Avatar image for modernww2fare
Posted by modernww2fare (7047 posts) 2 months, 13 days ago

Poll: Which continent has the most blood on its hands? (63 votes)

North America 14%
South America 2%
Europe 22%
Asia 49%
Africa 11%
Australia 2%
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for mrmonster
#1 Posted by mrmonster (15164 posts) - - Show Bio

What do you mean?

Online
Avatar image for modernww2fare
#2 Posted by modernww2fare (7047 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for ready_4_madness
#3 Posted by Ready_4_Madness (15889 posts) - - Show Bio

United Kingdom, USA & France are responsible for so many people’s deaths it’s not even funny.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c60ecae36801
#4 Posted by deactivated-5c60ecae36801 (745 posts) - - Show Bio

EU has the most.

Followed by Asain

then NA.

Avatar image for mrmonster
#5 Posted by mrmonster (15164 posts) - - Show Bio

It's gotta be Asia. They've had so many people over the course of human history that I can't see how they wouldn't have had the most deaths.

Online
Avatar image for invadedtbd
#6 Posted by InvadedTBD (1549 posts) - - Show Bio

Probably Asia, Europe then North America

Avatar image for veshark
#7 Posted by Veshark (10499 posts) - - Show Bio

My first instinct is Europe....between the World Wars, the Holocaust, Stalin's Great Purge and Russia's WWII casualties, colonization of both Americas etc. Then again, Asia probably comes close with the sheer amount of wars in China alone. The Three Kingdoms, Sino-Japanese War, Mongols, and I'm pretty sure Mao Zedong alone is responsible for millions of deaths e.g. the Cultural Revolution.

Avatar image for incursion2
#9 Posted by incursion2 (1932 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia, Europe then North America

Avatar image for stormdriven
#10 Posted by Stormdriven (17882 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia, then Europe

Avatar image for Penguin-Dust
#11 Posted by PenguinDust (8929 posts) - - Show Bio

Stalin and Mao alone are probably responsible for 50 million deaths, and that's just in the last century. Asia takes this one followed by Europe, Africa (it's the oldest human-occupied continent) and then North America.

Avatar image for toratorn
#12 Posted by Toratorn (7181 posts) - - Show Bio

Yeah, Asia sounds like a most likely answer. Just purges by Mao and Stalin resulted in enormous body count, and that's not even counting all the constant wars that happened there throughout the history.

Online
Avatar image for redhood_jaytodd
#13 Edited by RedHood_JayTodd (1681 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia, definitely Asia. Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin's reigns of terror alone caused an enormously high number of deaths in the many tens of millions in the last century. Add to the fact that Genghis Khan and his sons lead a long and brutal genocidal campaign via the Mongol Empire expansion in the 1200s and also the Japanese Imperial Empire's bloody territorial expansion during WW2 and you got one helluva body count that is impossible to truly fathom.

Edit: almost forgot Pol Pot and his genocide of 1/4 of Cambodia's population as well as the First Indochina War and Vietnam War.

Avatar image for jedixman
#14 Posted by JediXMan (42486 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia.

Moderator
Avatar image for mutant1230
#15 Edited by Mutant1230 (6487 posts) - - Show Bio

@mrmonster said:

It's gotta be Asia. They've had so many people over the course of human history that I can't see how they wouldn't have had the most deaths.

What if you scaled it to populations?

Avatar image for faradaysloth
#16 Posted by FaradaySloth (9339 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia by far. Africa is being underestimated though.

Avatar image for alphaq
#17 Posted by AlphaQ (6225 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia, but part of me also suspects Africa because it is the oldest and humanity's prehistory period was extremely, extremely long.

Avatar image for veshark
#18 Posted by Veshark (10499 posts) - - Show Bio

@mrmonster said:

It's gotta be Asia. They've had so many people over the course of human history that I can't see how they wouldn't have had the most deaths.

What if you scaled it to populations?

How dare you use scaling in a CV debate.

Avatar image for theoneabovelife
#19 Posted by TheOneAboveLife (924 posts) - - Show Bio

@veshark said:

My first instinct is Europe....between the World Wars, the Holocaust, Stalin's Great Purge and Russia's WWII casualties, colonization of both Americas etc. Then again, Asia probably comes close with the sheer amount of wars in China alone. The Three Kingdoms, Sino-Japanese War, Mongols, and I'm pretty sure Mao Zedong alone is responsible for millions of deaths e.g. the Cultural Revolution.

Online
Avatar image for martytannen85
#20 Edited by MartyTannen85 (116 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia was probably much more brutal than Europe in the past

Avatar image for michaelbn
#21 Posted by Michaelbn (2350 posts) - - Show Bio

It's gotta be Asia. They've had so many people over the course of human history that I can't see how they wouldn't have had the most deaths.

Avatar image for mrmonster
#22 Posted by mrmonster (15164 posts) - - Show Bio

@mrmonster said:

It's gotta be Asia. They've had so many people over the course of human history that I can't see how they wouldn't have had the most deaths.

What if you scaled it to populations?

Even then, Asia is still my first bet. Just look at all the historically very violent nations and areas; China, Japan, India, Vietnam, and the entire Middle East. Even when you scale it to population, I have a hardtime viewing any other continent as equally violent throughout history.

Online
Avatar image for lunacyde
#24 Posted by Lunacyde (28178 posts) - - Show Bio

Its gotta be Asia, though I'd guess Europe is a close second. Who gets Stalin? There's an argument for attributing him to both Asia and Europe.

Moderator
Avatar image for kirkseven
#25 Posted by Kirkseven (2683 posts) - - Show Bio

Impossible to determine.

Avatar image for theonewhopullsthestrings
#26 Edited by TheOneWhoPullsTheStrings (2746 posts) - - Show Bio

Didn't genghis Khan alone wipe out tens of millions, almost entire nations, and something like 10-15% of the entire world population at one point? Yikes. Then add in Mao Zedong, Stalin (I think that counts as Asia, or does it?), Pol Pot, Khemer Rouge, and more... Then just the three kingdoms wars in china (that was like WW1 level death numbers - but more than a thousand+ years ago), and more...

It has to be Asia by a huge margin. Even with the genocides that happened from time to time in other parts of the world, none of them really match the scope of what was seen in Asia... Not once... Not twice... Not three times, and often.

The only thing comparable is the bringing of disease to the Americas, that wiped out 90% of the pre-columbus population; but I would hardly blame that on the europeans, the first accidental contact would have done it from anywhere. And just to prove the one point about it not just being germ warfare as some want to pretend it was - the smallpox epidemic got so bad in the Incan empire 90% of the population died, one emperor died - and an entire civil war was fought on it due to some of those struggles, and THAT WAS WHEN THE FIRST CONQUISTADORS SHOWED UP, on a broken Incan empire, making it easy for them. But by that point, there was maybe one or two Incans where there would have been 10 just 40 years prior. That was because just disease from the aztecs that was brought over, spreading naturally and lethally like a worse black death south. There was a couple of north eastern US tribes that were wiped out by diseases before a single european stepped on their land to meet them.

For these reasons, I can't really put the blame on the europeans here. Hell, the idea of bacteria and germs was a lost concept on them - and largely, they even thought it was god smiting them down. If Asia discovers it first, they still get all the plagues, 90% continental population redux, but it is just from a different port of entry.

Avatar image for warlockmage
#27 Posted by Warlockmage (9213 posts) - - Show Bio

its gotta be Asia... Europe and Africa fight for 2nd place and then NA comes in 4th

Avatar image for lunacyde
#28 Posted by Lunacyde (28178 posts) - - Show Bio

Does the colonization of North America count toward Europe or North America? Slave trade?

Moderator
Avatar image for supremegeneration
#29 Posted by SupremeGeneration (11724 posts) - - Show Bio

Antarctica.

Avatar image for the_thereminist
#31 Posted by The_Thereminist (381 posts) - - Show Bio

Mars! Why do you think it was named after the god of war?

Avatar image for decaf_wizard
#32 Edited by decaf_wizard (16936 posts) - - Show Bio

@lunacyde said:

Its gotta be Asia, though I'd guess Europe is a close second. Who gets Stalin? There's an argument for attributing him to both Asia and Europe.

I wouldn't say Europe is a close second, especially because the Black Plague was attributable to the Mongol Empire who intentionally spread it in numerous cases for warfare reasons, or accidentally though trade routes. Stalin can be shared 50/50. Asia has Mao who was worse, as well as some pretty freaky dictators in history.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
#33 Posted by modernww2fare (7047 posts) - - Show Bio

@lunacyde said:

Does the colonization of North America count toward Europe or North America? Slave trade?

Europe

Avatar image for lunacyde
#34 Edited by Lunacyde (28178 posts) - - Show Bio

@decaf_wizard said:
@lunacyde said:

Its gotta be Asia, though I'd guess Europe is a close second. Who gets Stalin? There's an argument for attributing him to both Asia and Europe.

I wouldn't say Europe is a close second, especially because the Black Plague was attributable to the Mongol Empire who intentionally spread it in numerous cases for warfare reasons, or accidentally though trade routes. Stalin can be shared 50/50. Asia has Mao who was worse, as well as some pretty freaky dictators in history.

I don't doubt Asia vastly outstrips the other continents. I think my language was a bit imprecise. By close second I meant in relation to the other continents. I would say Europe is closer to Asia than it is to Australia or the Americas.

I wasn't counting disease, I mean we can attribute 80-90% population loss in the Americas to European disease transmission. Although accounts of native American populations vary widely from 2 million to 18 million in North America alone, we can safely say that tens of millions died across both American continents and the Caribbean. It's widely agreed that South and Central American populations were larger at the time.

For Europe we can look at:

  • Stalin 10-60 million (also can be attributed to Asia)
  • Hitler 13-20 million
  • King Leopold 10 million
  • European Colonization of the Americas 9-100 million. (Mostly attributable to disease)
  • Late Victorian Holocausts 30-60 million
  • World War I and half of World War II 38-80 million
  • Reconquista 7 million
  • Thirty Years War 3-11.5 million
  • Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade 1-2 million (dying just during transport)
  • And so on... dozens of smaller conflicts.

In conclusion Asia is far and away the largest (Mongol conquest, Three Kingdoms War, Crimes of Mao, Manchu conquest of China, Taiping Rebellion, Japanese War Crimes, Pol Pot, etc). Asian populations and the subsequent death tolls fro their conflicts have just been largely on a different scale.

Moderator
Avatar image for deactivated-5c97780a71ae4
#36 Posted by deactivated-5c97780a71ae4 (568 posts) - - Show Bio

Ya know honestly I'm leaning towards Europe just from the seer amount warfare cultures that existed throughout Roman to Medieval times and then you include the World Wars and the body count would just be ridiculous imo

Avatar image for sabracadabra
#37 Posted by sabracadabra (1577 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia. Huns, Mongols, Mao, Pol Pot.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
#38 Posted by WolverineBatmanFTW (1388 posts) - - Show Bio

EU, followed by Asia, followed by NA

Avatar image for supermanthor
#39 Posted by Supermanthor (18992 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia

Avatar image for ourmanuel
#40 Posted by ourmanuel (11388 posts) - - Show Bio

Europe had some insane bloodshed feats during the world wars.

Avatar image for theonewhopullsthestrings
#41 Edited by TheOneWhoPullsTheStrings (2746 posts) - - Show Bio

@ourmanuel said:

Europe had some insane bloodshed feats during the world wars.

So does Asia. Look at the bloodbath between China and Japan, battles of shanghai, massacres, etc and this is without the whole US/Allies vs Japan side. And without things like Russia here, which is part europe/asia.

Avatar image for the_wspanialy
#42 Posted by the_wspanialy (4031 posts) - - Show Bio

Either Europe or Asia.

Avatar image for king-ragnar
#43 Posted by King-Ragnar (3855 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia eclipses Europe in terms of death tolls. Mongol conquests, War of the three Kingdoms, An Lushan Rebellion, Mao Zedongs reign etc.

Online
Avatar image for sevendeadlygod
#44 Posted by SevenDeadlyGOD (196 posts) - - Show Bio

Asia by a landslide. Japanese and Chinese still hate each other for the most part.

Avatar image for diarrhearegatta
#45 Posted by DiarrheaRegatta (4627 posts) - - Show Bio

The answer is North America. Ya'll are hyping up these numbers for Mao smh