it was announced Antman will not be in Avengers 2: age of Ultron

Oh my god!! That sucks...They should just give the rights back to Marve...oh wait.....

Bet you Ironman makes Ultron

I heard that on facebook and CBR, it's horrible

LAAAAAAAAAMEEEE......

They could totally introduce Ant-man in this movie, they did it with Hawkeye.

... well, there goes all my hype.

Doesn't mean he can't make Ultron at the end of Ant-Man...

Pym will probably just be a scientist in the movie and then it will lead into the Ant-Man movie.

Joss Whedon said that we'll see Ultrons origin story in Avengers 2 though.

Sadly this does seem likely to me.

@v_scarlotte_rose: Kind of makes you wish RDJ had walked doesn't it.

@joshmightbe: Yep. There are lots of Avengers in the comics, so characters leaving could just be replaced with others.

I would be fine with Iron Man not being there.

I feel like I should be more upset about this... after all, I do like Antman... but it doesn't actually bother me all that much. I'd even be totally fine with Tony Stark creating Ultron; frankly, I think that makes more sense within the Cinematic universe

Nuts. But I have been wanting to say aloud that that piece above by Paulo Rivera is unbelievably amazing.

This is absurd. How can you have Ultron and no Hank Pym?! RAGE!!

Where was it announced Hank Pym wouldn't be in Avengers2?

@war_killer: Joss Whedon said so in a video interview. It's in this thread: http://www.comicvine.com/avengers/4060-3806/forums/joss-whedon-gives-details-about-avengers-age-of-ul-1479979/#18

Kinda lame. Sounds like they're giving that to Tony.

Video won't play on the computer I'm correctly on... v__v

But even if Hank Pym isn't in the movie physically, that doesn't mean they couldn't still reference him in the movie as being the one who created the artificial intelligence of Ultron and have Tony being the one who weaponized it for S.H.I.E.L.D. or something. They did something similar in Avengers: EMH where both Hank and Tony designed Ultron together and could be what they plan to do here.

But I do think it needs to be taking into consideration that Avengers 2 is still more than a year away, meaning that things Whedon says now could very possible change in the coming months as they move forward with production.

NOOO!!

I love Antman, and it sucks that he hasn't been in any of the movies yet. He's a founding Avenger, he needs more screen!

@war_killer: Fair enough, but with his movie slated for after Avengers 2, there doesn't seem to be much hope for him.

Just because his movie is slated after Avengers 2 doesn't mean he can't appear before then. They could easily have him appear in Avengers 2, or simply reference him in the movie, which could lead into his solo film. Not to mention, even though I doubt they will, they could also make Ant-Man as a prequel. There were rumors with Hank Pym having been Ant-Man during like the 70s and with Scott Lang being the modern day Ant-Man, so there are many ways to have Hank Pym appear before his solo movie.

SAD FACE

@war_killer: I know. It just sucks that they've been putting him off for so long.

And I never heard that 70's Antman theory. That would be cool to see.

Wow, they took away such an important part of Hank's character/history. Bullshit.