stated. He goes between sizes faster and can go smaller then Ray (by a lot)

if you are talking about going subatomic, he's shown to sign of being able to easily transition in and out of that PLUS when he did do it, he almost died so again, non-factor.

how would that help against an opponent that can also shrink?

Being able to do the same thing as Ray but faster and more efficiently obviously gives him an advantage.

The process of shrinking is about the same speed the only difference is that Scott transitions small to big to small to big more frequently suggesting he can transition in rapid succession faster. However, this is only suggested considering we don't see Ray do that because he's a walking weapon and doesn't need the same tactics as Scott; nor is it stated be can't do the same. Even at that, it doesn't matter simple because why would either of them be constantly changing their size after they realize the other can shrink? answer: they won't because it would be pointless. non-factor.

Morals on or off Scott doesn't have anything that can put Ray down

Morals off he stomps. I'm not sure there is much to debate on that. He has a weapon that will instantly kill Ray and the capacity to go much much smaller then he can and destroy him and the suit from the inside. I've already discussed what happens morals on, read my previous post.

already addressed the weapon.

Ants can't breach his suit so they're a non-factor

Again, Ray isn't Iron man. He literally has a gap for his mouth/ jaw, parts of his suit were falling of in the last episode, they can breach his suit.

Ray's suit "falling apart" is a bit of a reach because pieces of his suit only even fail or fall off when it's plot convenient. He survives a missile to the chest and flying through a fighter jet but a piece falls off in a scuffle with some fodder? Generally his suit can endure bullets, arrows and explosions so yeah he can survive some ants. Unless Ray is laying perfectly still on the floor I doubt any ant is going to be able to get at the opening at his mouth/jaw.

Scott's pym discs can't do much because Ray can either blast them out the air

When has he done anything to suggest he's capable of that?

He has a targeting system built into his suit, I doubt he couldn't track and shoot some frisbees Pym disc. However, i'll give you that one, maybe he can't shoot a moving target (I don't think he's done that on the shows) but as I mentioned before it wouldn't be an issue for him to just fly out of the way or deflect them.

The Atom's suit is just too much for Scott

I could argue the sky is purple, because sometimes it is and color is considered by some to be perception.

Atom's feats are weak while Ant Man has defeated WAY more powerful combatants.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Grand Inquisitor is toast, he was defeated by Kanan, who is an apprentice who had just started his training and took a few levels in Smuggler.

This is basically Asaji vs Dooku, in which case Dooku wins after a moderate fight.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By acer51

Who cares what people are saying? From what I've seen although people are experimenting with female superhero's there have been no big hits so yea, there's totally a lot of room for more female superheros.

So far we have.

Supergirl (sucks)

Jessica Jones (meh)

Agent Carter (meh)

These are the only ones who have had their own series, Black Widow and Jennifer Lawrence's Mystique are more prominent than any of the independents even as supporting characters no ones had a movie since Electra and we all know how that turned out.

So yea if Wonder Woman is even "good" or "just ok" it will be pretty much the best female solo film/show ever made.

I have hope for Wonder Woman and all of the DCCU in general, we'll see how BvS does introducing her.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sc said:

@leo-343 said:

@turoksonofstone said:

people ARE animals.

Except for obvious differences like intelligence, morality, rationality...the fact that we rule the world.

Intelligence, morality and rationality aren't factors in deciding whether humans are classified as animals or not. Rather its to do with how we reproduce, digest, consume and expend energy, some other things. So if you mean to imply that humans are the most intelligent and rational animals, sure, or alternatively if you are aware of the various definitions and applications of the term animal, and are choosing to use the more 'colloquial' and 'informal' definition that some people use, thats fine too, just that the other user is probably using the more objective scientific definition.

Wow I was going to bring up the colloquial definition if you hadn't added that, you really have your bases covered there.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If they are than most of us are effectively cannibals.

I don't think they are.

Avatar image for bluetoothbully
acer51

2695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

37

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lemonpeace: Atom got taken out by a single arrow, Ant-man takes this.