Could Hillary Clinton Be The Next President Of The U.S.

Title is pretty self explanatory what do u think? Best answer will be posted.

God no

@cgoodness:

it is very likely she might.

I sincerely doubt it.

Yup, it's pretty much guaranteed unless the Republicans can get a more moderate candidate that more people can somehow relate to. But I doubt it and I hope she doesn't become president. She seems pretty crazy to me and people will only vote for her because she's a woman and not whether they think she's qualified or not. So then they could say we just broke another boundary.

@cgoodness: @transformers1024: If anybody would become the first female president it would most likely be her. I'm just curious as to why u say no.

@deadcool_xd: not really, the American people are very anti-war, plus if the 2014 election showed us anything is that America wants to avoid Obama like politicans, I'd be surprised if she makes it out of primaries.

@cgoodness: we shall see. (-_-)d

the emoticon I posted was unnecessary. In fact this comment I am typing right now is unnecessary!

RAND PAUL disagrees.

So Obama was the first black president and he sucked (I ain't racist just stating a opinion) so will the first female president stink too? But it's not completely likely

She could, but I highly doubt it.

from the Democratic Party she definitely is a candidate but with Obama's approval rating taking a lot, many on the fence voters probably will side with Republicans due to economic issues.

Don't get me wrong, Chris Christie isn't no lock or is Jeb Bush, but any regime to change economics in the US probably will sway on fence voters since they might think they are getting the same regime since Clinton was on Obama's Cabinet.

As a Democratic Canidate though, yes, she could be President if she wins the election and is a strong candidate for the DEMs

@deadcool_xd: Did you vote Obama last election?

@cgoodness: XD

Clinton is definitely qualified, but I think they'll probably go with another person to represent the Democrats. Vice President can be very likely?

Absolutely. If most fools love Obama then why not her?

@noone301994: so Obama didn't brainwash you either

@ironspiderchan45: Lol nope.

probably could

The last thing we need as a president.. I can't say doing better than Obama will take effort though..

Oh your god i hope not. Her foreign policy is, KILL IT WITH !!!

But she might. My late mother in law said she would vote Hilldog, and i quote, "us girls have to stick together."

God, I hope not. She is the devil.

She probably will. Alteast, most current (premature) polls project that.

I'd rather any Democrat win than a Republican!

The midterms voters are not really representative of those who will vote in the 2016 Presidential election.

Hillary is definitely one of the contenders. On the Democrat side, Hillary is the only one with buzz except for Elizabeth Warren who is getting the Obama camp's endorsement and a lot of laudatory articles on leftist media. Hillary is the more moderate option, and I use this only in comparison to Warren, for the Democrats.

Hillary will probably draw on the nostalgia from the Clinton years, and if Obama's poll numbers continue to go down, she will probably emphasize the fact that she left the Obama administration because she was not on board with all his actions. This is a sound strategy, but Hillary has a very grating presence, and once she is under the political microscope, it will be hard to ignore how prickily she is.

And who knows who the Republicans will run against her or what the political landscape will look like in another two years? There's even a chance that a dark horse candidate might swipe the Democrat ticket from Hillary and Warren. President Obama came out of nowhere in 2016.

Obama's numbers have ticked upwards. Of course, this can clearly change either way. I agree that Hilary will draw nostalgia from the Clinton years, Bill Clinton was a damn good President, he's withstood the test of time but how many will actually fall for Hilary = Bill in quality?

If the Republicans run someone like Jeb Bush or Chris Christie, they will lose. But for their sake, I hope they do not run a schmuck like that.

Seems likely. But I would be a bit concerned for her health because if she does run (and wins) she'll probably beat Reagan for the record of oldest president elected to office. The presidency is also an extremely stressful job and she had a health scare about a year ago, so hopefully she doesn't end up killing herself if she wins.

She'd probably have an affair with the secretary.

@frozen:

Whether Obama's numbers are up or down depend on when you start counting. He may have moved up a tad in the last two weeks, by he's fallen a ton in the past two years. Real Clear Politics had him going from positive 10 to negative 10 in that span. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

I agree that if the R's put up Bush or Chrisite, they deserve to lose, but I have no idea which way the nation will go in an election. I don't like anybody who has run in a long time, so...

We dont need any more Bush's or Clinton's for president. Christie would lose, Rand Paul has a chance but he doesnt seem to be conjuring up any steam yet, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz might try but they are in the same boat as Paul.

I'm a libertarian/ Independent. Fiscally Conservative, Socially liberal. So I would vote based on that. But I'm not impressed with the selection so far from either side. Unless Paul or Rubio can get something going I guess.

Did she support the Turk's genocides of Armenia?

quote from reddit

Wall Street Journal now has a page where you can browse through some of the unclassified emails. Not everything is new:

1. The 2010's Armenia-Turkey relations normalization attempt was intense. They contacted back and forth a lot. Turkey and Armenia privately expressed their views on the issue before the meeting. Turkish FM basically blamed the Armenian diaspora in US and France for supporting Armenia/Karabakh.

2. There was a bill in Congress about the recognition of Armenian Genocide. Clinton administration contacted the foreign affairs department and Nancy Pelosi to prevent the passage of the bill.

3. The department keeps track of all the countries that vote in favor and against the bills proposed/supported by US. They want to know which countries have similar voting record. Here are the results for Armenia http://imgur.com/fV3jkht On top you see 1-9 most important resolutions and on bottom the voting results for each country. On the right side you see the % of voting coincidence for non-important issues. In another email, one of Clinton's advisers was surprised that Armenia voted against an anti-Iran resolution.

NOOOOO. Not only is she a feminist and very very very very inexperienced, but she is spitting lies to everybody by saying goals that she never succeeded in and saying she helped all of these people and the funny thing is "Did you ever hear about it until she wanted to run for president". No we don't need that shite in the governmental system.

May GOD have mercy upon us.

Aw Jesus hell naw! I'd rather have Trump than her.

Could: yes

Should: nope. Although she'd be better than most, if not every, republican candidate. At least the ones that actually have a shot.

Of course she could, she's not inept, just shady as hell and supernaturally irritating.

You say that like equality is a bad thing.

Hillary will use super-delegates to cheat her way to victory adn win her party's nomination. Whether she's wins the nomination from her own political party depends on delegates and the popular vote.

Super-delegate votes count more than regular delegates, and enough of any delegate votes are worth more than popular vote.

Say hello, to the rule of the oligarchy.

So much for "Democracy". Your vote doesn't count, only the votes of super-delegates matter.

And don't forget "electoral college"! Welcome to tyranny, everyone!

Watch out Hillary! I think I see some sniper fire!

I is smart.

By the way, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

The odds are very much against her even gaining the nomination. She has too many enemies in her own party, and Sanders has too much growing support. (The women who don't vote for her are going to Hell thing didn't help, either). Even if she did win the nomination, that would be a sweet deal for the Republicans (Unless, they by some idiocy nominated Trump, then who the heck knows), because she's so distrusted by so many in the middle, it might rouse enough "some time" voters enough for the Republicans to pull off a victory in the General Election.

These are just my thoughts on the matter. I'm not a paid political analyst I just play one on Comic Vine. :)

Beeerrrnnniieeeeee

It would be a surprise if Hilary didn't win. All the candidates are terrible lol

As much as everyone hates it it is very likely.