I came to the view that Hulk would mostly beat Thor because Hulk is more durable and his power set is tailor made for physical confrontations. Thor's tendency to duke it out with his foes only plays into Hulk's hands and Hulk's defence can outlast Thor's offence.
Thor is far more durable than Hulk is. Hulk has a much better healing factor than Thor however. For example adamantium bullets would bounce off Thor's skin while with a base level Hulk they may bruise him a little bit but he would instantaneously heal from them. Of course, when Hulk gets to world war hulk mode then the adamantium bullets bounce off him as well.
Also this idea that Thor is "vulnerable to physical blunt force attacks" is completely baseless. Do you have any examples whatsoever of Thor being "vulnerable to blunt force attacks"? This seems like a convenient attempt to put Thor in the same category as wonder woman just because both are Gods. Thor can tank adamantium bullets and weaponry so his blunt force/physical attack durability is undoubtedly very high level.
Also Hulk's healing factor should not be confused with his "defence". Defense is a mix of durability/healing factor. Hulk has a good healing factor, and good durability. Thor's healing factor is not as good as Hulks (however using Mjolnir he can heal broken limbs/wounds the same way Hulk can), however Thor's durability far exceeds Hulks durability.
Thor has plenty of times tanked planet busting attacks and above. His durability is on par with, maybe even superior to Superman. Hulk's durability is not comparable to superman or thor, but his healing factor is excellent.