@SupBatz said:
Jason is a character who has been quite literally all over the place in the past couple of years. We've seen a pretty dang psychotic Jason (Battle for the Cowl) and the mellow New 52 version - these would be the extremes on both sides of Jason's varying depictions.
Honestly, I prefer the more villainous Jason. New 52 Jason feels kind of bland to me. I've only just started picking up Red Hood and the Outlaws from the beginning and I'm finding that I feel like I'm reading a rehash of Nightwing trying to be slightly edgier.
Would people prefer Jason to stay as he is or assume a more antagonistic role? Or perhaps reach the middle ground (I'd say Under the Red Hood did a pretty good job of that but the problem seems to be not knowing where to go with his personality from there)?
Exactly. You've hit the nail right on the head. That was the problem with Jason immediately after his return, the writers had no idea what to do with him and he ended up bouncing all over the Bat Universe and even the greater DC Universe, with no clear purpose, always going on and on about his death. I loved Under the Red Hood, still have both trades right behind me as a matter of fact, but something like that can't last without any greater plan, or the character will just end up being a villain in the end. I prefer the current take on the character, because it shows growth, and DC really seems to know what they want the character doing now.
@FadeToBlackBolt Really? Why?
Not knocking your opinion or saying its wrong as if i'm superior, it's simply that you're honestly the first person i've come across who prefers that version over all others, and i'm curious as to why it worked for you.
Log in to comment