Is it okay to be homophobic

  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for rawsos
rawsos

7661

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Poll Is it okay to be homophobic (45 votes)

Yes 40%
No 60%

Can you not like gay people without being homophobic?

Are you a bad person if you are not comfortable being near or doing things with a member of the lgbtq community? Are people being forced to accept the community?

Should they be forced?

 • 
Avatar image for killianduclark
KillianDuclark

5032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Homophobia. Defined as a dislike,hatred or prejudice against homosexuals.

What you described isn't homophobia. Unless your discomfort is prompted by fear or is causing you to be prejudiced against homosexuals. Then yes you are homophobic and that's bad.

But if you feel unnerved by them for whatever reason. You aren't homophobic.

It's still dumb that anybody should feel discomfort around homosexuals unless they're doing something to legitimately warrant your discomfort. A more apt term for such people is overly sensitive and paranoid. Might also be in secure in their sexuality.

But that's just my two cents on the matter

Avatar image for last0fth3risen
last0fth3risen

2494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No, it's not okay.

Being unable to interact normally with an entire subset of the human population, based solely on the awareness of their sexuality is homophobic. Just like being inherently uncomfortable around a certain race is racist. You might not be a bad person overall because of it, but it's definitely a negative trait to have.

Avatar image for ddg
DDG

23

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No.

Avatar image for king_saturn
King Saturn

230424

Forum Posts

509

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You asking some strange questions, Rawsos. Have you recently became a Christian or Muslim ?

Avatar image for deactivated-60f71362756df
deactivated-60f71362756df

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No, it's not okay.

Being unable to interact normally with an entire subset of the human population, based solely on the awareness of their sexuality is homophobic. Just like being inherently uncomfortable around a certain race is racist. You might not be a bad person overall because of it, but it's definitely a negative trait to have.

Avatar image for cocacolaman
CocaColaMan

16461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Is it okay to be homophobic?

Define "okay" and "homophobic."

Can you not like gay people without being homophobic?

It's possible if you somehow manage to hate every individual gay person's personality without regard for their sexuality but that's not probable or realistic

Are you a bad person if you are not comfortable being near or doing things with a member of the lgbtq community?

If it's because of their personality, that's fine. If it's solely because of their lgbtness, then no

Are people being forced to accept the community?

If by forced you mean someone is threatening them, then no, though some may feel that way because of cancel culture being on a constant rise. YouTube and Google advertising support for LGBT is not forcing.

Should they be forced?

Obviously not

Avatar image for rawsos
rawsos

7661

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By rawsos

You asking some strange questions, Rawsos. Have you recently became a Christian or Muslim ?

no im just young with questions

Avatar image for king_saturn
King Saturn

230424

Forum Posts

509

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rawsos said:
@king_saturn said:

You asking some strange questions, Rawsos. Have you recently became a Christian or Muslim ?

no im just young with questions

oh

Avatar image for iknowwhoyouare
iknowwhoyouare

3644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 iknowwhoyouare  Online

Is it okay to be arachnophobic or claustrophobic?

Avatar image for ghostodoofus2
Ghostodoofus2

7844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's ok to not like gay people, I get it (my dad and all my uncles are homophobic in this sense), it is however NOT ok to be a cunt and attack gay people.

Avatar image for leonhardt
Leonhardt

2885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@last0fth3risen said:

No, it's not okay.

Being unable to interact normally with an entire subset of the human population, based solely on the awareness of their sexuality is homophobic. Just like being inherently uncomfortable around a certain race is racist. You might not be a bad person overall because of it, but it's definitely a negative trait to have.

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Basically as long as you don't do any harm,you are good. But please maybe try out being more accepting towards them?

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@divyansh13 said:

Basically as long as you don't do any harm,you are good. But please maybe try out being more accepting towards them?

Avatar image for areneacaulem
AreneaCaulem

2661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

as long as you aren't harassing physically or verbally you should be fine.

Avatar image for antebellum
Antebellum

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

In Nigeria is normal.

Avatar image for areneacaulem
AreneaCaulem

2661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

In Nigeria is normal.

True I should really say it depends on where you from and if you're religious. if you are religious then only god can judge, not man even though most religious people ignores that part of the bible/quran.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Why is it not? I have no problem if someone wants to distance themselves from me and my girlfriend just because we are homosexuals. Anyone who says otherwise is mentally challenged to a degree. Why are people so stupid these days? If it isn’t your own family member you shouldn’t have a say over them. But, regardless, if you harass me I will fight back.

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

^

The person above is the moronic side of lgbt

Avatar image for reaperthegrim
ReaperTheGrim

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

^

The person above is the moronic side of lgbt

you sound like the kind of person who calls back conservatives uncle toms

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@reaperthegrim: watching snezychan's thread made me lose Braincells, especially the one where she claimed somebody didn't die(I think,that was scummy ngl)

Avatar image for mimisalome
mimisalome

6673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If such lifestyle works for you and you're not harming anyone, who am I to tell whether it is "okay" for you or not?

Though you must learn to accept the consequences of your decisions, (if there are any), and not just blame it on society and start calling anyone who disagree with you as intolerant or bigots or whatever, like some other groups of people.

Avatar image for hittheassasin
HitTheAssasin

9693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No, it's obviously not. Generally speaking, disliking somebody because of immutable characteristics they have no way of directly changing, such as their sexuality or their race isn't really fair.

Avatar image for rawsos
rawsos

7661

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@reaperthegrim: watching snezychan's thread made me lose Braincells, especially the one where she claimed somebody didn't die(I think,that was scummy ngl)

what threads

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@rawsos said:
@divyansh13 said:

@reaperthegrim: watching snezychan's thread made me lose Braincells, especially the one where she claimed somebody didn't die(I think,that was scummy ngl)

what threads

She said that Sandy Hook never happened

Avatar image for rawsos
rawsos

7661

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Avatar image for reaperthegrim
ReaperTheGrim

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rawsos said:
@divyansh13 said:

@reaperthegrim: watching snezychan's thread made me lose Braincells, especially the one where she claimed somebody didn't die(I think,that was scummy ngl)

what threads

She said that Sandy Hook never happened

I actually do remember that. But I don't understand what that has to do with what I said.

Avatar image for phobiaxl
Phobiaxl

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As long as you aren't actively attacking or antagonizing someone based on that characteristic alone, what you think about them or if your uncomfortable around them is, or rather should be, irrelevant.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@divyansh13: Didn’t have balls to tag me or reply directly then, big man?? I guess it is surprising that many lgbtq people are like me and my girlfriend. We aren’t mentally ill attention seekers like you and E-soyboys who think we need any special protection and those idiotic crap lmao. It doesn’t matter what people think of us as long as they don’t come near us to harm us, which is something you idiots are butthurt about. Go get a life.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sylvie_dottir: @rawsos: @divyansh13: You boys have a problem with me then? What was wrong about what I had to say? Being told by the media someone got gunned down in an elementary school because “guns are bad and scary” proves it happened? I presented the evidence TO DISPROVE THE WHOLE NARRATIVE. Shut up and go away.

Avatar image for darkeryoda
darkeryoda

1826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Loading Video...

nobody fear these gay idiots they get beaten everytime show up idiot people

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@snezychan: not homophobic sorry¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And oh,I don't wanna waste time with braindead retards like you.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@divyansh13: I am homosexual and don’t feel any shame so I too cannot be Homophobic but that isn’t the point. You surely aren’t apparently homophobic but that doesn’t change the fact you are a retarded attention seeker who clearly thinks all gays should be like you. Pathetic and sad.

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@snezychan: the last sentence,you couldn't describe yourself and all your political shit well

And I love how you are saying that I am attention seeking all while falling into the so called "bait".

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@divyansh13: Baiting is a form of attention seeking. Go to an asylum and let them fix your mental issues before they get worse lol.

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@snezychan: maybe you should try that,it might stop your political thread making fetish.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for divyansh13
Divyansh13

6841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for justanoutcast
JustAnOutcast

630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Not really, the same way its not ok to be sexist or racist.Its better to not dislike them in general ofcourse, but its not as bad, as long as you dont cause any harm.

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@snezychan said:

@sylvie_dottir: @rawsos: @divyansh13: You boys have a problem with me then? What was wrong about what I had to say? Being told by the media someone got gunned down in an elementary school because “guns are bad and scary” proves it happened? I presented the evidence TO DISPROVE THE WHOLE NARRATIVE. Shut up and go away.

So 9/11 never happened because we only heard about it then, with this sound logic, lmfao. And no, where are the "alive" kids now then?

OT: Nah, don't be homophobic. As a bisexual woman, i've been sexualized a few times in the past. Basically, it also happens to bi men too, but it's gross.

Avatar image for leem724
LeeM724

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

no

Avatar image for socajunkie
SocaJunkie

12212

Forum Posts

2120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You can have whatever view you want as long as you aren’t hurting anyone.

Avatar image for penguinbegins
PenguinBegins

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

There is no such thing as homophobia, no credible psychologist or psychiatrist ever talked about such a phobia, it is simply a term invented by "progressive" fanatics to try and manipulate people into not being critical of homosexuals. at the very most "homophobia" could be called rhetoric.

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sylvie_dottir: It may or may not have happened but it is irrelevant. To me it did happen but it was instigated by the Mossad not some Muslim hijackers. The point is Sandy Hook definitely didn’t happen because the Court literally turned the first amendment THE FIRST LAW of our country into a toilet paper and ordered Alex Jones to pay the fine for something he has been approved by the laws to say. The court went against its own principles and that is how we know they tried to cover the trails to the truth of the event. It didn’t happen so deal with it. Why need a law to censor someone if that which they speak is false? The only reason for it is that they speak the truth and are destroying your narrative… Besides IT HAPPENED IN AMERICA, not under some dictatorship, where freedom of expression has been absolute for centuries and has been a theme of this country. Where are the children you asked? Do I look like their mom or something? How do I know? I am not saying they are alive right now, idiot. I don’t know about that but what I know is the shooting is a hoax.

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@snezychan said:

@sylvie_dottir: It may or may not have happened but it is irrelevant. To me it did happen but it was instigated by the Mossad not some Muslim hijackers. The point is Sandy Hook definitely didn’t happen because the Court literally turned the first amendment THE FIRST LAW of our country into a toilet paper and ordered Alex Jones to pay the fine for something he has been approved by the laws to say. The court went against its own principles and that is how we know they tried to cover the trails to the truth of the event. It didn’t happen so deal with it. Why need a law to censor someone if that which they speak is false? The only reason for it is that they speak the truth and are destroying your narrative… Besides IT HAPPENED IN AMERICA, not under some dictatorship, where freedom of expression has been absolute for centuries and has been a theme of this country. Where are the children you asked? Do I look like their mom or something? How do I know? I am not saying they are alive right now, idiot. I don’t know about that but what I know is the shooting is a hoax.

Your logic is that of a family freak who lives on her brother's back (some random thing i wanted to say, no offense). Anyways, you have no proof that this stuff didn't happen. Go dig up some graves if you want to be so bold, my friend.

Avatar image for mustafa-28
Mustafa-28

981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By Snezychan

@sylvie_dottir: That is really weird though. The proof has been presented but you didn’t even bother reading. Americans are not and never going to be punishable for what they say under the first amendment but Alex Jones got huge fine saying it, imagine. The only reason he got in trouble is because IT NEVER HAPPENED, lady. It is a lie and the government needs to cover it up. This is literally the case where, “the court committed a crime”. If they wouldn’t let anyone talk about it I surely am not going to be allowed to dig their graves lol.

Avatar image for kayuga_obito
Kayuga_Obito

166

Forum Posts

7109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@snezychan said:

@sylvie_dottir: That is really weird though. The proof has been presented but you didn’t even bother reading. Americans are not and never going to be punishable for what they say under the first amendment but Alex Jones got huge fine saying it, imagine. The only reason he got in trouble is because IT NEVER HAPPENED, lady. It is a lie and the government needs to cover it up.

Alex Jones = nutjob. And this benefits the government how? The government cannot even make stricter gun laws, but can somehow make up fake lives of dozens of children, and fake their deaths on National television? Ok, seems to check out 🤔🤓

Avatar image for snezychan
Snezychan

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By Snezychan

@sylvie_dottir: Uuh. Nutjob = outlawed and cannot speak what they want? “CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW”, consider that. Stricter gun laws = the rights of the entire state or even the entire country violated, fake footage = people see false information on tv which doesn’t affect them directly right at that point. Which do you think is easier? How can you not expect a backlash when you seek to implement some crazy restrictions?? Staging false shooting concerns waaaay less people and gives them a lot less risk, as you simply are leading people to think “guns are dangerous”. How about the protests? How about the possible riots? How about the uprisings? That is what they have expected before they take our guns so they don’t just take them right away. Sandy Hook legitimately doesn’t force people to come out and do any of those against anybody. It is also a psyop. If you want to disarm the people wouldn’t you want to at least make them feel bad about themselves or afraid of their own weapons?? Sandy Hook is there to do that. But btw we will soon have stricter gun laws as the ATF is thriving under illegitimate Biden.

The evidence is as clear as day, friend. They literally committed a crime against the founding fathers. He was sued because they had to cover up.