@Ash_Walmer: Wow you dont say. So is he a character dependant on gadgets? I dont mean to be nosey its just that I tend to get intel on my targets before well....you know :)
EDIT: Just checked that link.
@Ash_Walmer: Wow you dont say. So is he a character dependant on gadgets? I dont mean to be nosey its just that I tend to get intel on my targets before well....you know :)
EDIT: Just checked that link.
@Kratesis said:
Kratesis has a code.
SLAKE doesn't get used unless she intends to kill.
If she gives her word, she keeps it. Period.
when does Kratesis give her word?
She is more important than anybody and everybody else. Utilitarianism is a lie. The most good for Arturia should be the law of the land, everywhere.
This has become a problem lately, because she's started making connections and caring about others, even to the point of risking her life. Big problem.
Ashley Knightfall: Show mercy to those who are merciless. Show grace to the disfavored. Show love to the hateful. Show forgiveness to the resentful. Protect the defenseless. Help the unfortunate. Give to the needy.
Observe the psyker with caution.
Slaughter the alien without mercy.
Deny the demon with your hatred.
Ashley Knightfall: Show mercy to those who are merciless. Show grace to the disfavored. Show love to the hateful. Show forgiveness to the resentful. Protect the defenseless. Help the unfortunate. Give to the needy.
Ashley is made of
We are fundamentally disagreed on these.
@emperor_von_doom: Lol, she kills during wartime if that means anything to you :P
@emperor_von_doom: Very true, but there are options in a civilized society while in wartime there is only one course of action. Helena believes you should only kill someone if there is no other option and if the government can’t contain the threat after it’s been stopped. Now wartime is a different story ?. Helena and her people follow the Geneva Convention by the way ?.
Helena and her people follow the Geneva Convention by the way ?.
They're missing out.
Rad-weaponry, phosphex, and volkite weapons are all really fun to use on bloodthirsty aliens! :[
@emperor_von_doom: Are the bloodthirsty aliens ruthless and evil? Do they ever surrender?
Well, this is a basic breakdown: Orks want to fight everything, Tyranids want to eat everything, Necrons want to kill everything, Daemons want to corrupt everything, Eldar and their various incarnations want to be the only ones who survive, and Tau want to rule everything with their dumb SPACE COMMUNISM.
I think that's it.
And no, surrender isn't an option for any of them. They're all dumb.
@emperor_von_doom: Then we will slay them together lol. Helena and her people are willing to bend the rules of the Geneva Convention depending on the circumstance they are in, forgot to mention that. They certainly will not kill innocent life though, that’s one rule that will not be bent.
Well, that's reasonable. Just following the conventions of the Geneva Convention when the targets are completely and utterly inhuman by nature is sort of redundant.
WE SHALL CRUSADE TOGETHER!
A little complicated, depends on various factors. However, a few constants:
Cull is wholly convinced that humans are either extinct or endangered at alternating times of the day. He doesn't know which way is up, but he'll be damned if he won't get there.
Kellan's ethical standards are unconventional. They're founded upon his disbelief or unbelief in heroes and heroism in general and how he identifies as an "avenger" as opposed to a hero. It is his belief that heroes are ultimately failures at worst and good natured fools at best. His rationale behind this belief is that heroes cling so rigidly to their righteous morals and code of conduct e.g. self-imposed no-kill rules etc. that their ability to effectively and efficiently tackle threats to society are held back by the moral limits of their own codes.
For this reason, Kellan believes heroes to be selfish as they always avoid the discomfort of taking difficult decisions that conflict with their subjective beliefs but ultimately benefit the many, making heroes more likely to let a villain go under the false pretense of "giving them a second chance" or "showing them the error of their ways" and risking future incidents instead of immediately terminating the threat e.g. killing the villain. Staying true to their morals while evil triumphs is the only success Kellan believes heroes truly experience, and as a result, he has little respect for them. Instead, he identifies as an avenger given his desire to punish those who commit crimes and acts of villainy.
Saving people directly accomplishes nothing in his opinion, and even simply killing criminals, terrorists etc. will yield limited success. Instead, Kellan's goal is to establish and propagate a culture of crippling fear in the world in order to prevent crime. His attempts at doing so involve subjecting his enemies to excruciating torture, both physical and psychological, and the public use of terror tactics e.g. hanging the flayed skin of a villain or criminal in very elaborate and public displays. It is all done to induce enough fear in the general populace that even the foulest people will think twice before committing crimes or evil given the consequences he presents.
He reasons that while many criminals and villains are willing to die, they are not willing to be permanently disabled or tortured to the inhumane extremes he goes to. And fear is his primary weapon because few things embed into culture and last for generations like fear and the superstitions it inspires.
Code of ethics? As in a set of rules I set for myself to avoid doing dumb things? No, thanks. I think I can avoid doing dumb things without setting rules for it.
"Myeeaah, who am I throwing shade at? Eeeh, I don't knoww."
@rosso: Not really. To Vincent's knowledge, Abigail doesn't kill. What happened at Blackhouse was an accident when she lost control of her powers. Actual murder is premeditated and thought out. From Vincent's pov, that was an accident. Now a'days, Vincent is focused on rebuilding the League into something new. So if Abigail has started to kill, then he's not aware of it.
Originally, Vincent did think that Abigail was naive. But deep down, part of him wanted to buy into her code. She seemed genuine to Vincent because she truly was. She made Vincent believe that redemption was at one point possible. But given the way that Vincent was raised, not to mention Dullhamit's lie and everything else that happened with Strix and the League...now if anything, Vincent see's himself as something that's expendable in Abigail's war with strix. Seriously, wasn't meant as a slight.
@_dirge_: I was talking more about the fact she [usually] tries to conduct herself with honor and acts on a sense of perceived duty. >_>
And nope. I'm not gonna talk about it here because I'm gonna save that in case something happens IC. ;-P
C'mon, Grif! It's not an actual slight! I'm just talking shit!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment