@bezza
Well to be fair, Hulk is also a team buster too. Thanos only tangles with Galactus because Jim Starlin allows it, plus Hulk has beaten down Thor and Silver Surfer before too. I don't get why people think losing to Hulk is so embarrassing though. If Thor and Thanos make a mockery of Galactus, people are fine but when Hulk does the same to Thor, Thanos or Galactus it's automatically PIS while everyone else gets away with doing it. It's just not fair.
The only trouble he may have is with speed and that's where a speedster's argument comes in. It is generally said, Hulk has the ability to overpower anyone given the right conditions. He has a counter for pretty much everything as shown over the years such as draining, transmutation, mind control and many others, however against opponents with no speed advantage Hulk still gets underrated heavily against the likes of Thanos or Kurse who's speed is inferior to Hulk's which is what disturbs me most of the time. Given Hulk's ferocity, defenses and never-give-up attitude, no opponent that isn't abstract should stomp him, even if he lacks versatility among them.
I don't have a problem with Hulk losing, its just how he's viewed by others in the battle forums and then there's the issue of consistency between them. Certain users would side with Hulk against certain characters such as Superman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern or Darkseid, but when the time calls for them to support Hulk again, they turn a blind eye when that character is Dr Doom, Thor, Silver Surfer or Thanos. This only shows that Hulk is used for nothing more than a tool to drag others down while he's being kept down himself. Winning and losing is part of life, but being called a loser you're whole life is just wrong.
On further note, I'd personally put Hulk in a class of his own. He easily fluctuates between levels. He may be all brute force but its been shown in comics before that brute force characters can hang with higher tiers.
Log in to comment