Who was worse - Hitler, Stalin or Mao?

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Who was worse - Hitler, Stalin or Mao? (191 votes)

Adolf Hitler 37%
Joseph Stalin 35%
Mao Zedong 28%
No Caption Provided

 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-614ce5c370323
deactivated-614ce5c370323

10069

Forum Posts

1569

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The president of Canada. Never seems to want to show up when we need him.

Avatar image for mr_dead_guy
Mr_Dead_Guy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Don't know why Adolf has a vote.

Avatar image for mysticmedivh
mysticmedivh

32487

Forum Posts

570

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for tjd2814
tjd2814

534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sophia89: Mao killed more people, so him.

If we're going by evil acts, and not numbers, then Stalin.

Avatar image for allstarsuperman
AllStarSuperman

51192

Forum Posts

148

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By AllStarSuperman  Online

Trump

Avatar image for removekebab
removekebab

3794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Stalin was an irredemable monster my dudes.

Avatar image for rdclip
RDClip

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao, he killed much more than either, destroyed Chinese culture during the cultural revolution and held the country back for decades. Unfortunately not many people know how much of a monster he is compared to other tyrants due to the Chinese communists basically seeing him as a saint.

Avatar image for pipxeroth
pipxeroth

10000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for king_nomarch
King_Nomarch

2115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for lord_spectrum
Lord_Spectrum

4244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sophia89 said:

Mao killed more people, so him.

If we're going by evil acts, and not numbers, then Stalin.

Avatar image for manchine
Manchine

6360

Forum Posts

7931

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Nobama

Avatar image for dshipp17
dshipp17

7650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By dshipp17

Despite body count, the worse of the three was clearly Hitler; we have to look to plans and goals; Hitler wanted to eliminate entire ethic groups and was stopped in his efforts, prematurely. Stalin and Mao were the worse dictators possible (and some of those Roman Emperors who persecuted Christians were even worse still, as they did have a similar, but inferior level of wickedness of a Hitler kind, as they wanted to cleans the world of all Christians, but not all other ethnic groups) , but Hitler was on a whole different level; he literally had an objective to wipe out the entire Jewish race and nonwhites from the face of the Earth and existence, and clearly had made great strides to that end, but was stopped short of achieving his goal, while the other two, as bad as they were, had nothing planned on that level.

Avatar image for rabumalal
RabumAlal

5747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

None of them did anything wrong. Mao doesn't have a mustache so him.

Avatar image for Penguin-Dust
Penguin-Dust

13937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@sophia89 said:

Mao killed more people, so him.

....

@rdclip said:

Mao, he killed much more than either, destroyed Chinese culture during the cultural revolution and held the country back for decades. Unfortunately not many people know how much of a monster he is compared to other tyrants due to the Chinese communists basically seeing him as a saint.

Mao

Avatar image for leem724
LeeM724

1182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Honestly? All three did some seriously messed up sh!#t, however of all three the act that horrifies me the most was the Holodomor carried out by Stalin. Forced Starvation has to be one of the worst ways to go.

Avatar image for the_stegman
the_stegman

41911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#18  Edited By the_stegman  Moderator

Hitler caused WWII, I'm saying him.

Avatar image for lpnq
LpnQ

3954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Stalin.

Avatar image for orange_water
Orange_Water

6583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao is the obvious choice killed far more people and pretty much sent the Chinese into a death spiral for several years.

Avatar image for kairan1979
Kairan1979

33518

Forum Posts

3495

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 18

@dshipp17 said:

Despite body count, the worse of the three was clearly Hitler; we have to look to plans and goals; Hitler wanted to eliminate entire ethic groups and was stopped in his efforts, prematurely. Stalin and Mao were the worse dictators possible (and some of those Roman Emperors who persecuted Christians were even worse still, as they did have a similar, but inferior level of wickedness of a Hitler kind, as they wanted to cleans the world of all Christians, but not all other ethnic groups) , but Hitler was on a whole different level; he literally had an objective to wipe out the entire Jewish race and nonwhites from the face of the Earth and existence, and clearly had made great strides to that end, but was stopped short of achieving his goal, while the other two, as bad as they were, had nothing planned on that level.

Avatar image for thesuperor
TheSuperor

7773

Forum Posts

1470

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Stalin

Avatar image for deactivated-5a20a68641bc7
deactivated-5a20a68641bc7

1969

Forum Posts

1028

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Life under Hitler was probably much better than life under Mao or Stalin, but if this is a moral question then it has to be either Hitler or Stalin.

Avatar image for dshipp17
dshipp17

7650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

And, actually, if you look at the other two's technique, you can see how they could have gotten their inspiration from the activities of the Hitler regime; considering those activities, what the other two did was not separate and unique into their own. While at the same time, it looks like Hitler innovated what the Roman Emperors after Jesus did.

Avatar image for mrmonster
mrmonster

25750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao, he had the highest death toll.

Avatar image for blacklegraph
BlackLegRaph

5544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Depends on what metric you are using to judge. I'd say I view Stalin to be the worst.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a84a212043e5
deactivated-5a84a212043e5

2790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao, not even close. IMO, we're just wired to pick Hitler (maybe Stalin) because of how historically demonized he is. Because China is a world power whose economy and manufacturing industry the world relies on, we tend to turn a blind eye to him.

His regime led to the destruction of thousands of years worth of culture, and is the foundation for the world's current largest human rights abuser, the CCP.

Avatar image for lettsplay10
lettsplay10

21364

Forum Posts

1143

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Anyone thats not me

Avatar image for kamik28
Kamik28

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Rofl, how is Hitler the worse? He is a nice guy compared to the other 2.

Mao killed more than the other two combined, but Mao's deaths were due to inefficient policies and very poor leadership.

While Stalin was downright evil, he deliberately mass killed and forced his own people to die in gulags, while Hitler brought prosperity to Nazi Germany and the native Germans specifically targeting Jews and opposing the British.

Stalin was the worst human being in world war 2.

Avatar image for kfhrfdu_89_76k
kfhrfdu_89_76k

4320

Forum Posts

123136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Milton Friedman.

Avatar image for _logos_
_Logos_

3663

Forum Posts

1041

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Stalin, he was a smart and devious cunt, and the most evil of leaders, Hitler and Mao tie at second with similar goals as Stalin, but Hitler was just doing what the rest of Europe already wanted at the time (its not okay, but for the time period even Stalin's actions would've been viewed as more evil), and Mao caused the most deaths yes, but indirectly through his policies.

Avatar image for bluehope
BlueHope

2681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By BlueHope

Hittler. Stalin and Mao killed more but hittler targeted innocent people from babies to elders just because they didn't fit his idea of "perfect human", if you were a non white or handicapped he would try to kill you no matter where, non germans would be second class citizens and all countries would be forced to bow down to his empire.

At least the Communists goals(or at least their promises being honest or not) were noble, hittler just said "screw you" to everybody but his group.

Avatar image for firestormfate1919
FirestormFate1919

6217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's a close one between Mao and Stalin imo. Hitler was horrible, but not quite on their level.

Avatar image for cptstormsword
cptstormsword

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao had that body count.

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mao probably had the numbers, but I think it's really between Stalin and Hitler for pure evil. I'd probably go with Stalin between those two, but he was not much worse than Hitler.

Avatar image for anakon4
anakon4

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hitler at least bumped the economy and didn't kill so many people of his. He is the best guy here.

Stalin drowned his country in blood, killed every important communist from revolution. Killed more people than Hitler, but at least had some industrial increase in relatively short time.

Mao was a a devil in human form.

Avatar image for anakon4
anakon4

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By anakon4

@dshipp17 said:

Despite body count, the worse of the three was clearly Hitler; we have to look to plans and goals; Hitler wanted to eliminate entire ethic groups and was stopped in his efforts, prematurely. Stalin and Mao were the worse dictators possible (and some of those Roman Emperors who persecuted Christians were even worse still, as they did have a similar, but inferior level of wickedness of a Hitler kind, as they wanted to cleans the world of all Christians, but not all other ethnic groups) , but Hitler was on a whole different level; he literally had an objective to wipe out the entire Jewish race and nonwhites from the face of the Earth and existence, and clearly had made great strides to that end, but was stopped short of achieving his goal, while the other two, as bad as they were, had nothing planned on that level.

Stalin at least protected his folk, which makes him better leader than anyone who kills willingly his own people. You are talking about Hitler like he was the only one who ever killed specificaly other race.

Americans killed around 60,000,000 of native americans.

Stalin killed up to 7, 500, 000 of his OWN people of hunger + millions in world war.

You really compare fanatic patriot, to fanatic idiots?

Avatar image for kamik28
Kamik28

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dshipp17 said:

Despite body count, the worse of the three was clearly Hitler; we have to look to plans and goals; Hitler wanted to eliminate entire ethic groups and was stopped in his efforts, prematurely. Stalin and Mao were the worse dictators possible (and some of those Roman Emperors who persecuted Christians were even worse still, as they did have a similar, but inferior level of wickedness of a Hitler kind, as they wanted to cleans the world of all Christians, but not all other ethnic groups) , but Hitler was on a whole different level; he literally had an objective to wipe out the entire Jewish race and nonwhites from the face of the Earth and existence, and clearly had made great strides to that end, but was stopped short of achieving his goal, while the other two, as bad as they were, had nothing planned on that level.

This is some disinfo you'd expect to hear from the most ignorant 12 y/o antifa.

Get your facts straight, Hitler was not racist, he was anti-Semite. Hitler allied with the Japanese and considered them honorary aryans, he respected Muslims and Islam because of their shared views on Jews, The nazi swastika was related to Hindu religious symbols, Hitler wanted to free the British colonies, from the British, I.E. India.

"I am sure that the Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France, in spite of the fact that we are related by blood."

He said "I respect the lowliest Indian more than any arrogant Islander (referring to the British)", does that sound like a white supremacist to you?

Hitler had a burning hatred for Jews, the British and the Slavs but the later ones was probably because of the threat that was the Soviets and the Red Arm and the many past territorial conflicts between the Germans and Slavs near East Europe.

Avatar image for noone1996
Noone1996

15867

Forum Posts

400

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@anakon4: you do know that 90% of Native Americans were killed by viruses and diseases right? And please don't even try to tell me Americans did it in purpose by giving them smallpox blankets and the like.

Avatar image for hypnos0929
Hypnos0929

8494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Stalin by far those Gologs were hell

Avatar image for xerolot
Xerolot

3097

Forum Posts

327

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Lol Adolf is winning. Those days people lack history knowledge. Hitler compared to Stalin and Mao was peaceful and kind person

Avatar image for bardockdiaper
Bardockdiaper

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Never heard of any of them /s

Avatar image for anakon4
anakon4

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By anakon4

@noone1996 said:

@anakon4: you do know that 90% of Native Americans were killed by viruses and diseases right? And please don't even try to tell me Americans did it in purpose by giving them smallpox blankets and the like.

Viruses and diseases your ancestors willingly spread. And no, many native people died of hunger, massacres, slave work, torturing etc.

Avatar image for rubear
Rubear

4819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By Rubear

@xerolot said:

Lol Adolf is winning.
Those days people lack history knowledge. Hitler compared to Stalin and Mao was peaceful and kind person.

I sincerely advise you to stop taking drugs.

Avatar image for noone1996
Noone1996

15867

Forum Posts

400

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@anakon4: Willingly? Lmao. Nobody had even a basic understanding of what germs were back then. Keep blaming everything on the evil white boogeyman. http://www.pbs.org/gunsgermssteel/variables/smallpox.html. You're wrong. 90% were killed from diseases. The propaganda about hunger, massacres, slavery, torturing (lmao, really?) PALED in comparison to what MOSTLY and OVERWHELMINGLY caused them to die out. Having such a warped and biased view about all white people must allow you to lead such a happy life.

Avatar image for lillion1
lillion1

149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By lillion1

At least Hitler killed the Jews out of misguidedness. And there were only 6 million of them. Total number non combatants (including Jews) was 11 million. A huge number and in my oppinion he deserved something far worse than the way he died.

Stalin on the other hand killed far less Civilians than Hitler ever did but he never really had a reason for it except being a paranoid asshole. Latest numbers say about 2 to 3 million non combatants (2 long, from now on I call them civilians). Add another 5 million people that died during the famine of 1930-1933. Of those who starved, the 3.3 million or so inhabitants of Soviet Ukraine who died in 1932 and 1933 were victims of a deliberate killing policy related to nationality.

.

In this data I do not count the number of Soviet people that died during the siege of Leningrad or the number of soldiers the Nazis slaughtered in camps. Or the Nazis that were probably slaughtered in Soviet Camps (could not find exact data on this so didnt bother with comparison). Instead focusing on the unnecessary deaths instead.

.

I found this data by filling in google: how many did stalin kill compared to hitler --> clicking the first link. This is a good source and Snyders research is considered to be good by many historians. Afterwards I double checked this data using other sources. Most of these were not from the cold war cause back then most of the ''western'' data was propaganda making it worse and most ''eastern'' data was propaganda making it less worse. Basically western historians could not double check their data and guessed high.

.

So Hitler was winning, until I looked up Mao and damn. (got a warning for the f-bomb so now its damn.)

Estimations go from 48 million to almost 80 million civilian casulties. Those are more than the number of Soviets died during the war +those that died because of Stalin cruelty. A general agreed estimation is 65 million people, mostly intellectuals. Basically, if you had an education in China back then, and you were not a communist you died. If you were a communist you probably still died.

Also his policies caused some huge catastrophes, like a huge famine. More on this can apparently be found in Frank Dikötter’s book, Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62.

It is possible Mao did not want to kill his countrymen with this famine, but if you continue with your policies after seeing they do not work you kinda have to be either broken, or a complete asshole with a disregard for human lives. And considering Mao killed far more civilians that Hitler and Stalin combined and considering his estimated kill count is MORE THAN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATHS OF BOTH SOLDIERS AND CIVILIANS OF WOLD WAR 2 FROM ALL COUNTRIES COMBINED, I think it is safe to assume that Mao was the biggest asshat in history