In that case, that super-God is the one true god, and he's just the automaton that I described.
Not necessarily. What if he isnt an automaton, and we human beings just dont have the ability to ever understand how?
Otherwise he must be an automaton like you said.
If that's the case, then all the more reason for us to base our beliefs on facts and science and not on blind faith, beliefs based on emotions, or weak philosophical arguments.
However, the best we can do is use logic. Any system of beliefs that starts off by saying that logic doesnt always apply is pretty much shooting itself in the foot right from the beginning. Such an argument relies purely on emotions for people to believe it, since you cant back up an argument with logic if you start off assuming that logic isnt always a valid thing.
The irony lol.
You talk about logic but arent even using it here.
He created us, and obviously when you make something you give the thing your creating certain abilities. He gave us the inability to comprehend how he could possibly not be an automaton.
What you did here was you used your emotions to guide your thinking, and as a result you ignored the fact that when one creates something, they give the thing they create certain abilities and do so for a reason.
LOL... you seem to know a lot about God and what he did or didnt do and his motivations. Oh, wait, you're also claiming that God made us in such a way that we cant understand how god works. Go ahead and reconcile that for me.
Well what you did was assert the notion that God DIDNT create us in a way that we cant fully understand his existence. And you did this because you were thinking with feelings and not logic.
You have no proof that God DIDNT create us in a way that we cant understand fully his existence. And thats your fault.