Iron Man 2: 3-D Or Not 3-D, That Is The Question

Avatar image for gmanfromheck
gmanfromheck

42524

Forum Posts

259238

Wiki Points

192889

Followers

Reviews: 472

User Lists: 2

Edited By gmanfromheck

 3-D glasses required?
 3-D glasses required?

Back in September, Jon Favreau talked about the 3-D technology and whether or not Iron Man 2 would be in 3-D.  Favreau mentioned seeing some of James Cameron's Avatar and being excited by the 3-D technology.  Favreau then went to Marvel and talked about doing Iron Man 2 in 3-D.  The biggest drawback is making a movie in 3-D raises the costs of the film.  With Avatar making $1 billion worldwide and if you watched the movie, you can't argue that it was a successful 3-D movie.
 
The bad news if you like 3-D movies and are looking forward to Iron Man 2, it will not be in 3-D (as reported by Market Saw a couple weeks ago).  With the current push towards 3-D movie, this is a little surprising.  Would having Iron Man 2 in 3-D make the movie better or worse?  There is no escaping the 'new technology.'  3-D movies will soon become an industry standard, despite the number of people that say watching 3-D movies gives them headaches.
 
It's a little surprising that cost could be the main concern with making Iron Man 2 in 3-D.  Last week, the Philadelphia Daily News ran an article on the number of 2010 movies being released in 3-D.  You've probably heard that Alice In Wonderland and Tron Legacy, among others, will be in 3-D.  Did you know that the next Jackass movie will also be in 3-D (set for an October release)?  Making 3-D movies costs more, hence the higher ticket price.  It becomes a question of how successful a movie has to be to make the 3-D technology worth it.  If Avatar wasn't in 3-D, it wouldn't have been the same movie in my opinion (I was not impressed with the story).  
 
The first 3-D movie I remember seeing in theaters was Parasite back in 1982 (the movie even had a young Demi Moore in it).  3-D movies have come a long way.  Should all movies go 3-D?  What is it about 3-D movies that gives some viewers headaches and doesn't affect others?  Is Iron Man missing the boat by not being in 3-D?
Avatar image for the_prez
The Prez

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#1  Edited By The Prez

for me the 3D as made on Avatar is a add on, just to make deep on the places they are. But would be could see that movie doing great on the 3D, anyways I doubt pay 8.35 (thats how we pay to see a 3d movie in Puerto RIco). IM2 is gonna be great.

Avatar image for mavfan626
mavfan626

4564

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By mavfan626

kewl..

Avatar image for drawme
drawme

429

Forum Posts

58648

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By drawme

I don´t have to watch the movie in 3D, although I wouldn´t say no when it would be a 3D one.

Avatar image for they_killed_cap_
They Killed Cap!

2268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By They Killed Cap!

IDK...most 3d movies are needless. Few movies done in 3d live up to their potential in 3d. The only one I have seen that I respected for its use of 3d was Avatar. So i guess I would say no don't do it and save me the 3 bucks on the ticket price.
Avatar image for gregomasta
Gregomasta

358

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Gregomasta
@The Prez said:
" for me the 3D as made on Avatar is a add on, just to make deep on the places they are. But would be could see that movie doing great on the 3D, anyways I doubt pay 8.35 (thats how we pay to see a 3d movie in Puerto RIco). IM2 is gonna be great. "
$14 in Chicago for a 3d movie.
Avatar image for the_prez
The Prez

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By The Prez
@Gregomasta said:
" @The Prez said:
" for me the 3D as made on Avatar is a add on, just to make deep on the places they are. But would be could see that movie doing great on the 3D, anyways I doubt pay 8.35 (thats how we pay to see a 3d movie in Puerto RIco). IM2 is gonna be great. "
$14 in Chicago for a 3d movie. "
wow thank God I have to pay less
Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Hamz

Whether a movie is in 3-D or not doesn't determine if it'll be a success at the box office or a bust. What determines that is the actual content of the movie. I personally don't care for seeing a movie in 3-D, I'd rather see it in good old fashioned 2-D and more importantly I'd rather the movie makers were focused on making good movies, not just movies in 3-D.
 
Iron Man 2 not being a 3-D movie won't hurt it. What will hurt it is if the movie sucks, but so far things seem rather positive about it so I doubt it will flop. If it came out in 3-D I wouldn't mind either, I would still watch it in 2-D however :)

Avatar image for gmanfromheck
gmanfromheck

42524

Forum Posts

259238

Wiki Points

192889

Followers

Reviews: 472

User Lists: 2

#8  Edited By gmanfromheck

I had absolutely no desire to see Avatar.  I just couldn't get excited over it from the trailer.  The only reason I saw it was to see it in 3-D (I heard a lot of "you have to see it on the big screen in 3-D," etc).  If it was not in 3-D, I'm not even sure I would've seen in on DVD or Blu-ray.

Avatar image for xerox_kitty
xerox_kitty

17342

Forum Posts

275139

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 22

#9  Edited By xerox_kitty
@G-Man said:
"What is it about 3-D movies that gives some viewers headaches and doesn't affect others? "
It's the technology that goes into making it 3D.  The best way to describe it is that you're seeing 2 pictures at the same time.  The glasses filter the two images, so the right eye sees one image, while the left eye sees the other.  It has a subconscious effect on your eyes, forcing them to strain ever so slightly... so a couple of minutes wont bother you.  But a three hour show can cause a bit of a headache. 
 
If it was in 3D then I'd go to see it.  The opening scenes from Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince in 3D were fun, and much better than the so-called 3D they had for Order of the Phoenix.  I'm gonna make sure I see Alice in Wonderland in IMAX 3D as well... I'll just make sure to pack some codeine filled painkillers with me for afterwards!
Avatar image for precise
Precise

21954

Forum Posts

17461

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By Precise

I'm personally not a fun of those 3-D movies.. Can't really explain it but it just doesn't watch good. That didn't make any sense did it?..

Avatar image for innervenom123
InnerVenom123

29886

Forum Posts

1786

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

#11  Edited By InnerVenom123

YES! YES YES YES! 
 
:D I loved the 3D in "Avatar" (Great movie btw) and I would LOVE to see it in Iron Man 2! :D
Avatar image for themess1428
TheMess1428

2211

Forum Posts

7470

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

#12  Edited By TheMess1428

My dad can't watch 3D movies because his left eye is glass. This tends to become a problem.

Avatar image for danhimself
danhimself

21433

Forum Posts

36958

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#13  Edited By danhimself

I didn't feel like Avatar really needed to be in 3-D...there wasn't really anything that I noticed besides the computer screens and thing floating through the air 
 
I'm one of those people who gets a headache when I watch something in 3-D for to long and personally I think it's a fad that companies are doing just because everyone else is doing it....I'm not a fan but if it's the only way that I get to see a movie then I'll suffer through it

Avatar image for vuki
vuki

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#14  Edited By vuki

I don't understand. James Cameron shot Avatar having in mind it'll be 3D. There were multiple cameras from different angles, so we could get realistic 3D image with depth as a result. How the hell is Favreau gonna do that ?
Imho, he saw some big boys playing with 3D and now he wants a new toy. Back the **** off and let Iron Man 2 be 2D. End of the Story.

Avatar image for gmanfromheck
gmanfromheck

42524

Forum Posts

259238

Wiki Points

192889

Followers

Reviews: 472

User Lists: 2

#15  Edited By gmanfromheck
@xerox-kitty: My question is why does it bother some and not others?  Back in October, my daughter and I watched the double feature of Toy Story and Toy Story 2 in 3-D.  We made it through fine.  My wife, though, is not a fan of 3-D movies.
Avatar image for media_master
Media_Master

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By Media_Master

What the hell, do it 3-D for kicks.

Avatar image for kid_zombie
Kid_Zombie

824

Forum Posts

32

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Kid_Zombie

I think it would be smart to have some parts in 3D, obviously it wont be crazy 3D like some movies like Avatar (it was the first movie to use that  technology) but it is what the movies these days are heading towards might as well be part of the curve then not at all. Avatar was amazing visually but the story was terrible, just cant get past bad writing and very cheesy diologe in a movie. So it would be cool to have a good story in a crazy 3D movie as well. Ah well maybe Iron Man 3 or Thor will bring that to me.

Avatar image for the_martian
The_Martian

37399

Forum Posts

15361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By The_Martian

If its done the way Avatar was, then I say 3D. But I hate in most 3D movies how they make a scene just to get a 3D effect.

Avatar image for sora_thekey
sora_thekey

8812

Forum Posts

18983

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 8

#19  Edited By sora_thekey
@G-Man said:
" @xerox-kitty: My question is why does it bother some and not others?  Back in October, my daughter and I watched the double feature of Toy Story and Toy Story 2 in 3-D.  We made it through fine.  My wife, though, is not a fan of 3-D movies. "
In my case I've never been fan of 3D movies because I get tiered easily... My I've only seen 2 3D movies, and it has been at theme parks... They look good, but still I get tired!

@The Prez said:
" @Gregomasta said:
" @The Prez said:
" for me the 3D as made on Avatar is a add on, just to make deep on the places they are. But would be could see that movie doing great on the 3D, anyways I doubt pay 8.35 (thats how we pay to see a 3d movie in Puerto RIco). IM2 is gonna be great. "
$14 in Chicago for a 3d movie. "
wow thank God I have to pay less "

Really? I have to pay the equivelent of...... $5 or $6 to see a 3D film! 
 
Avatar image for king_saturn
King Saturn

223287

Forum Posts

509

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By King Saturn  Online
I think Iron Man 2 will be great the way it is... we dont really need a 3-D experience for this film... and plus most 3-D experiences with films arent all that great... Avatar was great in 3-D but thats not because of the 3-D effect alone... Avatar was a great film period... so a person really wouldnt have lost a whole hell of a lot if he saw it in 2-D rather than 3-D... he actually would have saved himself maybe 4 or 5 bucks... lol 
Avatar image for cmaprice
cmaprice

867

Forum Posts

46

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#21  Edited By cmaprice

3D in Iron Man?
 
A world of no.

Avatar image for ahmed_sherif
Ahmed Sherif

283

Forum Posts

5749

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#22  Edited By Ahmed Sherif

Oh man Iwanted it to be 3-D

Avatar image for venom32708
venom32708

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By venom32708

just keep iron man 2-D simple and cheap because i do not want to pay 4 extra dollars for the 3-D  effect its dumb 
Avatar image for thesavageassasin
TheSavageAssasin

2688

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#24  Edited By TheSavageAssasin

Good,i only liked Avatar in 3-D i Hate any other 3-D i have seen!

Avatar image for super_man_23
SUPER-MAN 23

2667

Forum Posts

9994

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 789

User Lists: 8

#25  Edited By SUPER-MAN 23

We already have so many movies with 3-D. I wonder If this is Disney's deal with marvel, To make all of the movies 3-D? Hmm.. Don't know?   

Avatar image for red_l_a_m_p_
Red L.A.M.P.

2781

Forum Posts

15190

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#26  Edited By Red L.A.M.P.

After seeing Avatar 3D.... I vote YES for Iron Man 2 in 3D.

Avatar image for moomin123
Moomin123

2252

Forum Posts

2321

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 3

#27  Edited By Moomin123

 
I'll like the film wheterh it's in 3D or not. But it would be nice to see it that way.

Avatar image for ikkybooger
Ikkybooger

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#28  Edited By Ikkybooger

I'm a big fan of 3D. The effect makes movies all the more real for me. It doesn't hurt my eyes in the least. Wish I could explain why it does for some people. I've seen Avatar 3 time in 3D and each time I'm amazed. It's my hope that 3D will become standard. It's unfortunate to hear that Iron Man 2 won't be 3D but I guess I can just hope for an inevitable Iron Man 3 in 3D.  
 
 
And btw, a lot of you are saying 3D is like 5 or 6 bucks more. Dunno where you're going to see these movies, but it's always been just 3 more bucks for me. Totally worth it.

Avatar image for shima
Shima

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By Shima
the only 3-d movie I've like so far was monster vs aliens. the whole object coming at you cr@p is already old and disappointing. use the 3d to make the movie better not just to fool the viers. that's why i liked monsters vs aliens the whole thing is 3d not just some parts and they didn't do the "object coming at you" cr@p so many times.
Avatar image for gank
Gank

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By Gank

I wasn't totally psyched to see Avatar, but afterward I was glad I did. Loved the 3-D and think Iron Man 2 in 3-D would be awesome as well - just imagine how sweet the flying scenes would be. They could always just wait and make the third one 3-D.

Avatar image for bingbangboom
bingbangboom

782

Forum Posts

814

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

#31  Edited By bingbangboom

I think that this type of movie would lend itself pretty good for the 3D conversion with just how the character is. I hope Marvel decides to do this because there would be a strong possibility that it could do just as good as Avatar. The only other possibility I could think of is they re-release the movie in theaters  in 3D with additional content aka Captain America trailer or cameo, that would be like late summer or fall.

Avatar image for aronmorales
Aronmorales

9735

Forum Posts

173

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#32  Edited By Aronmorales

Meh on 3-D, 5-D IS THE WAY TO GO!!!

Avatar image for xerox_kitty
xerox_kitty

17342

Forum Posts

275139

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 22

#33  Edited By xerox_kitty
@G-Man said:
" @xerox-kitty: My question is why does it bother some and not others?  Back in October, my daughter and I watched the double feature of Toy Story and Toy Story 2 in 3-D.  We made it through fine.  My wife, though, is not a fan of 3-D movies. "
There's too many variables.  Like, does she normally wear glasses, but didn't when you saw the film?  Or does she usually suffer from migraines?  Different bodies are effected in different ways... 
 
I think the Toy Story 2 3D is about to come out over here... Hopefully I'll get chance to see that one too :)

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.