How does your cognitive ability initially encode a year number in the thousands range?

Avatar image for life_without_progress
life_without_progress

34034

Forum Posts

5563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Welcome to another one of Life_Without_Progress' thought experiments based on Cognitive Psychology.

How does your cognitive ability initially encode a year number in the thousands range?

Let's say, when you read the year number "1984"

How does your mind process it at first?

Would you say you read it as "One Thousand, Nine Hundred Eighty Four" or "Nineteen Eighty Four"

Another example, "2018"

Did you read as "Two Thousand Eighteen" first or was it "Twenty Eighteen".

Avatar image for magian
Magian

159119

Forum Posts

925

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

The former for me. But it is also a language thing for me since in my language we don't say "Twenty - Nineteen".

Avatar image for wollfmyth209
WollfMyth209

17626

Forum Posts

3513

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

It's based on practicality for me. Saying Ninteen Eighty-Four is easier than saying One Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty Four, so I usually think that way as well.

However, in my mother language, we don't really talk like that so I just say the full year.

Avatar image for sc
SC

18454

Forum Posts

182748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#4 SC  Moderator

Depends on the number. Numbers that have a certain significance to me, tend to be read or thought of as different than numbers that don't. I think 1984 and I think of the novel and I think nineteen eighty four. Ditto two thousand and eighteen. Numbers that are more abstract, less significant relatively, I might think and read differently. How numbers interact with each also might determine how I read or describe them.

Avatar image for atmexle
AtmExle

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Numbers that bear some significant are read as the latter. Everyone pronounces 1984 as "Nineteen Eighty-four" as opposed to " One thousand nine hundred and eighty-four", so my initial interpretations on how I would read significantly four digit numbers would resemble this method.

However, if I were to solve a math problem and get a four-digit number such as " 2390", I will always read it as "two thousand, three hundred and ninety". I even might read 1984 that way if I were to solve a math problem and get that answer without me mentally linking this to the book. I suppose it's because of the way we read things in our native language or culture. In some cultures it is read as the former, in others it is read as the latter.

Avatar image for spareheadone
SpareHeadOne

12237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Nineteen eighty four

Then

Two thousand eighteen

Avatar image for theonewhopullsthestrings
TheOneWhoPullsTheStrings

2746

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Nineteen + Eightyfour. I read them in the order as I see them mostly.

This seems to hold true even if it isn't a significant meaning number like 1984.

If I were to see a random number, like 4532,

I would usually read it as "four thousand, five hundred and thirty two"

Avatar image for tjd2814
tjd2814

534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Based on context

if I see that in a history class its nineteen eighty four

If its in a math class it then becomes nineteen hundred and eighty four

Same applies for outside of the classroom for me it is context based

Avatar image for richubs
Richubs

8847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I read it as we read years.

"Nineteen ninty four"

Avatar image for helloman
helloman

30115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As both.