I'd give more money to the one that can do almost everything very well only if you pay him enough. Yeah the other person has a heart to do his/her best and that's good but I want everything to be done to the best and I have to choose who to pay more to make the business get to the best it can be and paying the second person won't be as effective to my business as paying the first person
I would pay base on what stated in the contract
If the person failed to produce results for whatever reasons whether due to incompetence or deliberate act of under-performance (because he believes he is entitled to some compensation not stated on the contract) then I would fire them for underperforming and/or breach of contract.
First one. Talent, experience and skill are highly prized in the business world. The second one should stick to it and rise up within the company from the results he provides. Proving that you're an asset is worthwhile, too. Good intentions alone only go so far.
I think you might've missed the point.lol
Nah.It's not what you know. It's who you know. I've seen many people who actually fit the ideal job description they're applying for just to get blackballed by nepotism or referrals from a friend working a sister company. Experience doesn't mean jack most of the time. If it did, many people would get hired.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment