Do you agree female soldiers fight together with male soldiers at front line?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Do you agree female soldiers fight together with male soldiers at front line? (23 votes)

Yes, gender means shit in battlefield, everyone have to fight. 48%
No, they would only slow down the real soldiers. 17%
Only if they achieve the same level combat training as male soldiers and have great physical not far behind male. 9%
No even they have the physical and combat training women still not have the same mental capability as men so I won't agree. 9%
Women don't even deserve join the military in the first place. 9%
Yes, cook and nursing for front line male soldiers. 4%
Other. 4%
 • 
Avatar image for hydratedfubuki6
HydratedFubuki6

8518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If they want to and they're capable of, why not?

Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for hydratedfubuki6
HydratedFubuki6

8518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for deactivated-60758db60e021
deactivated-60758db60e021

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Sure. Not sure why anyone would really want to, but I see no reason to discriminate on the basis of gender.

Avatar image for rhubarb
Rhubarb

2082

Forum Posts

2102

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Rhubarb

Depends on the role they're assigned to.

Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for rhubarb
Rhubarb

2082

Forum Posts

2102

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for king-ragnar
King-Ragnar

6940

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Avatar image for spareheadone
SpareHeadOne

11758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Put them right up front

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't think so.

Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@hkesupermantis: I don't even think females should be soldiers at all. It doesn't sound right for them to fight, let alone lead.

Avatar image for deactivated-60758db60e021
deactivated-60758db60e021

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@hkesupermantis: I don't even think females should be soldiers at all. It doesn't sound right for them to fight, let alone lead.

Raze would be proud of this comment. It's all there. A vague sense of entitlement, chauvinism, sexism.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for redhood_jaytodd
RedHood_JayTodd

4311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Why not?

Avatar image for whathappened
Whathappened

3165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Whathappened  Online

Imagine a female soldier when captured, the men would have a field day

Avatar image for darkthunder
Darkthunder

15652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yes, gender means shit in battlefield, everyone have to fight.

Avatar image for darkthunder
Darkthunder

15652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@hkesupermantis: I don't even think females should be soldiers at all. It doesn't sound right for them to fight, let alone lead.

I don't agree. Sure, most women' nature is to be empathetic and be less aggressive, but there are women out there tougher than the toughest guys

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkthunder: So, in general, you agree? Sure, acting tougher than some women is their choice, but that's not what they should be doing.

Avatar image for baldur_odinson
Baldur_Odinson

4836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@universenumber1 said:

@hkesupermantis: I don't even think females should be soldiers at all. It doesn't sound right for them to fight, let alone lead.

Raze would be proud of this comment. It's all there. A vague sense of entitlement, chauvinism, sexism.

You've got to let go of that anger you have for Raze, and by extension, me. Not everything is black and white. And even then, there's nothing wrong with thinking women shouldn't be doing certain things that are primarily acted out by men; I agree that women shouldn't do lots of things men do, but that doesn't mean I'm entitled, chauvinistic, or sexist.

Avatar image for darkthunder
Darkthunder

15652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkthunder: So, in general, you agree? Sure, acting tougher than some women is their choice, but that's not what they should be doing.

not what they should be doing? Elucidate pleae

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkthunder: Women's GIVE life, not TAKE life. Who do you think their children's are gonna miss the presence more, their mom or dad? I'm sure it's the one who gave them birth and shared pain with them.
Women's should take a job that has no risk for them and their families. This is mainly men's job.

Avatar image for darkthunder
Darkthunder

15652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkthunder: Women's GIVE life, not TAKE life. Who do you think their children's are gonna miss the presence more, their mom or dad? I'm sure it's the one who gave them birth and shared pain with them.

Women's should take a job that has no risk for them and their families. This is mainly men's job.

and men help give life. You think man's purpose is to take life? Children can miss their father more too, you can't come to conclusions like that..

Avatar image for baldur_odinson
Baldur_Odinson

4836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@universenumber1 said:

@darkthunder: Women's GIVE life, not TAKE life. Who do you think their children's are gonna miss the presence more, their mom or dad? I'm sure it's the one who gave them birth and shared pain with them.

Women's should take a job that has no risk for them and their families. This is mainly men's job.

and men help give life. You think man's purpose is to take life? Children can miss their father more too, you can't come to conclusions like that..

THAT is sexist, what UN1 said.

Avatar image for last0fth3risen
last0fth3risen

2678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Modern soldiers almost never engage in H2H combat, so the general strength difference between the sexes wouldn't matter. Women are capable of attaining the level of physical fitness required for all necessary activities, so there is no reason to prevent them, if willing.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ff45903d43d7
deactivated-5ff45903d43d7

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkthunder: Yes, but it's not the same as the mother. I'm not making concuslions, it's how it is. I never said men's only job is to take life, you got me wrong.

Avatar image for macleen
macleen

4541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Depends on how they got there.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

29853

Forum Posts

10082

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#28 dernman  Online

Sure. Not sure why anyone would really want to, but I see no reason to discriminate on the basis of gender.

I'm curious about what you mean by want to and why not.

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Let see how many of you feel that way when your injured and need a female soldier to help carry you from a hostile area.

Avatar image for amonfire1776
Amonfire1776

4055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By Amonfire1776

I agree 100% that women should be allowed to serve frontline: just look at Israel vs their enemies.

Avatar image for gothamcitizen
GothamCitizen

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Loading Video...

Avatar image for alavanka
Alavanka

3193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By Alavanka

No. Not in roles that involve carrying heavy gear, at least.

This (link) is a report the Marine Corps conducted. I'll highlight some of the key points.

No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided

To recap: Men were on average larger and had less body fat. They had greater upper and lower body strength. They had better cardio. They were faster. They could carry more weight. They were less likely to be injured during training. They could throw their gear and traverse obstacles without assistance. They were better shots. The bottom line is that all male troops performed better than ones with female integration, and therein lies our answer. Troops should always maximize their chances for success. Social justice theories be damned.

Avatar image for jaylinfreeman
JaylinFreeman

3859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Modern soldiers almost never engage in H2H combat, so the general strength difference between the sexes wouldn't matter. Women are capable of attaining the level of physical fitness required for all necessary activities, so there is no reason to prevent them, if willing.