Makes Disney and Feige look weak imo. GotG2 was semi garbage imo so didn't really care whether or not they made a third one with or without Gunn. I think this is a bad look for them though.
I could see that take.
I could also see the viewpoint that it makes Disney look like a company that knows how to make money, and be manipulative in the best sense of the term under capitalism. The people who were and could of been unhappy about Gunn as a controversy back when have probably moved on, there isn't as much heat, emotion, hot headedness around the issues. Gunn was super apologetic. Now Marvel/Disney looks like they are giving him a second chance "they are willing to forgive" and there is also new context... Gunn got work at other movie studios. Marvel can deflect any new criticism off on to other studios on top of them also giving him a second chance, we believe in redemption yadda yadda. Would also explain why they didn't hire a new director. This might not actually be the case, and is all speculation... but
There are a lot of people who are just apathetic to such situations. Don't really care one way or another, so Disney has to consider above two viewpoints with the viewpoint a lot of people don't care or think about how this reflects on Disney and... thats probably the majority.
Personally I wouldn't be surprised if someone at Disney/Marvel informally off the record told Gunn, Disney just needs to create distance, in a few months, everything will blow over, social media will move on, we'll get you back on Guardians and put a nice positive spin on everything for the media. I also wouldn't be surprised if any other number of scenarios were the actual case too mind you.
Log in to comment