Poll Do you think Bigfoot is Real? (100 votes)
Do you think Bigfoot is Real?
@oopsislipped: That's convenient. It would be more believable if there were any video or pictures of him, but there's not.
There have been but a video or picture will be labeled a hoax every time.
Sasquatch isn't a missing link, Humans & Sasquatch have a common ancestor but Sasquatch took a different evolutionary route. Whereas we began wearing furs & starting fires, lost our body hair & started building tools & machines to do every thing for us they didn't. They adopted a shamanistic life style in the wild. We're so closely related that we can inter breed.
@oopsislipped: Because they're inconclusive. They're mostly all recorded from a considerable distance, with a very poor camera. Those are the only photos/videos that exist.
@oopsislipped: Because they're inconclusive. They're mostly all recorded from a considerable distance, with a very poor camera. Those are the only photos/videos that exist.
It does suck that the best footage was recorded in the 60's. Sure a few have come forward claiming to have been involved in a hoax but not one is reliable or can produce the alleged costume in question.
@oopsislipped: Everytime someone makes a claim that they have a Sasquatch corpse, it's either fake or they never show it.
@oopsislipped: Everytime someone makes a claim that they have a Sasquatch corpse, it's either fake or they never show it.
Or a cover up? Seriously though I doubt anyone's ever really had one. Even bear corpses are extremely rare to find & bears are everywhere so imagine something as intelligent as a human if not more so trying to hide their existence.
@oopsislipped: Who would care enough to cover up the existence of Bigfoot? It's not like they're the illuminati.
@oopsislipped: Who would care enough to cover up the existence of Bigfoot? It's not like they're the illuminati.
That was meant as a joke.
@oopsislipped: The entire notion of Bigfoot is a joke.
Yes.
No I don't, but out of all the mythological beings that the media continues to reference, Bigfoot would be the most plausible in my opinion.
It's just an overgrown ape. More believable than the Loch Ness Monster or a werewolf.
No I don't, but out of all the mythological beings that the media continues to reference, Bigfoot would be the most plausible in my opinion.
It's just an overgrown ape. More believable than the Loch Ness Monster or a werewolf.
I'm fully convinced it's more akin to a human than an ape.
I wonder how often the calls that Bigfoot hunters hear and respond to are actually other nearby Bigfoot hunters.
No. Bigfoot is an urban legend that has no concrete evidence. If it were around, how could it and others like it stay hidden so long when we have satellites and state of the art technology that surely would've captured one by now.
Bigfoot is real. He played in the NBA for like 17 seasons and was well known. I think they called him Shack when he was playing.
At some point something similar to a big foot might have been real. Sure certain types of animals live a long time, just find it sketchy that this thing has been around for like 70 some odd years and if there is more then one, then the evidence of it's existence would be more abundant.
No
Even if you wanted to say they lived in desolated areas they would still have to have a need for nutrients food and water to survive
The fact that no dna traces or real evidence of one has been found and I doubt it would be intelligent enough to completely cover its tracks is just a highly improbable chance that they exist
You’d have a better chance at finding a new sea creature thousands of feet below sea level than finding big foot
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment