BillyBobYamma

@krisbishop: SHIELD was literarly watching the whole time, and if there were trouble all the othr avengers would have appeared. the only reason they didn't is cause this is a spider-man movie

@krisbishop: The difference is that Maguire is on his own. Holland has all of SHIELD and Avengers so he never has to do anything himself

@wesat said:Varies from character to character, for exampleNew Thor is betterOld Spider-Man was betterNew Thor Better than Simmonsons?

I liked the older Spider-Man from the 60s with Lee/Romita/Ditko a million times more htan Spencer/Ottley

@draciosv: Here is a list of Shonen jump sales https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekly_Sh%C5%8Dnen_Jump at the bottom. From 84-95 there was a huge spike. That's Dragon Ball I think doing that. after tha...

The main reasons Superhero comics were anything at all before was there were no alternatives. once the 80s and 90s came around you started getting Video games and the internet and all that. then more...

I hated the MCU spider-man just a spoiled kid who has everything handed to him and has no real problems but still finds the time to complain

It was never good to begin with, it was successful based on it's premise alone

This is the plain and simple reason why DBZ (And most manga) is inconsistent. Because they have to draw everything themselves week after week wtih barely any break,and I think bringing out product is...

I don't know this guy,my dead mentor gave me these glasses,they are my last memory of him aside from the space suit. I would be a moron to hand htem over