Aimless

@decaf_wizard:

>thinks its ok to attack people on the street for no reason other than political views

If said political views are detrimental to human values and call for expulsion of humans based on their race,then yes it's okay to attack those who spread them,in fact it's needed.

Though by your logic it's completely fine if someone starts a pro-ISIS rally,since after all you want to safeguard all political views.

>calls the victims nazi's

I never once stated this,the victims were the ones who got run over by a neo nazi/supremacist/whatever you wish to call him.

Call it what you like, the Alt Right doesn't actively attack people on the street.

Totally,the man that killed a 32 year old woman during the protest was a vegan communist.Not sure if you're even serious at this point when there are so many examples of Alt Right attacking individuals,shooting mosques and burning abortion clinics.

Every altercation they have on the streets has been instigated by ANTIFA, who feel it is correct to beat people up for their supposed beliefs. The irony of this is lost on them, and you it seems.

I'm going to make it a point when I say I don't support ANTIFA's views,but I do support them when they oppose a hateful group.Just the same way I'd support Trump opposing a radical terrorist,even if I totally disagree with his general views.

Freedom of speech is good and all,but that doesn't mean freedom of consequences.If you want to spread an evil idea in public you'd better be ready to have people oppose you.

I condemn the group which preaches nonsense such as killing people based on their race etc.I support the group that fights such groups,it's that simple.I support violence against a group that commits violence itself.

The alt-right are literal Nazi fascists,they aren't human beings anymore if they practice their agenda in any way whatsoever.So yeah,I support Antifa attacking Nazi scums,it's what every decent human being would instead of crying "iTz fReDOoM aUf sPEEchZ".To my knowledge,only one group attacks people based on their race.I guess we should be okay with holding rallies for ISIS supporters too right?

And BLM and SJWs aren't even inherently violent groups.Sure there are violent racists in BLM,some of them even senior members,but they have never had a history associated with slaughtering non blacks like the KKK,nor is it their core belief.

I cried a little...

Depends how seriously you take her stomping Goku,

Though I must say that re-shaping a large super dense tournament ring with just screams is impressive,wish we could quantify that.

Every arc in DBZ had a big moment but none shaped the franchise and shounen anime the way the first super saiyan transformation did

Mismatch,Kratos has stopped Cronos' hand from squashing him,what chance does sttgl have?

He created his own fighting style while fighting Jackie Chun,apart from that all his techniques are derived from other techniques or are just flat out other peoples' techniques

I think it wouldn't be that bad if those were the power levels they were introduced with.It's not like Goku and co. got as strong as they are now in a few days.I wouldn't have a problem with U6 saiyans being as strong as even Hit,if they were that strong to begin with.Nobody is complaining about the power levels of Toppo or Jiren because they were always that strong.

The fact that a character can become so powerful in such a short time is lazy plot driven writing,and it's been done to death so much in DBS that it's no longer special

Also if you want a more consistent interpretation of power levels in DBS,I'd say read the manga.

Besides,I've seen worse sins in DBS than Kale wrecking SSB Goku,who has fought evenly with opponents ranging from Krillin to Hit levels

She's a woman