@csg_cl:
Well, this is the Comicvine X-Men forum, where the only thing to do is to push things way too far.
You're not wrong, but you're missing the point. Yes, the male power fantasy is the bread and butter of heroic comics. If you're saying it's hypocritical of me to invalidate female heroics because of male heroics, you'd be right. However, that wasn't the point I was making. In the last issue of Gold, Nightcrawler and Piotr do basically the same sequence. The exception is being Nightcrawler is one of the established acrobatic fighters of the team, even without teleporting. And Colossus (despite being drawn Juggernaut sized) is still a heavy hitter without his powers.
Kitty being a melee combatant has been established, but the recurring theme is that we've been told she's a 'ninja' instead of shown. It's a storytelling hard and fast rule that has increasingly been pushed aside. DC's 'The Silencer' is not my kind of book, but at least they had a methodical explanation and presentation of how the 'protagonist' has the technique to justify her being a qualified and tangible assassin. In X-Men Gold, Kitty dodges all the things and finishes it with one kick. Rachel manages to clean sweep two of them citing Wolverine training. And I'd actually have no problem with claiming Psylocke trained them - until I realize the Jean Grey book where Psylocke trains her is not something I want to cite.
And the other half of the problem is the potency of your villains. This is a typical problem, and the few exceptional cases where its done right are ... well, exceptional. We're treated to four antagonists for the prison fight, and despite one being presented as immeasurably tall, it's all talk in a typical 'David and Goliath' fight. But they're either talented in hand to hand and we never see it, or they aren't and they're just dumb for trying to take on the X-Men.
To address what you've said, though... the good old "people wanting to see more than just a bunch of straight white dudes in comics isn't a bad thing" is a pretty common neutrality point. That statement in a vacuum is all fine and good, but put it into context and application and I'll have to disagree. I'm all for more heroes, more backstories, more powers, more teamwork, more identity, and more character interaction. For the most part, the X-Men has been the melting pot for a diverse cast of characters despite being an American centric book. What Marvel has done however, is replaced all the 'white male' leadership in a few strokes, and shoved the large majority of white male characters to the wayside.
My opinion on the matter is that the best form of diversity is to mix and co-operate; blend the old with the new. For the most part, DC has done this pretty well, though largely on the back of their tried and true Justice League. For the X-Men however, all the main color books (Red, Gold, Blue) have put the typical 'white man' out of the leadership position. Cyclops is gone, Wolverine is in the wind, Xavier is sort of back? Magneto is basically a lone wolf. The one exception is Cable, who actually had a fun team for a while. Rogue and Gambit was a nice mutual story with a great emphasis on character history.
But X-Men Red? That's Jean Grey's vision, so I can't fault them for that.
X-Men Gold? It's effectively Kitty Pryde and the X-Men.
X-Men Blue? This one's a little harder to pin down, but it is basically a second Teen Jean Grey book.
This has been a long rant, so I'll wrap up the last of the points. I'd have more respect for the prison brawl if the legit prisoners actually brought shivs and improvised weapons. At least it would make the fight more interesting. As for Cyclops, Peter and Bobby getting into such a fight, Adult Cyclops is dead, Peter would basically carry the team, and Bobby... well, he's trained by Wolverine too I guess.
@pyrofn:
You mean the four prisoners being the top of the food chain? I honestly only thought of it at the end of this post, but wouldn't the top of the food chain have shivs and improvised weapons? I don't pretend to know anything about prison life, but yeah, that entire thing rubbed me the wrong way.
You'll know we've come circle if they talk about improper incarceration at some point, though.
Log in to comment